Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp -value = 0.0531.1× alphagold
The percentage of households practicing open defecation in a 200 m radius had a statistically significant association with increased prevalence of underweight ( p -value = 0.021) and marginally significant association with decreased weight-for-height z -scores ( p -value = 0.053).
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
For RT, the results showed that the main effect of familiarity between the familiar condition and the novel condition [ F (1,34) = 17.30, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.37] was significant, and the main effect of appropriateness between the appropriate condition and the inappropriate condition was marginally significant [ F (1,34) = 4.02, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.11].
marginally significantp=0.0531.1× alphagold
Respondents who had challenges in hanging were less likely to use the LLIN compared to those who did not experience challenges while hanging bed nets, but this association was marginally significant (OR=0.59 95% CI: 0.35, 1.01, p=0.053), and these results are shown in Table 2 .
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Female Wealth-Signalling Products The Effect of Social Conditions on Desire for Female Wealth-Signalling Products For wealth-signalling products and the social scenario, the estimation results indicated that for subjects who were given the safe (secure) scenario, their change in desirability was on average −0.342 and marginally significant at the 5.3% level (t = −1.97, p = 0.053; equivalently, F (1,66) = 3.8804, p = 0.0531), while for those who were given the harsh (insecure) scenario, their change in desirability was on average −0.049 but was not statistically significant (F (1,66) = 0.094, p = 0.76).
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Repeated-measures ANOVA on the LPP component produced a significant main effect of electrode distribution [ F (2,41) = 8.593, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.1701], stimulus [ F (1,42) = 89.104, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.680] and a marginally significant main effect of competitive intensity [ F (2,42) = 3.155, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.131] (see Tables 2 , 3 ).