“marginally significant”

Working memory mediated the relation between group and figural creativity ( Z = 2.034, P = 0.041) and was marginally significant for verbal creativity ( Z = 1.930, P = 0.053).

In another phase II DBRCT for 255 female patients with MDD, 30 units of BTA, but not 50 units, showed a marginally significant score reduction in the MADRS compared to placebo at week 6 (primary endpoint, least-squares mean±standard error: −11.6±1.4 versus −7.9±1.4, p=0.053) ( NCT02116361 ) 24 .

Global health trainings correlated with significantly higher ratings of the 'educational system' (p = 0.007) and the 'health system structure' (p = 0.007), while the item 'politics' was marginally significant (p = 0.053).

A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant STRESS × PEPTIDE interaction for the time spent in the enclosed sector-2 and the percentage of entries in the enclosed sector-2 (F2,52 = 3.25; η2 = 0.12; p = 0.047 and F2,52 =3.42; η2 = 0.18; p = 0.042, respectively), and a marginally significant STRESS × PEPTIDE interaction for the enclosed sector-1 time (F2,52 = 3.12; η2 = 0.11; p = 0.053), without any significant main effects of the factors (F < 1.0; η2 < 0.02; p > 0.40).

Although Axes 1 and 2 were constrained, Axis 2 was marginally significant (F-ratio = 6.74, p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ).

The separate ANOVA for humans only found a marginally significant effect of sound type ( F (2,42) = 3.157, p = 0.053) ( η 2 = 0.131), revealing that humans performed slightly higher on the extreme and within-category intermediate sounds than on the trained sounds.

Education was marginally significant (F=2.94, df=2/16330, p=0.053, η 2 <0.001).

Smoking showed a marginally significant association (OR = 3.020, 95% CI: 1.010–9.780, p = 0.053). 3.3.

In the MICS 2003, a greater proportion of illiterate women was exclusively breastfeeding (37%) compared to women who had some education (32.4%) which was marginally significant (p=0.053).

It can be seen that there is a marginally significant difference between the groups ( p = 0.053).

It is noteworthy that “my supervisor used my data in papers/patents without acknowledging my contribution” was also marginally significant difference ( p = 0.053) among the three major science categories. • “my supervisor took away or threatened to take away my funding” Follow up analyses of standardized residuals indicate that participants in Engineering experienced higher than expected rates of four of the five contextual behaviors: visa cancellation threats, lab stays, threats to funding and unacknowledged use of data ( Figure 2 ).

Per Protocol Logistic analyses found a marginally significant group effect when controlling for baseline (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 1.03; P = 0.053), replicating the ITT results for absenteeism (Table 2 ).

lindemuthianum -inoculation on the levels of herbivory ( p < 0.01, see Table S3 ) but not for Trichoderma strain or bean cultivar ( p > 0.05, Kruskal Wallis tests), although the exact p -values indicate ‘marginally significant’ effects ( p = 0.053 for ‘cultivar’ and p = 0.057 for ‘ Trichoderma ’).

The estimated odds ratio for the proportion of women who complete secondary school or more is marginally significant (p-value < 0.053), suggesting that a 10 percent increase in the proportion of women/peers who complete secondary school or more is associated with a two percentage point decrease in the proportion of daughters who are circumcised a generation later.

Planned comparisons indicated that the difference in P e amplitude between errors and correct responses at Fcz was marginally significant in adults, F (1,46) = 3.94, p = 0.053, older children, F (1,46) = 3.06, p = 0.087, and younger children, F (1,46) = 3.25, p = 0.078 groups, but not in the medium children group, p > 0.1.

Participants in the MBMT group showed marginally significant lower scores than those in the MI group ( p = 0.053).

That is, the effect of negative affectivity on total COBEL scores varied between the genders, β = 0.669, p = 0.034. As can be seen from Supplementary Table 1 , in boys the link between negative affectivity and olfactory reactivity and awareness was positive, although marginally significant, Spearman’s ρ = 0.247, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.62.

Although the interaction between group and sentence type was marginally significant ( p = 0.053, χ 2 = 18.143, R 2 = 0.20), the effect of group was not significant for any of the sentence types.

A chi-square analysis was performed and the effect was marginally significant, indicating increased forgetting over time [χ 2 (1) = 3.75, p = 0.053; Cramer’s φ = 0.31].

In this analysis, carboplatin dose was a marginally significant factor (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–4.29; p = 0.053).

However; there was a marginally significant effect of the COVID-19 period on body weight, with a relative weight gain of 1.5 kg ± 0.58 for the COVID group, F(4 , 59) = 578 , t = 2.0, P = 0.053, as well as a significant increase (+1.7 kg ± 1.35) in diastolic blood pressure, F(4 , 59) = 10 . 7 , t = 2.16, P = 0.035, f 2 = 0.08.

ANOVA was run in R and revealed that these differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.053) ( Figure 8 ).

This model explains 10.9% of the variance of proportion of dwell time and is marginally significant [ F (2, 53) = 3.10, p =.053; see Table 3 ].

The two-way interaction between decision-maker and moral belief was marginally significant ( F (1,250) = 3.79, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.015).

After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the positive correlation between carbohydrate intake and ALT in the HC group remained marginally significant ( P = .053) ( Figure 1d ).