“marginally significant”

Electrode site PO7 showed a marginally significant correlation with the VWFA activation (r(17) = −.48, p = .05), whereas none of the other left hemisphere electrodes were significantly correlated.

The within-group improvements over time were statistically marginally significant (p = .05) for EDUC only (Table 2 ).

Moderation analysis indicated a marginally significant moderating effect of marital status on the intervention’s impact on overall loneliness at T3, with results favouring the MBOA group (p=0.05).

On the other hand, leaves as a food type have a positive and marginally significant effect on food intake (Estimate = −0.02, SE = 0.01, t -value = −1.95, p < 0.05).

After accounting for both weekly- and macro-level covariates (Full Model), the effect of perceived coronavirus threat on religious interest remained significant, B = 0.03, df = 4931.23, p <.001, while the effect of actual COVID-19 severity was marginally significant, B = 0.01, df = 4894.23, p =.050.

Similar to other studies, females were more strongly affected than males [ 10 ], a result that was marginally significant ( P-value = 0.05).

The effect of marriage was marginally significant, F (1, 55) = 3.91, p = .05, partial η 2 = .07.

The interaction effect between eccentricity and visual field was marginally significant, F(2,22) = 3.67, p = .05, indicating that the effect of target eccentricity was slightly larger on movements performed to the right visual field.

Compared with MAG-BERT and HyCon, BMRN has a marginally significant advantage ( p < 0.05) in Macro-F1-4 and Macro-F1-2.

Chondroitin sulfate degradation shows a marginally significant p -value ( p = 0.05).

Though significant differences were found among different age groups [ F (3, 68.9 = 08) = 4.72, p = 0.005], post-hoc analysis showed that there was only a marginally significant difference between 21–30 and 41–50 age groups ( t = 0.52, p = 0.05).

With Leuppi 2013 included, the mean difference is marginally significant at -0.91 days (95% CI = -1.81–-0.02 days, p = 0.05).

The AUC comparison for anxiety was marginally significant (Z = 1.93, p = 0.05), indicating that the Loneliness Scale was slightly more accurate in classifying this disorder.

Pairwise comparisons using Log–rank test showed that there was significant difference in PFS ( Figure 3G ) between groups A and C ( p = 0.008), but marginally significant between groups A and B ( p = 0.05) and groups B and C ( p = 0.068), based on Bonferroni–Holm method of adjustment.

There was a marginally significant inverse association in relation to breast cancer (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77–1.001; p = 0.05; I 2 = 0%; five cohort studies), but not with other cancer types ( Figure 3 B). 3.3.

Microbial beta diversity analysis showed a marginally significant difference in overall community composition across groups (R 2 = 0.033, p = 0.05).

There were marginally significant or significant two-way cross-level interactions between peer victimization and clique victimization norms for cognitive biases ( B = −0.066, SE = 0.031, p < 0.05; B = −0.068, SE = 0.031, p < 0.05; B = −0.056, SE = 0.031, p = 0.069), rather than for depressive symptoms ( Bs = −0.023~0.002, SEs = 0.018~0.021, ps > 0.05).

Additionally, vitamin A intake was higher in the TAC2 group and was marginally significant ( P < 0.05).

In addition, there were main effects of Source ( F 1,38 = 5.33, p = 0.03; indicating higher accuracy for self than other conditions) and Distortion ( F 1,38 = 54.82, p < 0.001; indicating higher accuracy for undistorted than distorted conditions), and a marginally significant Diagnosis × Source × Distortion interaction ( F 1,38 = 4.08, p = 0.05).

Marginally significant differences (p = 0.05) were observed between male cases and controls (217.52 vs. 298.17, respectively) but not within females ( Fig 1 ).

T 3 - and vehicle-injected males also showed a marginally significant difference in their preferences ( W (32) = 61, p < 0.05, d = 0.98).

PRP at 12 weeks showed a trend toward optimal results (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI: -0.38 to 1.69, p = 0.21), and the improvement at 6 months was marginally significant (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.70, p = 0.05).

No significant difference was observed in other complications, THC, LOS, and mortality rates before and after PSM although marginally significant in 1-year and 2-year mortalities after PSM ( p =0.050 and p =0.053, respectively), which need to be interpreted with caution.

There were no significant associations in the final adjusted model, though income was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

At the allelic level, a marginally significant difference was observed in the frequency of 5 and 6 alleles among HADS-A subgroups ( p = 0.05).