“marginally insignificant”

Emotional IPV was marginally insignificant in the Philippines.

A marginally insignificant peak for grain width and area exists on chromosome 10A (Fig. 7b , Supplementary Fig. 8 ).

Analysis with allowed variability of the explanatory variables (performed using the sensiPhy approach) showed a significant relationship with bio15 and a marginally insignificant relationship with bio14 when variability was set to the median (i.e., 50% percentile) ± 2.5%.

When all control variables were dropped, the results were also qualitatively similar, except for the coronary artery disease group, for which the effect was marginally insignificant for both outcomes of interest ( MultimediaAppendices 8 9 ).

The Egger’s test results, specifically for FIB and DD proteins, yielded marginally insignificant p-values of 0.49 and 0.18, respectively.

A 1-SD increase in precipitation was associated with a 22% (95% CI: 1% – 44%) increase in Cryptosporidium and a 24% (95% CI: −2% – 51%) increase in amoebic infections, though these effects was marginally insignificant ( Table 3 ).

Conclusion ADC and SUV metrics exhibited moderate but marginally insignificant correlation in this dataset.

The study findings only revealed marginally insignificant association between stunting and malaria in the model.

However, a systematic review of 12 articles looking partly at the outcomes of the arcuate uterus did not find any of these differences, although the relative risk was marginally insignificant at 2.04 (95% CI 0.99 to 4.1) [ 21 ].

Women covered by health insurance were less likely to undergo CS (AOR = 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.49–1.01; p = 0.056), although this was marginally insignificant at the 5 % level.

This could be a potential source of bias, and lack of control for cluster effect may underestimate the SE and turn marginally insignificant results into significant ones.

As seen in Table 5 , length of stay has a negative impact on satisfaction, albeit marginally insignificant in one equation.

Additionally, there is a marginally insignificant relationship between the rate of IVH and SB administration (OR 1.84 95% CI 0.91–3.72, p value 0.09— Figure 2 B).

The estimated coefficient corresponding to the interaction of SOPL status of “changed to NOSDC” and indicator of year 2021 is positive and marginally insignificant at the 10% level of significance (90% CI: −1.195 to 16.614; p ‐value 0.108).

Interactions on the additive scale A similar pattern of results was noted when using the linear probability model, although P values were marginally insignificant in the more disadvantaged households.

The association for the second quintile is marginally insignificant (OR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.68-1.01).

The associated risk of MALO became marginally insignificant (0.90 [0.79, 1.02]), although there were associated significant risk reductions in bleeding varices (0.79 [0.64, 0.96]), ascites and SBP (0.77 [0.65, 0.92]), and liver failure (0.85 [0.74, 0.97]). 3.4.6.

This suggests that the observed benefit of Bactrim is likely robust across key demographic and clinical factors, although the marginally insignificant results in some of the models indicate the need for cautious interpretation and further validation in larger cohorts.

KC-like was marginally insignificant and showed a relatively low ICC, indicating a more consistent response across donors.