“marginal significance”

In OXYSb rats, in the right ventricle, this parameter declined starting from the age of 3 months (with marginal significance: p = 0.061), whereas in the left ventricle, it did not change with age.

However, the Shannon entropy (alpha diversity) of the liver anellome was increased with marginal significance compared with the serum anellome (0.63 ± 0.14 vs. 0.48 ± 0.22, p = 0.061) ( Figure 1 D).

Interestingly, the pre-installation and post-installation dual panel testing periods showed only marginal significance ( p-value = 0.061 ).

Multivariable Cox regression revealed that the association between rs6573816 and PFS in the male glioma patients just reach marginal significance level in a dominant model (Table 2 , HR = 1.83, 95% CI 0.97–3.45; P = 0.061).

Conversely, TT-rs2583988 genotype significantly reduced the risk of depression (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04–0.97, p = 0.046) and had a marginal significance for reduced risk of anxiety (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.05–1.07, p = 0.061).

GTR demonstrated marginal significance in both PFS ( p = 0.061) and OS ( p = 0.066).

Particularly, the interaction effects between tDCS and tRNS approached marginal significance [ F (1,9) = 4.564, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.102] indicating a potential interplay between the two modalities that did not quite reach conventional levels of statistical significance.

In addition, inflammation significantly decreased over time ( p < 0.001) and with a marginal significance, in a different manner according to the location of the lesion ( p = 0.061).

An interaction of Semantics by Anteriority [F (1.3,29.5) = 5.544, p = 0.019] indicated that semantic incongruities elicited a positivity compared to congruities only over occipital sites ( p = 0.003), with marginal significance over central sites ( p = 0.061).

Furthermore, dwell times in both the no cueing and physical cueing conditions were significantly longer than that in the verbal cueing condition ( ps < 0.001), whereas the difference between the no cueing and physical cueing conditions did not reach significance, though it approached marginal significance ( p = 0.061).

There was a marginal significance in attenuation of postprandial glucose at 90 min ( p = 0.061, ES = 0.71) and 120 min ( p = 0.094, ES = 0.24) in the EGCG group compared to the control.

When main effects of these variables were controlled for in step 3, the interaction effect of HAM-D by SI showed a marginal significance with 4.9% of additional R square (β = 1.292, p = 0.061).

After adjusting for sex, age, and BMI, these correlations were still statistically significant, except for the association of serum kynurenine/|tryptophan ratio with grip strength and PHQ2-score, which showed marginal significance ( P = 0.061 and 0.062, respectively).

A higher rate of side effects in UC showed only a marginal significance ( P = 0.061).

4C ); this difference was also observed between ypStage 0 and ypStage 1-4, but with marginal significance (p=0.061) ( Fig. 4A ).

In turn, log-total CD8 T cell count correlated positively with log-total MO (r = 0.35, p<0.001), log-classical MO (r = 0.27, p = 0.001), and log-transitional MO (r = 0.29, p = 0.001), with marginal significance with log-non-classical MO (r = 0.16, p = 0.061).

For /i/, marginal significance was observed both at 500 Hz (r=0.35, p =0.061) and at 1,000 Hz (r=0.35, p =0.062).

The effect of time on belief in free will controlling for political orientation was trending towards significance in Study 1 (p = .190) and reduced to marginal significance in Study 2 (p = .061).

Finally, the GLM analysis revealed a significant group-by-RMSSD interaction for the left anterior insular (F 1,67 = 4.980, p = 0.029, η 2 = 0.069), and showed marginal significance for the right amygdala (F 1,66 = 3.646, p = 0.061, η 2 = 0.052), respectively.

Amongst amphipods that partially consumed larvae, number of partially consumed larvae increased with prey density with marginal significance (quasipoisson GLM n = 45, ф = 0.69, Deviance 1,43 = 2.55, p = 0.061) whilst proportional partial consumption significantly decreased with increasing prey density (quasibinomial GLM n = 45, ф = 0.59, Deviance 1,43 = 21.62, p < 0.001).

Among four immune-related gene modules, GM4 activity was a risk factor for OS with a marginal significance in both two datasets ( GSE32062 : HR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.88, P = 0.061; TCGA: HR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.97-1.98, P = 0.074; Figures 2A, B ).

The addition of the interactions yielded only marginal significance ( F (2, 109) = 2.87, p = .061).

The cetuximab → bevacizumab group also had longer OS than the bevacizumab → cetuximab group among patients with right‐sided tumors with marginal significance (HR: 95% CI:, P = 0.061), which is contradictory to the relationship between sidedness and EGFR first‐line treatment efficacy elucidated in several randomized trials. 29 This might be attributable to selection bias in our study, in that patients with right‐sided colon tumors that had higher surviva

In the extensive-stage SCLC group (Additional file 1 : Table S1), there was a trend toward the differential use of PCI based on age, with marginal significance ( P = 0.061).

It did reduce from significance ( p =.007) to marginal significance ( p = .061) the tendency for walkable Daybreak students to achieve more MVPA on the walk to school.