“marginally significant”

2E ). Trait variation in natural field populations The interaction between population and elevation was significant for internode length and shoot length ( Table 3 ) and marginally significant for leaf dry mass ( P = 0.053), indicating that the magnitude of response to elevation in these traits varies by population.

Analysis of the distance the rats covered in the open field revealed a marginally significant main effect for treatment (F (1,46) = 3.96, p = 0.053).

However, among those whose eGFR values declined, the relationship was marginally significant (β=0.161, P =0.053) at study baseline.

We also found a marginally significant association between male gender and having a discussion with a doctor about LCS ( P = 0.053; Table 2 ).

Among patients with different levels of the TyG index, there was a marginally significant discrepancy in the risk of MACEs (P = 0.053) ( Figure 2 ).

Adults had a higher total hit rate ( M = 85%; SD = 10) than children, M = 80%; SD = 12, t (100) = −2.04, p = .044, d = 0.40. The interaction PICTURE CATEGORY × AGE GROUP was marginally significant ( p = .053).

A two-tailed one-sample t -test comparing the combined convexity-preference scores to chance (0.5) showed a marginally significant convexity preference overall [ t (23) = 2.04, p = 0.053].

In the male group, the standard linear model showed a significant positive correlation between HDL-C and AFT (β = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.37, p = 0.005) and a marginally significant positive correlation with DSST (β = 0.11, 95% CI 0.00–0.22, p = 0.053), and a positive correlation with Sum_Score_Z (β = 0.42, 95% CI 0.02–0.81, p = 0.038).

4 , Table 2 ), and the INOC×CO2 interaction effect was marginally significant ( P =0.053).

Date of sampling was not significantly related to wing length increment ( t = 0.07, P = 0.97), whereas age of nestling is marginally significant in the model ( t = −1.98, P = 0.053).

We also noticed that CGG/CGT diplotype had an increased risk for CAD, although the P value was marginally significant (P = 0.053).

This is also compatible with IC 50 -based weak and strong binders ( p = 0.264 and p = 0.311, respectively), and with %Rank-based strong binders for which the result was marginally significant ( p = 0.053; see Supplementary Table 10 ).

For P1 latencies, the interaction of face age × participant gender was significant, F (1, 38) = 4.17, P = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.10, as latencies to peak in response to adults were significantly slower for males ( M = 147.85 ms) than females ( M = 134.97 ms, P = 0.001). N170 For N170 amplitudes, the effect of face age was marginally significant, F (1, 47) = 3.95, P = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.08.

The association between the ISI 0,120 level and WMH burden was marginally significant after additionally adjusted by model 2 (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.89, p=0.053).

In contrast, when shep is knocked down, a marginally significant increase in luciferase levels is observed ( p = 0.053), demonstrating that shep negatively affects insulator activity in the CNS.

The clinical benefit rate on retreatment also showed a marginally significant association with interval time between the two anti-EGFR based therapies (p = 0.053).

However, there was marginally significant reduction ( P = 0.053) in the level of ALT (54.5 ± 15.2 IU/l) in liver homogenate in the rabbits treated with NS prior to INH treatment in comparison to INH alone.

For T2–T1, there is a marginally significant difference (p = 0.053), with the order as follows: HH group (Mean = 1.38, SD = 0.79) ≈ HN group (Mean = 1.37, SD = 0.87) > NN group (Mean = 0.97, SD = 0.53).

Sociodemographic covariates were well-balanced overall between the control and intervention groups, with marginally significant differences between the intervention and control groups on education ( p = 0.053), public housing ( p = 0.080), and marital status ( p = 0.080) at baseline (Table 1 ).

There were marginally significant associations between TASC-r total score ( B = − 0.66, SE = 0.27 , t (39) = − 2.48, adjusted p = 0.053) and TASC-r task subscale score ( B = − 1.04, SE = 0.38 , t (39) = − 2.76, adjusted p = 0.053) predicting decreased CL-ARI in the next rating.

Indeed, the contrast between the two conditions with spatial variation (Fixed and Mixed Mapping pooled) and the condition without spatial variation (Single Location) was significant on the left STG (one-tailed one-sample t (14) = 2.6687, p = 0.0092) and marginally significant on the right ( t (14) = 1.7282, p = 0.053).

Additionally, higher monthly income exhibited a marginally significant positive association (B = 0.196, p = 0.053, Exp(B) = 1.217, 95%CI [0.998, 1.484]), suggesting that individuals with higher incomes were slightly more likely to consider facial cosmetic surgery.

Conversely, treatment with 50 mg/kg GET73 increased the number of (a) alley errors in session 1 ( P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney test; Figure 4 A) with a marginally significant effect in session 2 ( P = 0.053, Mann–Whitney test), (b) swimming reversals in session 1 ( P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test; Figure 4 B), and (c) working-memory errors in session 1 ( P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney test), with a marginally significant effect in session 2 ( P = 0.080, Mann–Whitney test; Figure 4 C).

A NT-proBNP concentration >1345 ng/L was significantly predictive for the initiation of dialysis within 60 months ( Fig 2B , p = 0.008), and marginally significant within 12 months (p = 0.053).

Diet Quality with Mild Thermal Exposure and Extended Time of Thermal Exposure The two-level factorial experiment yielded significant response surface models for larval weight ( p < 0.0015, F 3,7 = 16.27), molt to 2nd instar ( p = 0.0410, F 3,7 = 4.76), molt to 3rd instar ( p = 0.0100, F 3,7 = 8.46) and a marginally significant model for survival ( p = 0.0531, F 3,7 = 4.23) ( Table 2 ).