Statistical significance was defined as follows: P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There is a statistically highly significant increase in total leucocytic count (TLC) and BM blasts ( p < 0.001).
Comparing the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, only rCBV and rCTH in the enhancing tumor and rCTH in a combined region consisting of enhancing tumor and edema are associated with TTP and OS, where predicting OS by means of rCTH is highly significant (p < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant (corrected p -value < 0.001) in 15 of 17 patients (88%) for both cumulants and less significant (corrected p -value < 0.01) in the other 2 patients.
The analysis revealed a significant main effect of group on the total NES score, F (4, 71) = 3.36, p = .014, η 2 =.159, and a highly significant effect on narrative comprehension, F (4, 71) = 8.02, p < .001, η 2 =.311.
Not surprisingly, there was a highly significant correlation between length and weight of ( R 2 = 0.97%; P < 0.001).
ANOVA including Bonferroni’s correction showed a highly significant relationship between PatSat and SASPA levels (p < 0.001) (Figure 2 ).
Gene set tests were highly significant for both Schmid versus wildtype and Cog versus wildtype ( p ≤0.001 in each case).
The improvement in VCSS was statistically highly significant in both groups ( P < .001 for both).
All the correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and demonstrative of very good reliability.
Despite the fact that levels of infection were somewhat lower than have been measured with other wildtype WNV strains (35.8%), stark and highly significant differences were measured when compared to WNV mutants (chi-squared, p<0.001 for all mutants relative to WNV-IC).
Patients in group L showed extremely and highly significant shorter ambulation and home-readiness times than patients in group B (3.6 ± 0.3 min and 153 ± 10.9 min vs. 159.8 ± 14.3 min and 184.6 ± 14.2 min) P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 respectively.
The higher sedation scores observed in group (F) at 15, 25, and 35 min during the procedure, and at 20 min during the PACU time were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), but only significant at 10 min ( P = 0.03) and 30 min ( P = 0.007) during the PACU time.
The drop in full-time employment was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all WFNS grades, but the return to full-time employment at follow-up was approximately twice as high in WFNS 1 and 2 patients as compared to WFNS 3–5 patients ( p = 0.001), in whom it ranged from 15.6 to 16.7% ( Table 2 ).
The difference among groups was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
However, this decrease was progressive as loss of claudin-3 in all stages of CRC ( versus normal mucosa) was highly significant (p<0.001) ( Fig-2A ).
Statistical analysis using paired sample t -test for the difference in CT and MRI tumor volume was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
A Pearson correlation between log HR tot and the compactness ratios showed a highly significant negative association among the two parameters, indicating that larger home ranges become increasingly linearly shaped (r = -0.73; 95% CI = -0.90, -0.37; p = 0.001).
Additionally in meningioma, an effect of LASP1 overexpression can be assumed as our comprehensive expression analysis revealed a highly significant (p<0.001) overexpression of LASP1 in this entity as well as in medulloblastoma.
Although the association remained highly significant ( P < 0.001), the magnitude of the effect should be interpreted with caution.
Specifically, the 200 μg/mL group showed a significant reduction in survival compared to the control (p < 0.01), while the 250 μg/mL group exhibited a highly significant reduction (p < 0.001).
There were highly significant negative correlations between TOR and lesion extent in area 2 (ρ = −.669, p<.001), hIP2 (ρ = −.652, p<.001) and the SLF (ρ = −.451, p<.001), indicating that a higher lesion load in these regions was associated with reduced tactile functions.
When compared to the control group, it was highly significant (P < 0.001).
LPS stimulation as well as incubation with lambda-carrageenan resulted in highly significant induction of TNF-α transcription compared to unstimulated control (p < 0.001 for LPS stimulation and lambda-carrageenan).
Heart rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, and Respiratory rate score at the end of 1 hour of initiation of NIV treatment >5 had a highly significant association with NIV failure. 11 , 15 In the study group, all patients having HACOR score >5 at the end of 1 hour of initiation of NIV failed NIV treatment ( p -value <0.001), and it was noticed only one patient who had a HACOR score of <5 at the end of 1 hour of initiation of NIV failed NIV treatment ( p -value <0.001).