“marginally significant”

The interaction between Time and Group was marginally significant, F (1, 60) = 3.87, p = 0.054, η 2 p = 0.061.

The main effect of Emotion was found to be significant F (2, 219) = 55.44 p < 0.001 (partial η 2 = 0.43) and the interaction of Group and Emotion was found to be marginally significant F (2, 219) = 2.57 p = 0.054 (partial η 2 = 0.03; Figure 7 ).

Following up this effect, pair-wise comparisons using Bonferroni correction revealed a significant difference between Training level 1 ( M = 0.01, SD = 0.03) and Training level 3 ( M = −0.02, SD = 0.03), t (22) = 2.76, p = .028, and a marginally significant difference between Training level 2 ( M = 0.01, SD = 0.02) and Training level 3, t (22) = 2.49, p = .054, suggesting that participants with less musical training were significantly more consistent in their dominant-side velocity (positive values), while highly musically trained participants were relatively more consistent in their subdominant-side velocity (negative values).

The post-hoc multiple comparisons (Bonferroni-corrected) revealed a marginally significant difference between the four- and five-year-old children on ANS accuracy (95% Confidence Interval [−21.06, 0.14], p = 0.054), but the difference between the four- and six-year-old group was not significant (95% CI [−17.92, 2.76], p = 0.221).

pallidus for cyt b show a marginally significant difference between the mean number of haplotypes (2.50 and 1.90, respectively; U =490.5, P =0.054) and a strongly significant difference between mean number of polymorphic sites per locality (3.89 and 1.20, respectively; U =543.0, P =0.007).

The increases in survival afforded by sLP at +3 h and G-CSF were statistically significant relative to the PBS control ( p = 0.006 and p = 0.014, respectively), while survival increase by injection of sLP at +24 h was marginally significant compared to PBS ( p = 0.054).

The Goal Phase x Support condition interaction for self-reported negative emotions was marginally significant, F (1, 284) = 2.94, p = .054, d = 0.28.

Preliminary analyses showed a significant interaction between sex and BMI category with respect to the somatization score ( p = 0.003) and a marginally significant interaction between sex and BMI category for somatization case status ( p = 0.054).

hirta , we detected a marginally significant effect of ‘abundance’ ( F 1,22 = 4.148, P = 0.054).

Younger children were more likely to be underweight; however, this association was marginally significant ( p = 0.054), suggesting a possible decline in prevalence with increasing age.

The relationship between the satisfaction to work for one’s organization and the degree to which one’s work is manageable is positive at the 0.05 significance level for all regions except Region B, where the relationship is marginally significant ( p = 0.054 ).

Improvements in sleep quality and quality of life A marginally significant improvement ( p = 0.054) in overall sleep quality assessment was observed at visit 6.

When individuals were pooled by coral host taxon, global differentiation between samples was small but significant for the microsatellite data ( F ST = 0.002; P <0.001) and small and marginally significant for the mtDNA (Φ ST = 0.007, P = 0.054; Table 4 ).

Translation explained only 3.6% additional variance after lexical inference was controlled for, but the effect was marginally significant ( p = .054).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction effect of Session*Category*Treatment (F (2157) = 3.050, p = 0.054; effect size: η p 2 = 0.035; Greenhouse–Geisser-corrected due to departure from sphericity); with local and historical treatments of ambiguous artworks showing higher scores during retest session (local M = 564.30, SD = 201.43; historical M = 522.26, SD = 179.37) than the baseline, and global and historical treatment of non-ambiguous artworks showing higher scores in the retest session (global M = 537.15, SD = 172.49; historical M = 541.87, SD = 184.97) than the baseline ( Table 1 , Figure 4 and Figure 5 ).

In contrast, Southern European systems showed a smaller, marginally significant negative baseline effect (β = −3.43, p = 0.054). 3.4.

A marginally significant interaction of Time × Maternal CM load ( t Interaction = −0.77, p = 0.054, η 2 p < 0.01) indicated that women with higher CM load had lower SEA level than women with lower CM load at t 0 ( p FDR < 0.001), while these differences were not found at t 2 ( p FDR = 0.333).

In the post-policy period, there was a marginally significant difference in wealth quantiles ( p = 0.054), and a significant difference in household head education status ( p 0.025), and place of residence ( p < 0.001).

The comparisons between high-confident responses (confidence rating of 5) and less-confident responses (confidence rating below 5) in false alarms show a marginally significant difference [ F (1, 34.965) = 4.663; p = 0.054; η 2 p = 0.298] between the mean dilation to high-confident responses (2.9%) and less-confident responses (−0.78%), as depicted in Figure 5 .

The local efficiency was also greater in the healthy controls than in the schizophrenia patients, but this effect was marginally significant [ t (90) = 1.95, p = 0.054] ( Figure 2 ).

After transformation, in spite of the small sample size (n = 9) the correlation coefficient of log CD34 and CFU still remained marginally significant ( p = 0.0541) with a R 2 value of 0.4328, suggesting a possible correlation of BM CFU recovery with CD34+ cells recovery ( S2 Fig ).

1 C ) and marginally significant differences in multiple-site trial data ( p = 0.0541; Fig. 1 D ).

Treatment with HTRA1 was associated with a marginally significant increase in intracellular Ca 2+ levels (Supplementary Figure S3A , F = 3.735, p = 0.0541), while the addition of DAG1 ectodomain and full‐length GPC5 had no significant effects (Supplementary Figure S3B,C : DAG1, F = 1.170, p = 0.3963; GPC5, F = 1.511, p = 0.2770).

Within the SUB, there were no significant differences within branchpoints of DAMs within the nTg mice ( Figure 8K ), but there seemed to be a marginally significant reduction in endpoints of DAMs driven by a main effect of sex ( Figure 8L ) [ F (1,20) = 4.142, p = 0.0542; Uncorrected Fisher’s LSD, nTg Male WAT vs. nTg Female WAT, p = 0.0352].

The total effect (c path) was marginally significant ( β = .04, p = .0542), and the direct effect (c′ path) was not significant ( β = .03, p = .1195).