“marginally significant”

For cognitive depressive symptoms, the unadjusted association was marginally significant, but it strengthened in the final adjusted model (β = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56, p = 0.01).

Significant Differences in Fungal Communities Between Paleodepositional Units and Primary Core Lithologies PERMANOVA tests using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of normalized and square-root-transformed relative read abundance data revealed marginally significant differences in the fungal ASV community compositions between pre-lake and lacustrine sediments (Pseudo- F = 1.546, p = 0.01; Table 2 ).

Furthermore, when comparing body length, the significant differences in six pairs disappeared after preservation; a marginally significant difference ( p < 0.05) in one pair increased to a markedly significant difference ( p < 0.01); and differences in three pairs increased from being markedly significant to highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Although a continuous form of social network embeddedness was marginally significant at thresholds of p < 0.01 and p < 0.005, strong component-level associations were mainly identified from ROI-pairs between right frontal and occipital lobes.

Even though the effect of force levels on RRTs was at the first test marginally significant due to the huge variability across the subjects, we found a highly significant modulation of force level and trial types on the normalized scores (main effect of force condition: F (1,9) = 11.00; p < 0.01 and main effect of trial type: F (2,18) = 22.04; p < 0.001).

Particularly, marginally significant higher percentages of married/in cohabitation and not single-parent mothers agreed that vaccines are safe ( p = 0.01) (53.5 and 53.4%, respectively).

The level of shading of the dot indicates the statistical significance for support of the QTL: * P < 0.001 or reported as highly significant; * 0.001 < P < 0.01 or reported as significant; and * 0.01 < P < 0.05 or reported as marginally significant. statistically significant in some sense.

Despite the association between loneliness and interpersonal distance preference within intimate space being marginally significant in the presence of putative mediators, the overall loneliness*personal space interaction remained significant (Likelihood-ratio drop-test: χ 2 (2) = 9.21, p = .01).

For total reading times, a repeated measures 2 × 2 ANOVA with SENTENCE TYPE and BREAK LOCATION showed a significant (or marginally significant) effect of SENTENCE TYPE [ F 1(1, 47) = 8.44, p < 0.01, F 2(1, 15) = 3.02, p = 0.10].

Initial analyses revealed no significant differences in demographic or EEG characteristics between the post-stroke non-cognitive impairment (PSN) group and healthy controls (HC), with the exception of marginally significant variations in A-MMD ( p = 0.01) and B-MMD ( p = 0.03) ( Supplementary material 1 ).

3.6 Demographic history of Reaumuria songarica The neutral tests on cpDNA showed marginally significant negative values of Fu's Fs (−10.59, p < .01) and Tajima's D (−1.07, p < .1) for the entire R. songarica , suggesting that this species may have experienced a population expansion (Table S8 ).

In addition, samples from both types of permanent grassland soil were closely related, with only one case in which a PERMANOVA test indicated a clear distinction (PT16, Additional file 29 : Table S16) and two in which the test was marginally significant ( p value = 0.01, PT05 and PT17).

Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and marginally significant when 0.05 < p ≤ 0.01.

For the Brazilian sample, LAP (β = −0.20, p = 0.05) had a marginally significant influence and HAP (β = −0.40, p < 0.01) had a large influence.

We did find marginally significant differences in Shannon’s H between these populations ( P = 0.01 and 0.03 at 3,000 and 6,500 rarefaction depths, Kruskal–Wallis test).

Although the finding was marginally significant at the p < .01 level ( p = .0102), Hispanics with an immediate family member with cancer had higher odds of having been diagnosed with cancer.

Adjusted for gender and ACD respectively ODD, preschool behaviors explained 2.7% of the variance in ODD problems and 1.2% of the variance in ACD problems. Individual difficult behaviors Hot temper, disobedience, and bossiness were all significant predictors of ODD problems ( B s between 0.12 and 0.14, p s < .001), while the association with bullying was marginally significant ( B = 0.05, p = .01).

Given that a marginally significant difference occurred in the overall reaction times among the groups (F (2,256) = 7.79, p < 0.01, the RTs of the open-skill, closed-skill, and control groups were 618 ms, 638 ms, and 664 ms, respectively), the efficiency of the three attentional networks was divided by the overall RT of each participant.

In fact, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; see methods) using the reactome "Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)" gene set was marginally significant at 24 h (FDR < 25%) and highly significant at 21d (adjusted p < 0.01) (Additional file 3 ).

Additionally, a marginally significant weak negative correlation was found between the ASDR and SDI ( R = -0.09, P = 0.01) (Fig. 5 ).

Although some of the evidential value testing techniques I used to evaluate Wisman and Shrira ( 2020 ) were more novel and complex, many were not (e.g., eye-balling the implausibly repetitious “borderline/marginally significant” nature of the p values of their three focal tests, p = .01, .044, and .054, respectively).

Vitamin A was associated with a marginally significant reduction of 2.39 days (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 4.19-0.47), while zinc supplementation yielded a more pronounced effect, averaging a 3.17-day reduction (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 5.19-1.31).

20 There was a marginally significant association between race and antibody response ( P =0.01), suggesting that African Americans had slightly higher responses than whites.

The subscales lack of resources, lack of skill, and lack of willpower and were all marginally significant and positively associated ( p < 0.01; Supplementary Data ).

In the case of results on the Commentary Test and Emotional Prosody Test, group differences were at the level of marginally significant ( p < 0.01).