Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

5,070 sentences · 5,070 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
When MMP9, TIMP1 and RECK expression levels were analyzed according to surgical outcome, surprisingly we found that the median expression levels of MMP-9 was three times higher in children who were successfully treated by surgery ( n = 10) compared to those did not have success ( n = 6), with a marginal significance ( p = 0.072), TIMP-1 was underexpressed in 100 % of this cases ( p = 0.00) and RECK was overexpressed in 80 % of this same cases ( p = 0.082).
marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
A similar trend was observed in the HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in the HOMA index and HDL cholesterol but there was a weak correlation with marginal significance (β = 0.099 , p = 0.072) between the adiponectin ratio and ApoB/Apo AI ratio ( Table 3 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
Unifactorial and multifactorial logistic analysis Calcification, cortex, lymphatic hilum, histological grade, ER, PR, HER-2, KI-67, cT, treatment response and cN were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and ultimately we found that LNR ( p = 0.009) and PR ( p = 0.032) were the independent prognostic factors affecting 1–3 SLN-positive breast cancer patients after NAT, and the short axis of lymph node reached marginal significance ( p = 0.072) (Table 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Univariable logistic regression modeling with GSK3α/β as independent variables revealed distinct predictive capacities: Comparative analysis showed GSK3α moderately predicted bone marrow blast percentage >20% (OR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.34–5.20; p = 0.005), while exhibiting marginal significance in peripheral blood blast prediction (p = 0.073) ( Table 1 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Subgroup analysis of studies with sample size > 300 observed a low PNI was associated with a higher risk for IVIG resistance, but this association was only at a marginal significance with the random‐effect model analysis (OR = 1.08, p = 0.073) (Table 3 ).
marginal significanceP = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Compared with the control ones, Tph2 +/+ AR (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.007; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.016), ERα (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.000; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.000) and GluR4 (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.016; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.073, marginal significance) expression were down-regulated.