“highly significant”

The correlation analysis of various stress-related symptoms demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001).

The global trend showed a highly significant change in BP control over time (p<0.001).

According to bivariate categorical analysis, six highly significant (p<0.001) animal- and farm-level risk factors for sheep were age, breed, number of lambings, history of abortion, rural farms, and presence of dogs on the farm.

rhabdocladus were highly significant ( P < 0.001), while the effect of maximum temperature on was significant (0.001 < P < 0.01).

Results Left ventricular diastolic function was compared between the studied groups and showed that the mean peak early mitral inflow velocity E wave and the color M-mode flow propagation velocity of early diastolic flow (Vp) were significantly lower, and the mean peak late mitral inflow velocity A wave was significantly higher in uncontrolled diabetics versus controlled diabetic patients and control group with highly significant statistical difference (p < 0.001).

The difference in incidence rates between gender was highly significant, (Z = 6.81, p < .001): 11.3% of the females but only 1.5% of the males had reported frequent headaches at T3.

This is a difference that is highly significant statistically ( p < 0.001).

For the representative subject ( Figure 2B ), the correlation coefficients for both color- ( r = 0.66) and disparity-selective activation maps ( r = 0.53) were highly significant (both p<0.001, family-wise-error [FWE] corrected; activation patterns from the two sessions were shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 2 ).

First, the dataset is suitable for the reduction technique as the Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( p <0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect was observed between the groups.

These differences are robust across different age comparisons, with particularly strong effects observed in the transitions to ages 14 and 15, where the decrease in overlap compared to earlier ages consistently shows large effect sizes [HLe’s >3.0 (lower 95% CI >2.5)] and highly significant differences [all MWU p values <0.001].

However, factorability of the correlation matrix was excellent: the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.919 (item MSA values all > 0.70 ), and Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001 ) , confirming that the inter‐item correlations were appropriate for factor analysis.:contentReference [oaicite:1]index = 1.

A vertical cortical displacement greater than 1.29 mm also demonstrated a highly significant 6.8-fold increased risk for the presence of preoperative hypoesthesia ( p < 0.001).

In distinction, there was a highly significant but weak correlation between ∆R2* and ∆R1 (ρ, 0.230; P < .001; Fig E1 [online]).

Across the six types of hybrid males, we observed a highly significant interaction between X chromosome type and genetic background (Fig. 2 A; ANOVA: F 2,419 = 30.64, P < 0.001).

The statistical analysis was performed using a one-factor ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc test and showed highly significant differences ( P < .001; Table 2 ).

In the first 15 months of the study, there were an average of 2.5 staff changes in the US compared to an average of 1.1 staff changes in Finland and 0.3 staff changes in Sweden (mothers’ data), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001 both for mothers and fathers).

The type of solvent and nHA percentages were two different independent variables, and differences considered statistically significant in p < 0.05, very significant in p < 0.01, and highly significant in p < 0.001.

Results: After PNAM therapy, there was a significant increase in nostril height ( P = 0.003) and highly significant increase in columella length ( P = 0.001).

A highly significant correlation was found between the RNA-seq and real-time RT-PCR results ( P = 0.001, R 2 = 0.9114).

Alpha diversity ( Figure 5 ) analysis of bacterial taxon abundance in the three test groups (C, PC and P) indicated a highly significant difference in the Chao1 index ( P < 0.001, ANOVA), with a highly significant difference between the C and PC groups ( P < 0.001) and a significant difference between the C and P group ( P < 0.05).

The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis confirmed a highly significant survival benefit in both DOX-treated groups compared with the Control ( P < 0.001), supported by negative Z -statistics in mortality prediction, indicating a strong protective effect of doxycycline treatment.

The level of significance was set as P-value ≤ 0.05 considered significant (*), P-value ≤ 0.01 considered highly significant (**), P-value ≤ 0.001 (***) considered highly significant.

The association between PSS score and monthly per capita income was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

Approximately 82.2% of healthcare professionals and 62.8% of the participants from other professions brushed for 1-3 minutes in their single brushing session, which was a highly significant difference according to the intergroup comparison ( P < 0.001).