“highly significant”

With pollen from plants with S 1 S 3 haplotypes, SI induced strong inhibition of pollen tube length (22.1%, P<0.001 ***, n=300) and addition of as- PrpS 1 -ODNs gave a highly significant recovery of SI-treated tubes (58.3% increase in length compared to SI-treated; P<0.001, ***, n=150), and incompatible pollen responded in a bimodal manner, consistent with only S 1 pollen being affected ( Supplemental Fig 4 ).

After doing so the calculated overall increase in systemic ventricular EF/fractional area of change and decrease in the z score of the systemic ventricular end-diastolic dimension still remained highly significant with +11.2 (13.7)% and median −1.3, respectively (p<0.001 for both).

The Friedman test showed a highly significant effect of format on comprehension (χ 2 = 126.61, df = 5, p < .001).

and Nitrosomonadaceae were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001); Acidobacteria, Nocardioides, and Roseiflexaceae were significantly different ( P ≤ 0.01); and Pyrinomonadaceae, Gemmatimonadaceae, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi were also significantly different ( P ≤ 0.05).

Sobel (1982) tests of the mediated effects of negative affect on ruminative self-focus were highly significant for goal importance ( z = 5.04, p < .001), goal success ( z = 10.58, p < .001), and the importance by success interaction ( z = 3.97, p < .001).

Two-way ANOVA (data not shown) showed highly significant time, and genotype × time interactions for height, diameter, number of stems and biomass (p < 0.001 in all cases).

The difference in survival probabilities from the time of diagnosis and from the start of treatment with purine analogs between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Model IV (versus model III), shows that the influence of A is highly significant since removing it from the model results in a considerable worsening of fit (χ 2 (1) = 293.2, p <.001).

There is a highly significant (p < 0.001) time-dependent difference in age distribution.

The Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 167.5, p < 0.001), supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis [ 29 ].

This indicates that while Enprocal D did not induce oxidative stress in the gut cells, P2 treatment led to highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in the activities of these enzymes indicating that it is inducing an oxidative stress response.

A highly significant linear effect resulted for the Med × Latency interaction (T-lin(1,10) = 23.05; p < 0.001): Under MPH, MEP amplitudes increased with time whereas, under placebo, they decreased (see Fig. 4a ).

However, there was a greater than 57% reduction in the number of sporozoites found 2 h post-feeding, compared with 0 h; this was highly significant; P = 0.001.

RNAi for four of the ten genes (encoding a transcription factor and three components of distinct protein-kinase signaling cascades) produced highly significant gains in peroxide survival (each P <0.001), and a fifth dsRNA exposure offered marginally significant protection ( vps-34 , P <0.03).

Cell-cycle state and genomic instability A highly significant association between tumour grade and genomic instability (ploidy status) was observed ( P <0.001).

Weights of liver, spleen and kidney increased 1.9, 10.3 and 1.7 fold respectively over this period, and the change in weight, both absolute and relative to body weight, was highly significant in all cases (ANOVA p<0.001) ( Figure 4a ).

This difference in the proportion of EST clones that display significant differentiation in gene expression in the two datasets was highly significant (Fisher's Exact test, p < 0.001).

The increase in cell survival was demonstrable at 25 μM (p < 0.01) acetaminophen and highly significant at 50 to 300 μM (p < 0.001).

The interaction between the diagnosis of HTN and the benefit of trandolapril treatment was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Gustafsson et al 1997 ).

0.004), perhaps due to differences in the durations of the delay period, but statistically still highly significant in both studies (all p values < 0.001).

While 100% relief in pain (highly significant [P < 0.001**]) was observed in group-II.

Differences between groups were considered as significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant when P < 0.001.

A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the distribution of the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix and the extra-diagonal elements ( Figure 4C ) resulted in a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), indicating that the predicted task maps are significantly more correlated to their actual maps than to the maps of other subjects.

The results of the repeated measures ANOVAs indicate that there is a highly significant effect of age (intra-subjects differences) on Word production [ F (2) = 309.430, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.805]; no significant combined effect of age x group is found [ F (2) = 0.901, p = 0.408, η 2 = 0.012]; no significant difference between groups (PT vs.

Interprofessional Teamwork Confidence and Skills For the PACT student self-assessment, the Wilcoxon rank sum test found that sections with consistently significant improvements were “familiarity working and training with teams,” “learning and performance,” and “learning environments.” All items in the PACT section of understanding of interprofessional teamwork were highly significant for improvement ( p < .001).