“marginal significance”

Interestingly, our study demonstrated that the Asian or Pacific Islander ethnics background might reduce the risk of poor prognosis, with marginal significance (HR = 0.922; 95% CI, 0.844–1.007; p = 0.071).

In the FXTAS individuals with an APOε2 allele, a marginal significance was observed towards a larger decline in verbal IQ (VIQ) in individuals with an APOε4 allele compared to those without an APOε4 allele ( p = 0.071).

ANGPTL4 (≥100) predicted short OS (HR: 1.17 [0.99, 1.38]) with a marginal significance ( P = 7.1 × 10 −2 ) [Table 4 (a) and Figure 5 (A)].

But there was marginal significance between the subjects with threshold of 7 and the subjects with 6 or less ( p = 0.071).

Data from Supplementary Table 3 demonstrates highly unequal contributions of individual lifestyle factors to mortality risk: no heavy alcohol drinking (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.68, P = 0.484) and healthy diet (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74–1.06, P = 0.185) were not statistically significant; never smoking showed only marginal significance (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.68–1.02, P = 0.071); only physical activity demonstrated a consistently strong effect (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47–0.70, P < 0.001).

Hypothesis 3c: For the AWI, there was marginal significance for the interaction between Organization of Information and the Order of Information [ F (1, 17) = 3.720, p = 0.071, Figure 12 ].

Average 5hmC beta values and 5mC beta values were negatively correlated, at marginal significance ( R = -0.72; p = 0.071), with increased global 5hmC and decreased global 5mC abundance in intermediate clones (EM2, EM3, M1; Figure 2 B & C).

In our analysis of the effect of WMH pattern, we observed marginal significance in cortical thickness comparison of the temporal dWMH‐connected/unconnected cortex at high connectivity level (ratio = 0.962 ± 0.104, P = 0.071).

For washout period, a duration >30 days was linked to a lower risk of graft rejection (OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.72, P =0.004), consistent across models: Model 1 OR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.70, P =0.003), Model 2 OR=0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.78, P =0.008), Model 3 OR=0.40 (95% CI: 0.18-0.86, P =0.019), Model 4 OR=0.37 (95% CI: 0.17-0.77, P =0.008), and Model 5 OR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.75, P =0.006); Model 6 showed marginal significance (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.16-1.11, P =0.071).

Current smokers were observed to benefit less from azithromycin than former smokers with marginal significance in the logistic component of the τ ‐IBR model (MI: p = 0.071; EM: p = 0.083) and significance in the τ ‐RMST model ( p = 0.030).

Their mathematics anxiety also approached marginal significance, t (258) = 1.811, p = 0.071, Cohen’s d = 0.230.

In the case of clovamide, the quadratic model was significant overall ( p = 0.044) due to pronounced curvature effects of solvent composition and temperature, whereas time contributed minimally to model performance, with the quadratic effect of time showing only marginal significance ( p = 0.071).

Associations of a high c-Met protein expression level and MET copy number gain with patient survival In the overall cohort, high c-Met protein expression tended to associate with inferior overall survival with marginal significance (P = 0.071; Fig. 3 A; supplementary Table 1 ).

The continuous value of PM thickness was negatively associated with HCC recurrence risk with a marginal significance (coefficient = −0.089 [9% increase in recurrence risk per unit decrease in PM thickness], hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 [0.83–1.01], p = 0.071).

Further analysis revealed that cognitive dissonance significantly positively predicted anger (β = 0.338, t = 6.21, p < .001), supporting hypothesis 2a; However, the positive prediction for shame only reached marginal significance (β = 0.136, t = 1.81, p = .071), partially supporting Hypothesis 2b.

The distribution of these four significantly explanatory variables along the ordination axes was further examined by GLM, which revealed a significant correlation ( P < 0.05) of all variables along axis 1 and axis 2, except a marginal significance in bio3 along axis 1 ( P = 0.0717, Table 4 ).

Furthermore, the interaction between COVID-19 status and school level showed a marginal significance ( F (4, 1231) = 2.151, p = 0.072, η 2 = 0.007), suggesting that the effect of COVID-19 status on language proficiency may vary by school level.

A marginal significance (p = 0.072) was observed between the wGRS and guttate psoriasis.

In the normal weight subgroup (BMI <23 kg/m 2 ), intriguingly, the highest ASM group had a lower risk of incident prediabetes and T2DM in a univariate analysis (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.74; P =0.015), and this association showed marginal significance after we adjusted for covariates (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.16; P =0.072).

However, Bonferroni-corrected post hocs did not reveal significant differences among factor levels but only a marginal significance preference for the right vs left VF ( p = 0.072) in area hPE.

Although there was a marginal significance (p=0.072), the difference in complete remission rate between the two groups seemed to be the difference of prognosis after treatment.

Unlike the AU tests, the likelihood ratio test does not reject the H 0 hypothesis that the one-tree hypothesis (both genes have the same topology) is favored over the two-tree model (each gene has a different topology), although marginal significance is observed ( p = 0.072; out of the 500 replications performed 36 were found to have a smaller log-likelihood ratio statistic than the original data set, Additional file 2 ).

This over-expression was also associated with a high tumor grade with marginal significance (p = 0.072).

After adjusting for confounding variables, the EQ-5D-5L showed statistically significant differences between the two groups at 12 weeks ( β = 0.06, p = 0.046) and marginal significance at 4 weeks ( β = 0.05, p = 0.072).

However, MICT only showed marginal significance (p = 0.072) compared to HIIT (p < 0.05).