“marginally non-significant”

This relationship was complemented by a weak, marginally non-significant positive trend between average density and depth CV (R 2 = 0.1, p = 0.06).

In oviparous females, 128C cells had larger nucleoli than 32C and 64C cells ( p < 0.001 each), yet the difference between 32 and 64C cells was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

The Levins's niche breadth in the diets of dab showed no relationship with trawling ( F 1,14 = 0.009, p = 0.926), while for plaice there was a marginally non-significant positive relationship ( R 2 = 0.278, F 1,13 = 4.616, p = 0.06; figure 4 b ).

We found that permethrin treatment had a marginally non-significant effect on hatchling mass (mass at day 0; Fig. 2D ; χ 2 = 3.68, df = 1, P = 0.06) with higher mass at day 0 in control nestlings compared to permethrin-treated nestlings.

Considering the results for the predictors of MRS total score, agreeableness (1.13 [0.21], p < 0.001), openness (–0.33 [0.11], p = 0.004) and extraversion (–0.83 [0.37], p = 0.03) demonstrated significance ( Table 4 ), while conscientiousness was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

As shown in the Table 1 , family history of BC had a marginally non-significant result (adjusted OR = 1.8, 95% CI: .7-2.6, P = .06), suggesting it may not be a leading factor in developing BC.

A similar pattern was observed in the DLPFC, although results in neuritic plaque-positive participants were marginally non-significant (p = 0.06).

In females only, SPQ-Eccentric Behavior scores were also positively associated with greater weekend time and self-report spare time on video games, with the relationship marginally non-significant ( p = 0.06).

The addition of diluted Y medium with succinate as a carbon source (succinate-only enrichments) changed the profile of the natural microbial community with a significant increase in relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria to 14.8±1.5% (Tukey honest significant difference (HSD), P -value=0.017), and marginally non-significant increases in Betaproteobacteria to 12.4±0.9% (Tukey HSD, P =0.060) and Sphingobacteria to 12.8±0.5% (Tukey HSD, P =0.055), after 14 days.

1 c), and a marginally non-significant interaction between treatment and gametocytemia (LRT χ 2 1 = 3.5, P = 0.06; Fig. 1 c).

Having medical workers within the family showed a marginally non-significant association with vaccine acceptance (71.12% vs. 66.59%, P = 0.060).

After adjusting for potential different responses according to participant age, sex, or ethnicity, image E was significantly worse than images C, D, and F ( P < .05), and worse than image B (although marginally non-significant; P = .06).

saxesenii , whose abundance tended to be higher in Georgia than in Italy, although the difference was only marginally non-significant (GLMER; Georgia: Z = −15.73, p = < 0.001; Italy: Z = 1.89, p = 0.06; Georgia vs.

In Wales, the weekend effect for hepatic failure was greater than in England, but marginally non-significant (57·3 (95 per cent c.i. −1·5 to 151·0) per cent; P = 0·060) ( Table 3 ).

Overall JHLES scores were higher among more recently enrolled students, with first-year students (2023 cohort) reporting a mean of 88.5 (SD 14.1) compared to 82.3 (SD 21.3) in the 2019 cohort, although the overall difference was marginally non-significant (F = 2.32, p = 0.06, η2 = 0.021).

Funnel plot asymmetry evaluation using the Egger’s test revealed significant asymmetry (t = 3.58; p -value < 0.002), indicating potential publication bias, while Begg’s test yielded a marginally non-significant result (z = 1.87; p -value > 0.06), suggesting weaker evidence against funnel plot symmetry (Funnel plot in Supplementary Figure S1A ).

The heterogeneity among studies was marginally non-significant ( I 2 = 19%, Q E = 20, P = 0.06).

Although post hoc testing identifies marginally non-significant differences in lag time between control and treatments in “Antarctica 3” ( p = 0.06), possibly suggesting greater initial resistance to exposure to CHX, the overall shape of the response was visually very similar to that of strains “Antarctica 1” and “Antarctica 2”.

The same trend, marginally non-significant, was observed in M . sativa ( t = -2.20, P = 0.06, S11 Table ).

Examining correlations at the between-subject level, there was a significant correlation between participants’ running fitness and their average dose ( r = 0.52, p < 0.01), and the correlation between running fitness and the total number of runs in the study period was marginally non-significant ( r = 0.31, p = 0.06).

After adjusting for confounders, the association remained robust for extraversion (B = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.04, 1.64; p = 0.039), whereas the association with conscientiousness decreased and became marginally non-significant (p = 0.060).

Incidence by month showed a modest (22%) excess of strokes in November to April (193) compared to May to October (158) (marginally non-significant, p = 0.06).

VEGF and CD had a moderate positive, marginally non-significant correlation (r = 0.34; p = 0.06), and 12% of CD was related to VEGF (r 2 = 0.12).

We observed marginally non-significant, negative correlations for both the High (Spearman’s ρ = -0.44, P = 0.06) and Low blocking groups (Spearman’s ρ = -0.39, P = 0.12).

None of the other effects in the adjusted model was statistically significant, although there were marginally non-significant trends for effects of sex ( F 1,56 = 3.81, p = 0.06, males higher, estimated marginal means±se: M 29.68±1.79, F 25.66±1.59) and local origin ( F 1,56 = 3.64, p = 0.06, non-locals higher, estimated marginal means±se: local 25.12±1.22, non-local 30.22±2.38).