“marginally significant”

The V30 was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

Global health trainings correlated with significantly higher ratings of the 'educational system' (p = 0.007) and the 'health system structure' (p = 0.007), while the item 'politics' was marginally significant (p = 0.053).

Socio-economic category had a marginally significant impact on the participation in screening ( p = 0.053).

Regarding the self rating of fear, a rmANOVA with time (t1, t2) and group as factors showed no significant time effect (F(1,58) = 2.815, p = 0.099), no significant group effect (F(1,58) = 0.311, p = 0.579) but a marginally significant time-by-group interaction (F(1,58) = 3.916, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.063).

Of these, lag5 was the most significant ( p = 0.003); lag3 and lag4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.053; p = 0.081).

More precisely, the contrast “Trained > Untrained” revealed a cluster localized to the left middle occipital gyrus (MNI coordinates of the peak voxel: x = −40, y = −78, z = 32 mm, T = 6.86, K E = 1,256), which was marginally significant at peak-level (FWE-corrected, p > 0.053, n.s.).

This association was marginally significant among those with high birth weight (P = 0.053).

CLMM with only arrival day as predictor variable was marginally significant based on a likelihood ratio test (χ 2 = - 3.73, d.f. = 1, P = 0.053).

The 2-day Lymphoseek injection protocol, compared with the 1-day protocol, showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.053) with respect to a reduction of 23% in the total number of SLNs removed per procedure using the GP and PGC.

There was a marginally significant effect of ratio, F (2, 104) = 3.02, p = 0.053, The Developing Mental Number Line: Does Its Directionality Relate to 5- to 7-Year-Old Children’s Mathematical Abilities? = 0.055, and a linear contrast analysis revealed a statistically significant linear trend, F (1, 55) = 4.45, p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.079, such that performance improved as ratio decreased (e.g., better performance for a ratio of 4:7 than 4:5), as expected.

However, between-group comparisons found differences in reaction time for the “faces_recent condition (U = 77.00, p < 0.035) and two marginally significant differences for the faces_old (U = 82.00, p < 0.053) and places_old conditions (U = 82.00, p < 0.053).

For Conscientiousness, the direct effect on attitudes toward climate change was found to be marginally significant, b = 0.088, SE = 0.045, z = 1.939, p = 0.053, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.00096 to 0.1770.

A NT-proBNP concentration >1345 ng/L was significantly predictive for the initiation of dialysis within 60 months ( Fig 2B , p = 0.008), and marginally significant within 12 months (p = 0.053).

However, significant or marginally significant clusters can be found in the unattended condition (permutation test with small volume correction: cluster p = 0.053 for the contralateral SC, and p < 0.001 for the ipsilateral SC.

In this analysis, carboplatin dose was a marginally significant factor (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–4.29; p = 0.053).

Additionally, eating attitudes were positively associated with rumination ( r =.23, p =.002) and catastrophizing ( r =.34, p <.001), and showed a marginally significant association with acceptance ( r =.16, p =.053).

Planning one or more strategies was significantly associated with improved adherence; early DPP adherence was marginally significant (p=0.053) as a predictor of higher DPPOS adherence in this model.

Calanoid copepods exhibited significantly higher mortality in the UV treatments compared to the non‐UV treatments, both after 2 h ( t = −2.9, p = 0.053, df = 3.5; marginally significant) and 4 h of exposure ( t = 10.9, p = 0.008, df = 2).

With increased storage time, VA exhibited a tendency (p = 0.096) for decreased retention in vitamin premixes, but VA exhibited a tendency (p = 0.076) and VB 5 was marginally significant (p = 0.053) for decreased retention during extended storage time in vitamin premixes containing choline chloride.

A marginally significant association was further observed in the validation stage with 47 cases and 48 controls using pre-diagnostic samples (OR = 1.28; 95%CI: 0.98, 2.97; p = 0.053).

The uncorrected (see below) shift across these 29 species ( S1 Table ) averaged 95.3 ± 88.2 m (95% CI) upslope which is marginally significant ( t 28 = 2.02, p = 0.053).

An unpaired t -test showed the difference to be marginally significant [ t (42) = 1.993, p = 0.053], but the associated Bayes factor analysis (see “ Statistics ”) suggested no evidence against the null hypothesis (of zero age difference; BF 10 = 1.1).

This is also compatible with IC 50 -based weak and strong binders ( p = 0.264 and p = 0.311, respectively), and with %Rank-based strong binders for which the result was marginally significant ( p = 0.053; see Supplementary Table 10 ).

The simple slope of mu suppression at C4 in the Video-Only condition when controlling for all the other variables was marginally significant (β = −0.15 [−0.30, −0.00], t = −1.94, P = 0.053).

The Hispanic group also showed a strong but marginally significant trend toward lower odds [Exp(B) = 0.518, p = 0.053], reinforcing the pattern of minority groups facing sleep disadvantages.