[ 3 ] (modified) together, the dose–response association in an adjusted regression model with fixed effects is just about significant ( P = 0.03), i.e., less certain than in the original data analysis ( P < 0.000001).
← all phrases
“just about significant”
Sighted at
p=0.051
In the literature
Comparing D mean, PTV with D mean, PTV dom , the difference was just about significant at p = 0.043 whereas the difference was more significant between D mean, PTV with D mean, PTV SIP at p = 0.028 (Wilcoxon test).
Increased lactate clearance was significantly associated with decreased 28-day mortality in the TBIL ≥ 2 mg/dL group (10% lactate clearance, adjusted OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.96, P = 0.0038) and the association was just about significant in APACHE II score ≥ 35 group (adjusted OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74–1.00, P = 0.051).
The mild/moderate cases with low calcium also showed significantly lower NT-proBNP, eGFR and SpO2 than the mild/moderate cases with normal calcium; while in the severe/critical cases with low calcium showed the significantly low level of hs-cTnI and PT, the eGFR level was close to being statistically significant ( P =0.055), and AST was just about significant ( P =0.051).
Table 1 shows that the results of contrast meta-analysis are not significant (FCDR>0.05) for 10 or 14 studies per group, and just about significant with 16 studies per group.
The results of the Wilcoxon signed rank test were W = 83, n = 17, z = 1.95, area between ± z = 0.9488, P (1-tail) = 0.0256, and P (2-tail) = 0.0512 (just about significant).
In the second model, an age over 65 was considered just about significant and the severity of the COVID-19 (moderate versus mild) was independently correlated to the VTE occurrence.
For the annual series of the urban catchment, for example, a LR test of BM 2 rt against BM 1 r has a value of 3.68 and falls very short of being significant, while when the urban extent is included in the model (BM 2 ru ) the LR test against BM 1 r with a value of 3.93 is just about significant at a 95% confidence level.
Decreased snow cover (Vänersborg) was related to a short-term decrease in raw water quality, most clear regarding turbidity and just about significant regarding coliforms.