Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

3,508 sentences · 3,508 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Impact of RT dose on survival outcomes As for disease-free survival (DFS), multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative CA 19-9 value was the only factor significantly associated with DFS ( p = 0.040, Supplementary Table 1 ), whereas pathologic N stage showed marginal significance ( p = 0.063).
marginal significanceP = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Interestingly, we observed that rs4979223 ( P = 0.007), rs4978536 ( P = 0.063, with marginal significance), rs2233914 ( P = 0.039), rs10817464 ( P = 0.006) and rs10759637 ( P = 0.006) showed significantly divergent genotypic distribution between groups with mild or severe thrombocytopenia, some of which remained statistically significant after multiple test correction.
marginal significancep = .06341.3× alphagold
CNLs and TNLs We did not find a significant relationship between CMI and TNL counts ( p = .695, Figure 5d , MS region = 14.072, MS error = 86.559, F = 0.1626; Degrees of freedom from Satterthwaite's method: df region = 1, df error = 10.215), and only a marginal significance with CNL counts (Figure 5c ; p = .0634, MS region = 651.19, MS error = 150.22, F = 4.3349; Degrees of freedom from Satterthwaite's method: df region = 1, df error = 10.22).
marginal significanceP = 0.0641.3× alphagold
For example, strong leaf antioxidant capacity was observed in PR-grafted plants although the leaf ABA content was decreased by heat stress with marginal significance ( P = 0.064), and root FRAP was the lowest in MA-grafted plants despite their high root ABA contents under heat stress conditions ( Figures 3E–H , 5A–D ).
marginal significancep =0.0641.3× alphagold
While pairwise comparisons in the sigma band only reached marginal significance, very large effect sizes suggested higher sigma power during the acclimation night compared to the other conditions (acclimation vs baseline: p =0.064, d = 1.23; acclimation vs 0–100%: p =0.069, d = 1.23; acclimation vs 0–600%: p =0.100, d = 1.14).
marginal significanceP =0.0641.3× alphagold
These include delayed surgical intervention,[ 26 , 27 ] advanced age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, cognitive function, function or mobility before hip fracture, and number of pre-existing medical conditions.[ 11 , 13 , 28 ] Although we could not find a statistical significance between two groups, there was a marginal significance in one-year mortality between SCH group and control group in this study ( P =0.064).
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
n [HR: 1.999, 95% CI: 1.622–2.646, p < 0.001], poor performance status [HR: 1.463, 95% CI: 1.221–1.751, p < 0.001], and ALBI grade 2 [HR: 1.531, 95% CI: 1.285–2.823, p < 0.001] were independent predictors associated with a decreased survival; ALBI grade 3 was associated with a decreased survival at marginal significance [HR: 1.525, 95% CI: 0.967–2.38, p = 0.064] in the Cox model.
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Results Outcomes of independent sample t -tests and χ 2 -tests revealed there were no significant differences at T0 between ACT and both control conditions on all included potential moderator/predictor variables, although the difference between ACT and WL in the percentage of people working full/part-time reached marginal significance, with ACT participants working full/part-time more often than WL participants [χ 2 (1) = 3.439, p = 0.064].
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Treatment with Nezavist (20 mg/kg/dose) reduced the amount of alcohol ingested by drinking the 20% solution (2.16‐g/kg body weight, marginal significance, p = 0.064), and there was an increase in the quantity of alcohol consumed by drinking the 10% solution (also 2.16‐g/kg body weight for the 10% solution, p = 0.151 compared with vehicle‐treated animals) (Figure 1E ).
marginal significanceP = .0641.3× alphagold
In regard to Vocalization during the NI phases, however, there was only marginal significance between the occurrence rate at age 9 months and the responsiveness score at age 18 months (the estimate of standardized regression weight was −.18, P = .064); instead the path between ages 4 and 9 months (the occurrence rates) was significant and the estimate of standardized regression weight was .23 ( P = .023).
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Second, in an additional regression model to predict initial C p by using both MVPSS of the hypothalamus and the last C p of the previous trial, we found that MVPSS of the hypothalamus significantly predicted the initial C p (beta = 0.17, t = 3.38, p = 0.0007) after regressing out the effect of the last C p of the previous trial, which affected initial C p negatively with marginal significance (beta = −0.03, t = −1.85, p = 0.064).