Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

3,508 sentences · 3,508 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significanceP = 0.0641.3× alphagold
For example, strong leaf antioxidant capacity was observed in PR-grafted plants although the leaf ABA content was decreased by heat stress with marginal significance ( P = 0.064), and root FRAP was the lowest in MA-grafted plants despite their high root ABA contents under heat stress conditions ( Figures 3E–H , 5A–D ).
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Treatment with Nezavist (20 mg/kg/dose) reduced the amount of alcohol ingested by drinking the 20% solution (2.16‐g/kg body weight, marginal significance, p = 0.064), and there was an increase in the quantity of alcohol consumed by drinking the 10% solution (also 2.16‐g/kg body weight for the 10% solution, p = 0.151 compared with vehicle‐treated animals) (Figure 1E ).
marginal significancep = 0.06441.3× alphagold
Only haplotype A - G - C of rs12461727, rs73038469, and rs4803406 in LD block B2 in CYP2A7P1 and CYP2B7P1 showed a dose-response pattern and had a p value near a marginal significance level (raw p = 0.0644).
marginal significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
Consistent with Munkhbayarlakh et al.’s 2019 published data [ 14 ], ApaI (rs7975232) was also not found in association with the disease in the Taiwanese and Mongolian groups; however, the VDR FokI (rs2228570) GG genotype played significant roles in terms of conferring the risk of asthma and showed marginal significance in the Taiwan group ( p = 0.065).
marginal significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
In fact, a one-way RM ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference for AI within prism distortions (F (1.86, 20.45) = 5.091, p = 0.018; η 2 p = 0.316; 1-β = 0.74, n = 14 to achieve 1-β = 0.8; post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.004, and 5° vs 15°, p = 0.024) and only a marginal significance for MT within prism distorsions (F (2.19, 24.06) = 2.987, p = 0.065; η 2 p = 0.214; 1-β = 0.55, n = 19 to achieve 1-β = 0.8, post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.05).
marginal significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
Conner’s Teacher rating Scale (CTRS) showed a significant reduction in inattention compared to the beginning ( p = 0.07) and compared to the placebo ( p = 0.049), and the score for hyperactivity of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) decreased with a marginal significance compared to the placebo after 1 month of treatment with Pycnogenol ® ( p = 0.065).
marginal significanceP =0.0651.3× alphagold
Comparable values for TMTV, baseline IPI components, IPI category, and COO were observed between groups with high and low intratumoral CD4 + cell burden, except for a lower prevalence of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score ≥2 with marginal significance (14.5% vs. 27.4%, P =0.065) in those with low intratumoral CD4 + cells.
marginal significancep =0.0651.3× alphagold
Although trails A was selected for investigation a priori on the basis of its correlation with MRI volumes, it should be noted that the effect on trails A was modest and would only reach marginal significance ( p =0.065) if strict Bonferroni correction were applied against all five domain scores in our neurocognitive battery.