“marginally significant”

IC is marginally significant at the p = 0.05 level, and therefore may indicate that IC variation observed across these extant taxa is the result of selection.

An intriguing finding is that Cum_S had a statistically significant positive correlation with CC-IMT in G2 (SLE only) that remained marginally significant (P = 0.05) in the adjusted model, whereas this correlation was reversed (still significant but somewhat weaker) in G3 (LN patients).

Gender Distribution and Analysis The chi-square test indicated a marginally significant association between gender and SBP subtype (χ2 = 5.994, df = 2, p = 0.050).

However, we observed a marginally significant difference between leaf surfaces (χ 2 = 3.82, df = 1, P = 0.05).

Genes for which a marginally significant signal for positive selection was obtained for the non-cactophilic relatives (to be conservative, we used an uncorrected p -value < 0.05) were excluded.

Grade of breast tumors is marginally significant with leptin immunostaining ( P = 0.050).

IBD and F ST class permutation test over full distance range All slopes of the regression with ln(distance) over the full range for all populations across Europe (2,518 km) and within each of the coastlines (563–1,497 km) were highly significant for either Euclidean distances or for sea current distances (Table 3 ), except for those of the Tyrrhenian Sea (not significant for Euclidean distances although marginally significant at p < 0.05 when considering sea current distances).

0.62), with a marginally significant difference ( Figures 2 B and 2C; labeled “network-based deep learning,” Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.05).

Here, a main effect for politeness, F (1,297) = 5.65, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.02 [and a marginally significant effect for compassion, F (1,297) = 4.03, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.01] emerged, suggesting that politeness was related to greater allocations across all conditions (see Supplementary Tables S3 – S5 in the Supplementary Material).

The difference in LDH mean levels between EBV positive and negative patients was marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

Differences between treatments were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at P > 0.05 and <0.10.

For diastolic d-BP, although multivariate analysis detected marginally significant time-of-day differences in 2 of the 6 age groups (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05), post hoc analyses found only one significant difference (Tukey’s test, adjusted P < 0.05) across all 2-h time bin comparisons ( SI Appendix , Fig.

Microcalcification on mammography was seen in 41.3% (19/46) of patients in the non-upgrade group and in 77.8% (7/9) of patients in the upgrade group, which indicated a marginally significant difference (p=0.05).

The association between TB and rs721917 genotypes was marginally significant ( P = 0.050), and this significance was reduced after adjusting for age and gender (Table 2 ).

In addition, a marginally significant group by time effect was found for positive adaptation coping, F (1, 46.18) = 3.94, p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03–4.65, Hedges’ g = 1.08, with the intervention group reporting improvements in positive adaptation coping from pre- ( M = 24.80, SD = 3.95) to post- ( M = 25.50, SD = 3.18) assessment compared to participants in the waitlist control group (preassessment: M = 23.57, SD = 4.89; post-assessment: M = 21.95, SD = 3.41).

Of 39 patients with a surgery background, 30 showed edema, 13 (33%) in a period greater than the median and 17 (43%) lower than the median, and this comparison was not different from the statistical viewpoint (χ 2 = 0.41; P = 0.75); notwithstanding, if we consider the average of this interval (32.4 months), the difference is marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

Turning to the demographic covariates, a marginally significant effect emerged for the unknown race and ethnicity category ( b = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.65, p = 0.05), but all other demographic coefficients were non-significant.

Indeed, Shannon index of fungal OTU relative abundances showed a marginally significant negative correlation with basal respiration ( r = −0.467, P = 0.05).

TD) on MMN amplitude at Fz was marginally significant [F (1, 42) = 4.141, p = 0.050, η 2 = 0.091].

A marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.05) was detected for this region.

All correlations between the TPB variables and added constructs are significant at p < 0.001 ( Table 3 ), with the only exception being the correlation between attitude and past behaviour in Italy, which is marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

Time effect was not significant but, even with limited amount of staff turnover data, the MBPBS condition had marginally significant effect ( p = .05) compared to the PBS condition with standardized β of − 0.22 that explained 5% of variance in these data.

Postoperative nasal packing was associated with reduced rates of diabetes insipidus and thyroid-stimulating hormone abnormalities ( P < 0.05) and a marginally significant reduction in cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea ( P = 0.05).

Non-significant correlations were observed between IC 90 values of bNAbs and age (TAB: r = 0.08, P = 0.60; ZAB: r = −0.22 , P = 0.15), years of ART (TAB: r = −0.13, P = 0.41; ZAB: r = −0.11, P = 0.47), CD4+ cell count (TAB: r = 0.17, P = 0.27; ZAB: r = −0.05 , P = 0.75), HIV-RNA (TAB: r = −0.17, P = 0.27; ZAB: r = 0.09, P = 0.55); marginally significant correlations were observed between TAB IC 90 values and years since HIV diagnosis at the time of sample collection ( r = 0.29, P = 0.05), as well as between ZAB IC 90 values and CD8+ cell count ( r = −0.32, P = 0.05).

This decline was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in 9/10 of the villages with the highest prevalence in 2011 and was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in the remaining high prevalence village (Table 1 ).