“marginal significance”

Additionally, DM had marginal significance ( P = .073).

Subgroup analysis of studies with sample size > 300 observed a low PNI was associated with a higher risk for IVIG resistance, but this association was only at a marginal significance with the random‐effect model analysis (OR = 1.08, p = 0.073) (Table 3 ).

Comparative analysis revealed marginal significance between X-k a and Y-k a ( p = 0.073), while X-k b versus Y-k b and X-k c versus Y-k c both exhibited high significance ( p < 0.001).

Subjects who had eyes with γPPA were younger than those without γPPA with marginal significance (70.0 ± 10.9 vs. 74.8 ± 11.9 years; P = 0.073).

Additionally, there was a marginal significance between Load 1 and Load 4 ( t (61) = 2.778, p = 0.073, Cohen's d = 0.259), and the other conditions showed a trend of becoming more negative with increasing load, but there were no statistical differences ( ts < 2.236, ps > 0.291, Cohen's d < 0.188).

A subsequent analysis showed that participants also tended to miss out more often on reward payout in the high than in the low reward condition, although the difference in number of trials quicker than the RT limit did only reach marginal significance, t (17) = 1.908, p = 0.073, 95% CI [−0.89, 17.66].

However, the previously significant edge weight difference for the Anti_G-Cons_G edge was attenuated to marginal significance after covariate adjustment ( p = 0.073).

In contrast, at 6 months post-treatment there were significant, positive correlations between vitamin B6 levels and NAA (ρ = 0.523, p = 0.007), creatine (ρ = 0.413, p = 0.040), and choline (ρ = 0.489, p = 0.013) concentrations; and vitamin B12 and creatine concentrations (ρ = 0.406, p = 0.041), whereas there was marginal significance for choline concentration (ρ = 0.359, p = 0.073).

It is worth noting that the TAS of participants working in the absence of plants was higher than that in the presence of plants at a marginal significance level [ F (1,20) =3.572, p -value =0.073, η P 2 =0.152] (see Figure 5 ).

In our experience, the use of a uterine manipulator showed marginal significance for contributing factor of PFS in the univariate analysis (p=0.074).

Besides these, treatment modality as a clinically relevant factor with marginal significance ( p = 0.074) in univariate analysis was also introduced into the Cox multivariate model.

In a further multivariate analysis, both older age and higher VAT SUVmax were associated with early AMD, though with marginal significance ( p = 0.074 and p = 0.056, respectively; Table 3 ).

Logistic regression modeling revealed trends toward a marginal significance in the percentage of Treg change from baseline to 60 days post‐HPE in the Good Outcome group (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09‐1.12; P = 0.074) and a change from baseline to 90 days post‐HPE in NK cell CD69 expression (OR, 7.87; 95% CI, 0.69‐90.04; P = 0.097).

1 − E P was larger than that of random ones with marginal significance (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 282 p = 0.074, n = 26) and 1 − E A was significantly lower (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 111, p = 0.036).

Unexpectedly, the prognosis of 8th edition N2a was better than that of 7th edition N1 and N2, with marginal significance ( P = 0.074 for N1, P = 0.033 for N2).

For E2, we found that children with detectable serum E2 levels (≥8 pg/mL) had higher [reaching marginal significance (P = 0.074)] daily intake of DEHP-tainted foods than those with non-detectable serum E2 levels (<8 pg/mL) (median (IQR) daily intake (mg/kg/day): 0.050 (0.021–0.091) vs. 0.006 (0–0.044), Figure 2b ).

We observed no statistically significant changes in mutation count from baseline to last follow-up in any other genes examined, although a marginal significance threshold for increased mutation count was observed for RAD21 ( P = .074).

The effect on prescreening visit attendance reached marginal significance, with participants in the experimental group being more likely to attend their prescreening visit (49%) than the control group (35%), X2 (1, N = 190) = 3.19, p = .074.

Besides, the main effects of group and stimulus type were significant, F (1,32) = 5.81 and 69.89, p = 0.022 and 0.000, η 2 p = 0.155 and 0.685, respectively, and interactions of group × stimulus type and stimulus type × emotion reached marginal significance, F (1,32) = 3.41 and 3.27, p = 0.074 and 0.080, η 2 p = 0.093 and 0.095, respectively.

Effects of DBH -genotype-by-condition kept the striatal cluster ( p = .012) and the cluster with the posterior cingulate cortex was in marginal significance ( p = .074), and both appeared to be driven by the sad condition.

After adding age, education, marital status, and smoking status as covariates in the further ANCOVA, the group differences remained significant on performance in immediate memory, delayed memory, language, as well as total scores of RBANS (all p < .05), and a marginal significance on performance in attention ( p = .074).

The expression of TRAF6 (either strongly positive or weakly positive) in patients showed a trend towards poorer CSS when compared with patients without TRAF6 expression and the effect achieved marginal significance ( p = 0.074) in patients with well differentiated tumors (Fig. 6c–f ).

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that positive groups of p53, PD-L1 in TCs and TAICs had a worse overall survival and a worse progression-free survival as compared with the negative groups, but marginal significance was found only in overall survival of PD-L1 in TCs and TAICs, and progression-free survival of PD-L1 in TAICs ( P =0.074, 0.097, 0.068, respectively).

7.0%, respectively, P = 0.282), and MP tended to have a greater concern about the uncertainty of new technology than LP with marginal significance (19.0% vs . 12.0%, P = 0.074).

However, the pathway where IBD activity influenced control through self-efficacy and subsequently self-management behavior showed only marginal significance ( P = 0.074).