“marginally significant”

Households with two or more siblings and pets displayed marginally significant increased abundances of Penicillium (W = 38, p = 0.051, r = −0.008, CI 95% −0.014 to 0.0007) and Aureobasidium (W = 42, p = 0.087, r = −0.006, CI 95% −0.028 to 0.001), while those with no siblings and no pets exhibited lower overall fungal diversity.

We also observed an interaction effect between “comorbid anxiety disorder” and “sex” on 20:4 LPA [F(1,82) = 4.75; p = 0.032], and this was also marginally significant for total LPA [F(1,88) = 3.92; p = 0.051].

When we analyzed the behavioral results by sex, females showed marginally significant preferences for similar flavor‐type (one‐sided Fisher exact test, p = .051).

Early graduates rated commitment to the profession higher than recent graduates did, while commitment to the organisation was marginally significant for the year of graduation ( p = 0.051).

Our results show a marginally significant difference for prosopagnosics and Germans in featural sensitivity ( p = 0.051).

When symptoms were further classified as alarm symptoms according to the presence of one or more specific symptoms—bleeding or anemia, weight loss, dysphagia, persistent vomiting, and rapidly progressive symptoms—there was a marginally significant difference between the two groups, with a tendency for more alarm symptoms in the case group (28.7% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.051).

This difference was marginally significant for the AX-CPT task ( p = 051), but not the n-back task ( p = 0.384).

There was a marginally significant effect of “time period” on general stress scores: F (1.87,216.49) = 3.10, p = 0.051.

Comparison of plasma cortisol concentrations between months showed marginally significant differences (F (3,43) = 2.809; p = 0.051) between the first and last months of the hunting season ( Figure 1 a).

Levene’s test was marginally significant ( p = 0.051) indicating potential lack of homogeneity; however, the Brown–Forsythe correction returned equivalent outcomes, F (2,162.43) = 11.06, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.115.

Based on Wald‐type tests of each term, the air temperature had a significant relationship with the EFs ( p = .0061), the soil pH effect was marginally significant ( p = .0510) and there were no significant differences between urine types ( p = .1661).

There was a significant effect of the speed on the ESM, QL, PM, and PLL ( p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively), and there is a marginally significant effect of the speed on the ALL ( p = 0.051).

There was marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) in peak Ca 2+ levels between the control (untreated) and edelfosine-treated groups ( Fig. 6 B).

In the single variable model, septic tanks were found to be protective against mosquito presence though marginally significant (p-value = 0.051, OR = 0.13 CI: 0.01–0.98).

Similarly, BAK and BAK + ELN decreased IL-8, although this effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.051, one-tailed two-sample t -test for CTL vs.

Two way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of age ( F (1,8) = 8.322, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant age by treatment interaction ( F (1,8) = 5.283, p = 0.051).

The vigorous PA MET was marginally significant: F (1,39) = 4.06 and p = 0.051.

As Figure 7b shows, age-controlled Spearman’s correlation revealed a marginally significant correlation between greater activation and better preserved WM performance (partial ρ = 0.347, p = 0.051).

Taken alone, this correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.051), but was non-signficant following Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments for multiple testing (P = 0.322).

Results Experiment 1: AUT items as word only or word + image As regards idea fluency, we found a marginally significant effect of condition in the dual procedure (within-subject comparison), with higher number of ideas generated for word + image than word only items ( p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.144, large effect size ; Supplementary Table 1 , Fig. 1 ).

There was a marginally significant interaction between group and spatial frequency, F (1, 8) = 5.26, P = 0.051.

An additional three-way linear mixed-effects analysis revealed significant interaction effects of group × FNC × time for the connection between the left DMN-C and DAN-B ( P = 0.028), along with a marginally significant group × time interaction ( P = 0.051).

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

Our findings indicate that among participants with a BMI below 29.9, there was no noteworthy alteration observed in TG levels, while HDL demonstrated a marginally significant increase ( p = 0.051) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

The interaction between probe type and stimulus novelty condition was marginally significant, F (1, 63) = 3.94, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.06, resulting from a greater PI effect in the repeated ( M = 0.07) than unique ( M = 0.03) condition.