“highly significant”

Further confirming the visual impression, planned post-hoc one-tailed t-tests on CS+>CS− difference scores showed no significant activation during early conditioning [UF-Cond1: t(16) = 0.28, p = 0.393], an already significant, though rather weak, reaction during late conditioning [UF-Cond2: t(16) = 2.11, p = 0.025] and a strong and highly significant reaction to the CS+ during testing [UF-Test: t(16) = 3.81, p = 0.001].

The mean fluorescence intensity for targeting liposome was about 1.41, 2.74, and 5.72-fold stronger than that for DOX/CEL lipo, DOX lipo, and DOX solu respectively after 4 h incubation, showing a highly significant difference (P<0.001).

Notably, most correlations were highly significant, including correlations with M2 macrophages (CD163, VSIG4, and MS4A4A, cor: 0.47–0.51, P < 0.001) and Tregs (CCR8, TGFB1, STAT5B, and FOXP3, cor: 0.37–0.48, P < 0.001).

Crucially, direct effects of both baseline and cumulative ASCVD10 year scores on all cardiovascular outcomes remained highly significant ( P < 0.001) after accounting for these mediators.

A 3×2 ANCOVA controlling for age, found a highly significant difference between patient groups [ F (2, 268) = 7.14, P = 0.001; see Table 2 ].

All our estimates are highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that proper hand hygiene plays a crucial role in substantially reducing the spread of infectious diseases.

When including precuneal Aβ slope and the interaction term (Aβ precuneus *∆Aβ precuneus ) in the model, the predictive power of baseline amyloid burden in this ROI became highly significant (β = −0.29, t = −3.7, P < .001), and both precuneus slope (β = −9.71, t = −2.2, P = .030) and the interaction term (β = 8.71, t = 2.6, P = .011) were marginally predictive of changes in MMSE.

Additionally, a highly significant difference was noted in YOE ( P < 0.001).

demonstrated highly significant difference ( P =0.001) between Ki-67 proliferation rates of mesothelial cells from patients with malignant tumors other than mesothelial origin (7.0% to 25.5%) and mesothelial cells of patients without any malignant disease (1.8% to 16.3%).

However, a highly significant decrease in cell viability emerged after 24 hours of treatment with 60 μM JY-2 compared to the 40 μM group ( p < 0.001).

Our methodology generates angle and duration means that are good representation of the mean for the whole dance For both angle and duration, there was a highly significant correlation between our four waggle run sample ( x 1 ) and the mean of all the waggle runs within a dance ( x t ) (Regression analysis: Angle: R 2 = 99.7%, p<0.001; Duration: R 2 = 97.3%, p<0.001; Fig. 5 ).

A p -value of <0.05 (*) was considered as significant, p -value of <0.01(**) was highly significant and P <0.001 (***) was very highly significant.

The difference between eFAST and clinical examination was also highly significant (p < 0.001), whereas CXR showed a modest but significant improvement over clinical findings (p = 0.004).

The effect of SY on histopathology scores of the liver was highly significant for SY60 group ( P < 0.001), compared to SY15 and control groups which recorded much lower values nearest to zero level.

The number of perineal massage is a protective factor associated with reduced perineal injury and a shorter second stage of labor Further analysis within the massage group revealed a highly significant difference in the number of massages among participants with varying degrees of perineal injury ( P < 0.001).

Continuous trend analysis ( Figure 4 ) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for the worsened kidney function endpoint (i.e., lower endpoint incidence with the lowest achieved SBP).

While this confirms a minor confoundment, the effect of MA on PU only decreased slightly and remained highly significant ( β = 0.205, p < 0.001).

The APL, FNPL, and surface DSC at 0 mm remained highly significant correlates with correction time in every T stage, overall stage, and thoracic volume quartile subgroup ( p values < 0.001) except the stage IIIA subgroup, in which only the APL and FNPL (but not the surface DSC) were significant correlates.

Of note, this difference remained highly significant ( P < 0.001) when alternative thresholds for high satisfaction (values > 6 and values > 7) were applied.

Results Results of dengue indices showed that the settlements around gasoline stations/workshops, in the vicinity of marsh/swamp and rice paddy appeared to be favorable habitat for dengue vector propagation at highly significant and positive correlation (p = 0.001) in the month of May.

Using student t -test, improvements at discharge, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment showed a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant relationships between DOM and microbial compositions were observed by CCorA (Pillai’s trace statistic = 1.704, P < 0.001) with high canonical correlations found on the first two axes (0.963 for canonical axis 1, 0.719 for canonical axis 2).

• ∗ indicates p < 0.05 (significant) • ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01 (highly significant) • ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 (very highly significant) • ∗∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.0001 (extremely highly significant) • ns indicates p ≥ 0.05 (not significant) For the p-value test, a smaller value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting a more significant difference between the methods.

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were observed for reaction to both pathogens in both years.

The values of the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), the modified coefficient of determination (Adj‐ R 2 ) and the expected coefficient of determination (Pred‐ R 2 ) of the quadratic model were, among other models, the highest and highly significant ( p < .001), except for the cubic model, which was aliased or confounded.