“highly significant”

In addition, examination of prostate cell lines showed a highly significant difference in PIM1 expression between the tERG positive and negative cell lines (p<0.001) ( Fig. 2B ).

Risk and management intensity Regression analysis in Figure 3 indicates the highly significant linear relation between risk and management intensity indexes (R2 = 0.433, P<0.001).

BLL was found to have highly significant difference between both the groups ( P < 0.001).

For the 8-OHdG levels, lycopene showed a highly significant reduction in scores at the first week when compared to the other two groups ( P <0.001).

Pearson Chi-square (χ 2 ) and Freeman–Halton extension of Fisher exact probability test revealed a very highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between each of the cytological grading systems and SBR's histological grading system.

A one-way ANOVA performed on the mean emotion identification times with repeated measures of emotion type ( anger, disgust, fear , happiness , sadness and neutral ) revealed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (5, 190) = 113.68; p < 0.001].

The tcp15-3 mutant showed a mild but highly significant reduction in inflorescence height (Student's t- test, P < 0.001) ( Figure 2A ).

However, after adjustment for type of surgery this difference was reduced to 3 years, but it was still highly significant (p < 0.001).

The AUROC curve was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for quadruple (AUROC, 0.966; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.940-0.991) and triple tests (AUROC, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.927-0.983).

(Note that the mixed model is in this case mathematically identical to a General Linear Model.) This model showed a highly significant effect of software on the average latency, F (2786) = 2374, p <.001.

Behavioural results A 2-way ANOVA including emotion and odour as factors revealed a highly significant emotion main effect (F = 85.606; p < 0.001; Greenhouse-Geisser corrected).

Statistical significance (p<0.05) is indicated by a single asterisks or double asterisks if highly significant (p<0.001).

When estimating the density of TH- and DAT-reactive fibers in the rat striatum, the two different doses of 6-OHDA resulted in highly significant unilateral decrease in the striatal fiber density at both 2 and 4 weeks post-lesion as compared to the intact rat striatum (one-way ANOVA ( P < 0.001, F 4,22 = 32.564 (TH) and F 4,22 = 52.435 (DAT)) and Tukey post hoc test, n = 4 to 5 per group) (Figure 2 B,C; representative pictures in Figure 1 C,D).

Overall, survival proportions between larvae infected with the Δ argEF mutant strain or the Δ akuB strain are highly significant ( P < 0.001), which shows that the loss of ArgEF leads to reduced virulence in the G. mellonella infection model.

The in-phase relationships were highly significant ( P<0.001 ; Figs. 2 and S1 ) and cross-correlation analyses peaked at a lag of 0 year in all cases, except between sardine caches and DO where the peak occurred at +2 years.

The level of nuclear AIF immunosignal was approximately 4-fold more in MPTQ treated neuro 2a cells than untreated cells and are statistically highly significant (p<0.001) ( Figure 11D ).

Comparing pyramidal-like CA1 and CA3 ESN morphology to type B ESNs (live after 28 DIV), revealed highly significant differences between the two groups ( Fig. 1D ; p<0.001).

There was a highly significant main effect of phase, F (1, 52) = 51.64, p <.001, η p 2 = .50, indicating that participants committed more errors during the reversal phase ( M = 10.6, SD = 6.9) than the acquisition phase ( M = 2.9, SD = 2.7) ( Figure 1 ).

Analysis of the presence of these four patterns among the four treatment groups showed highly significant differences ( P <0.001) in three of them ( Figure 2 ).

high in trait impulsivity, based on median score on BIS-11) × 4 (four time points during cue exposure) repeated-measures ANOVA showed again a marginally significant main effect of drinking status ( F [1, 38] = 4.02, p = 0.052) and a highly significant main effect of cue exposure ( F [1.72, 65.18] = 16.33, p < 0.001) on craving.

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001) demonstrating the importance of CD8 + effector T cells in MVA-BN ® -HER2-mediated anti-tumor efficacy.

Preoperative LBP and radiculopathy (leg pain) was significantly present in both groups (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) having a highly significant improvement of their VAS scores (z test, P < 0.001) at 1 year.

There was a highly significant effect for the threshold parameter ( p < 0.001; in fact, none of the simulated values was larger than the observed value, making p effectively 0, see Figure 2 ), meaning that assuming the same threshold for the different conditions was an inadequate model of the observed data.

Indeed, the Egger test for funnel plot asymmetries was highly significant (p<0.001), but the non-parametric Begg-Mazumdar test was not (p = 0.14).

INR values in both groups revealed highly significant increases at the postoperative 1 st hour and postoperative 24 th hour compared to preoperative values ( P <0.001) [ Table 1 ].