Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp < . 051.0× alphagold
All three messenger conditions produced statistically significant or marginally significant negative effects: President Tokayev ( β = − 0 . 074 , p < . 05 ), the Grand Mufti of Kazakhstan ( β = − 0 . 066 , p < . 05 ), and the Chief Sanitary Doctor ( β = − 0 . 063 , p < . 10 , where marginal significance indicates p-values between .05 and .10).
marginally significantP-value = 0.051.0× alphagold
There was a marginally significant reduction (χ 2 = 3.73, P-value = 0.05, OR = 2.57, 95% CI 0.97, 6.79) in the proportion of malnourished children that were malaria-positive at pre-intervention screening (20, 60.6%), compared to those that were malaria-positive at 1st post-intervention screening (7, 31.8%) after wearing pCAM.
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
marginally significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
After mental fatigue inducement, in the theta band, the interaction effect on average path length was significant ( F (3,56) = 3.239, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.148) and decreased significantly in the 15 Hz binaural beats group ( p < 0.05); the interaction effect on nodal efficiency was marginally significant ( F (3,56) = 2.568, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.121) and the 15 Hz binaural beats group showed an increasing trend ( p < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Despite this, prosthetic valve implantation (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 0.74–5.67) and prior antibiotic use (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64–2.86) continued to demonstrate high, though limited access to dental care was marginally significant (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.01–4.38, p = 0.05) (Table 7 ).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Phytoplankton C:P ratios in ambient conditions (ambient nutrients, temperature and without grazers) were higher in the larger size fraction as compared to the smaller size fraction for the highest productivity system ( p < 0.05, Figure 4 a), and marginally significant for the lowest productivity system ( p = 0.05, Figure 4 a).
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
les were significantly associated with suicidal ideation: we highlighted a protective role of enrolment before lockdown ( Table 4 , OR = 0.56 [0.4–0.78], p < 0.001; meaning that before lockdowns, the risk of suicidal ideation was halved with respect to after restrictive measures were effective) and marginally significant protection linked to enrolment during lockdown (OR = 0.58, [0.36–0.95], p < 0.05).