“marginally significant”

With regard to subjective variables, the group x phase interaction was statistically significant for all variables, except for the happiness variable, for which the effect was marginally significant ( p = .051).

As seen in Table 4 , Model 2 (SE bilingual children) indicated a marginally significant effect of MOE on morpheme production accuracy ( p = 0.051).

Early graduates rated commitment to the profession higher than recent graduates did, while commitment to the organisation was marginally significant for the year of graduation ( p = 0.051).

2.0%), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Younger participants (29 years and below) had a higher proportion of limited knowledge (30.9%) compared with older groups, though the difference by age was marginally significant (p = 0.051).

Age stratification revealed younger-old (65–75) achieved 24% improvement (d = 1.38), middle-old (76–85) achieved 19% improvement (d = 1.12), and oldest-old (86+) achieved 14% improvement (d = 0.89), with age-by-time interaction marginally significant (F(2,297) = 3.02, p = 0.051) suggesting slightly attenuated but still substantial effects in oldest users.

In addition, storms also had a negative and marginally significant effect in the small islet of Binicodrell Petit (t = -2.541, P = 0.051).

A marginally significant p -value ( p = 0.051) was obtained when the relationship between HAVCR1 expression in Liver hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis was analyzed, attributed to the small sample size.

There was a marginally significant interaction between time and HIRI on Lac 3 (F = 4.338, p = 0.051, Supplementary Table S4 ), with mean comparisons indicating a decrease in Lac 3 enrichment in the HIRI group compared to the control at ZT0, but a significant increase at ZT12 post-HIRI ( Supplementary Figure S1A ).

However, for NP2-biased verbs, the difference between congruent and incongruent conditions was not significant for the high-proficiency group ( β = −0.014, SE = 0.037, t = −0.371, p = 0.711) but was marginally significant for the low-proficiency group ( β = −0.076, SE = 0.039, t = −1.951, p = 0.051).

There was a marginally significant difference in aggressive behavior (i.e., noise intensity) between the two game groups [ F (1, 47) = 4.02, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.08], such that the prosocial game group assigned lower-intensity sounds to their rivals compared to the neutral game group(see Figure 2D ).

Lifestyle factors also influenced underweight risk—not going to the gym was marginally significant (aOR: 1.21, p = 0.051).

In addition, participant in the top tertile of DOS had marginally significant higher level of FBS compared to participants in the bottom tertile (92.3 vs. 88.9 mg/dl, P = 0.051).

Some predictions were also marginally significant, as couples with more children living at home, OR = 3.17, 95% CI [1.00; 10.10], p = 0.051, tended to more often belong to Group 4 than Group 1.

When checked for differences between the two land-use types for major soil variables, a significant difference in TOC (glmm PQL; t = −2.8, p < 0.05) and a marginally significant difference in TN (glmm PQL; t = −2.0, p = 0.051), was present.

Also a marginally significant Group × Lag interaction was found, F (3, 78) = 2.71, MSE = 51.77, p = .051, η 2 p = .09, such that particularly at lags 2 and 3, non-blinkers seemed to show fewer order reversals than blinkers did.

First, the results for VGRM showed significant main effects of both fixed factors (target level: F 2,210 = 4.94, p = 0.009; spatial separation: F 4,210 = 98.18, p < 0.001) and marginally significant interaction between two factors ( F 8,210 = 2.17, p = 0.051) was observed.

In the current study, concurrent chemotherapy had a marginally significant ( p = 0.051) effect in the univariate analysis.

The No ACL group had marginally significant lower VAS than the ACL first patients ( P = 0.051) [ Table 3 ].

Although the main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F 4,99 = 2.45, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.09 ), a post hoc Bonferroni corrected t -test did not reveal any significant difference between each condition (all p s > 0.05).

The correlation between FSH and low handgrip strength was marginally significant (OR 0.390, 95% CI 0.151–1.005, P = 0.051).

A marginally significant result was found (F 26 = 4.22; p = 0.051; r 2 = 0.144).

Marital status showed a marginally significant positive effect ( β = 0.180, p =0.051, 95% CI [−0.001, 0.555]).

The difference in the attendance of religious meetings was marginally significant (t(343) = −1.957, p = 0.051), with women, on average, attending organised religious meetings (ORA) more often than men.

The effect of permissive parenting style was marginally significant ( β = 0.12, t = 1.96, p = 0.051).