“marginally significant”

We also found a marginally significant negative correlation between the coverage of microstate D and prosociality [ R (53) = -0.265, p = 0.051].

The interaction between location and spectral detail was driven by a larger response to conditions containing spectral detail, when compared with those without, in the left anterior STS when compared with the right anterior STS ( t (11) = 3.359, P = 0.006) and the difference between the left posterior when compared with the right anterior STS was marginally significant ( t (11) = 2.192, P = 0.051), in the absence of a difference between the left anterior and left posterior STS ( t (11) = 0.289, P = 0.778; Fig. 2 C ).

When separated by condition, there was a comparable valence effect for the EXP-certain condition (p = 0.90); but there was a marginally significant valence effect for the EXP-uncertain (M (positive) = 4.029, M (negative) = 1.604, p = 0.051) and a significant UNEXP-uncertain (M (positive) = 4.911, M (negative) = −0.042, p < 0.001) conditions, with a larger FRN amplitude observed for negative than positive feedback. 3.2.1.2.

There was a marginally significant difference in engagement score between program duration groups (F(2)=3.23, p=0.051); the engagement score for clients who have been enrolled in the program for over two years were slightly higher than one year clients. 41% of clients attended Café before participating in any other groups; 4 of them joined other recreational & leisure groups. 3 clients later enrolled in a skill based group. 92% of respondents commented about the benefit of Café to their recovery as being “good” or “better”.

There was marginally significant association between good blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and patients with diabetes and the physical component of the perceived health (p = 0.051).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant interaction of hemisphere × MA [ F (2, 100) = 3.07, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.06].

There was a marginally significant effect of age, F (2, 42) = 3.1, p = .051, showing that the musicians group was older (26.5 years) than the bilingual (23.5 years) and the controls (22.9 years).

There was also a marginally significant 2-way interaction of face outcome and face stimuli race F (2, 35) = 3.24, p = 0.051, ƞ 2 = 0.16.

The effect for inhibition ability was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 4.11, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.108, with the high‐inhibition group showing better memory performance.

There was a marginally significant interaction between height and group ( F 1,49 = 3.99, p = 0.051; η p 2 = 0.075 Fig. 3 Top panel).

The results indicate a positive, though marginally significant, coefficient for roommate commensality ( β = 0.043, p = 0.051), while the second-category commensality is not significant.

The between-group comparison of the BDI-II item “suicidal thoughts” was marginally significant ( p = 0.051), with suicidal ideations more often reported by the non-hypoaroused group.

Honesty of Leaders’ Communication to Their Follower A two-way ANOVA on our honesty score controlling for the number of words leaders used in their e-mail to their follower, showed a marginally significant pride × moral identity interaction, F (1, 110) = 3.90, p = .051, η p 2 = .03 ( p s main effects > .26).

When we did that, for SVO the pooled analysis showed an overall effect (β = 0.069, t = 1.53, p = .013), which means the effect of the target (compared to baseline) is consistent in this condition; for S ba OV the difference between the target condition and the baseline was not statistically significant (β = 0.011, t = 0.27, p = .079); the pooled results showed a marginally significant difference between the target condition and the baseline in O, S ba OV condition (β = 0.021, t = 0.67, p = .051).).

3.2 Visual search results 3.2.1 The number of fixations A main effect of “Stimulus” was found on the number of fixations [ F (1, 89) = 106.903, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.55], and also, there was a marginally significant main effect of “Group” [ F (1, 89) = 3.079, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.06].

The Distractor Type X Lag interaction was marginally significant, F (2,39) = 3.095, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.074.

First, the main effect of language on the solidarity variable became marginally significant, B = –.13, p = .051.

Women's age group and number of living children were marginally significant (p=0.051 and p=0.061 respectively).

Households with two or more siblings and pets displayed marginally significant increased abundances of Penicillium (W = 38, p = 0.051, r = −0.008, CI 95% −0.014 to 0.0007) and Aureobasidium (W = 42, p = 0.087, r = −0.006, CI 95% −0.028 to 0.001), while those with no siblings and no pets exhibited lower overall fungal diversity.

There was a significant decrease in ZBI scores with a large ES between the pre- and post-program (Z = 2.04, ES = 0.72, p = 0.042) and a marginally significant decrease with a large ES in CES-D scores (Z = 1.94, ES = 0.69, p = 0.051).

Notably, there were marginally significant indirect effects of Volitional SE (β = .13, p = .051) and planning (β = .08, p = .053) on social distancing mediated by action control.

We included only FTO, KCNJ11, CDKL1 , and SLC30A in Tables 5A because the five SNPs (rs11643744 in FTO (model 1 p -value = 0.024 and model 2 p -value = 0.02), rs9922047 in FTO (model 1 p -value = 0.002 and model 2 p -value = 0.05), and rs2237988 in KCNJ11 (model 1 p -value = 0.013), rs4712595 in CDKL1 (model 2 p -value = 0.03 and marginally significant ( p = 0.051) for model 1, and rs13269119 in SLC30A8 (model 2 p -value = 0.04)) in these genes were found to be significant after a multiple tests correction.

And also showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.051) effect on learning.

A marginally significant effect of Aramchol 600 mg was shown in terms of NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (16.7% versus 5% in placebo, p = 0.051 OR 4.74, 95% CI 0.99–22.7), while a significant effect on fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH was not observed.

At the same time, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) indicated that the “Balanced” group exhibited the most interest in environmental friendliness.