“highly significant”

In addition, only the PM components with a diameter less than 2.5 μm were able to determine a statistically significant reduction in cellular activity ( p < 0.01) in both B3 and C3 samples and a highly significant reduction in D3 ( p < 0.001).

With respect to cluster * age, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests revealed that there were highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between two of the clusters (1 * 3 and 2 * 3).

Highly significant associations were found between duration of acne, post-acne hyperpigmentation, and grade of acne with DLQI scores (all p<0.001), showing that longer duration, hyperpigmentation, and higher grades of acne significantly worsened QoL.

The difference was considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05, very significant when p ≤ 0.01, and highly significant when p ≤ 0.001.

The antioxidant capacity of the non-PC fraction exceeded that of PC and ACE; this difference was highly significant across a wide dose range ( p <.001).

Formal comparison of the survival curves using the Mantel–Haenszel test leads to a highly significant result ( P < 0.001).

The association between occupational category and anti-HBs antibody titre in the present study was highly significant (p < 0.001), consistent with findings reported by Sharma et al., who also observed higher seroprotection rates among doctors followed by nursing staff [ 9 ].

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant, X 2 (1830) = 13105.13, p < .001, suggesting that the item pool was correlated enough to run an EFA.

Comparing the log 2 fold changes in gene expression upon RA treatment with those upon 5-aza-dC treatment reveals a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation (R = 0.76, red), which is even retained when comparing those genes significantly regulated in only one of the two conditions (R = 0.72, 5-aza-dC, brown; R = 0.57, RA, green; Figure 1 C, left panel).

This showed that the model was highly significant [χ 2 (4) = 19.22, p = .001; Nagelkerke R 2 = .19].

Thus, PCI showed a highly significant association with the length of stay, with a p-value <0.001.

Using the same model as above (Model 1), a highly significant association between smoking status and mean cortical thickness was observed (F (2, 499)=14.7, P <0.001; Figure 2d ).

In the period AD 1301 to AD 1550, before the transition to a dryer regime, the correlation between ENSO and rainfall variability is highly significant (r = -0.495, p<0.001, n = 240).

All AUCs were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and were highest (0.954, 0.940 and 0.943) in the respective subgroups with ovarian cases.

There was also a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) in the random blood glucose level in the TZ group compared to the control group.

1 The rate ratio was 0.79 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.69–0.91, which was highly significant ( P = 0.001).

In vitro cell viability Comparing combined therapy (NP + US) with NP alone treatments, the summed analysis across 86 studies demonstrated a highly significant reduction in cell viability attributable to US activation, with a pooled SMD of −13.16 (95% CI [−14.67, −11.64], p < 0.001).

Patients with an acute transfusion reaction were statistically older (median age = 41.2 ± 11.2 years; P < 0.0001) than their partners without a minor or major acute transfusion reaction (average age = 21.6 ± 3.6 years) ( Figure 5 ). Transfusion Days and Acute Transfusion Reaction There was a highly significant association (P<0.001) between the rates of acute transfusion reaction and the days when blood transfusions were performed during the week in the form of an exponential curve.

The improvements in mean knowledge scores were highly significant (peer education p < 0.001; poster p = 0.004), but the reduced sample size may exaggerate this effect.

However, AMOVAs conducted on all nuclear data showed that divergence between each pair of species was highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 3 ) and the highest genetic divergence existed between P. schrenkiana and P. smithiana (Table 3 ) which may be caused by large geographic distance.

In the LSCS group, the IPG-BFV between both legs exhibited a highly significant correlation (r=0.884; P<0.001; n=15; right IPG-BFV = 0.870 × left IPG-BFV + 7.583), indicating good reproducibility.

NCAM1 was found to be associated with four neuropathic pain‐related GWAS traits in humans, two of which were highly significant with a p < 0.001 (Tables 2 and 3 ).

Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses produced a highly significant main effect of time ( F = 66.17, p < 0.001), accompanied by a large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.68).

The higher proportion of infants with protective levels of anti-HBs in the TDF-BF Group, although initially borderline statistically significant ( P = 0.046) at 12 months, demonstrated a highly significant and sustained benefit at the three-year follow-up (92.7% vs. 75.0%, P < 0.001).

Wilks' Lambda tests were highly significant in all comparisons ( p < 0.001), confirming that both ZComplexity and ZConvex Hull Volume contributed meaningfully to group discrimination.