“marginally significant”

Pairwise comparison, with sequential SIDAK correction, indicated a significant dog × male difference ( p = 0.003) and a marginally significant difference dog × female ( p = 0.055).

This difference was significant for Intensity (Means: 4.13 and 3.58, t (40) = 4.84, P < 0.0001), Valence (Means: 5.38 and 4.74, t (40) = 6.19, P < 0.0001), Behavioral Contagion (Means: 3.91 and 3.43, t (40) = 3.32, P < 0.005) and Emotional Contagion (Means: 4.13 and 3.58, t (40) = 6.34, P < 0.0001), and marginally significant for Arousal (Means: 3.60 and 3.39, t (32) = 2.00, P = 0.055; df modified for nonequal variance).

Mediation analysis showed that the total effect of insomnia on favorable attitudes toward hypnotics was marginally significant (β = 0.08, p = 0.055), while the direct effect was not significant (β = 0.04, p = 0.32).

Group differences for self-expression were marginally significant [ H (3) = 7.60, p = .055].

The amounts of 13 C detected did not differ significantly between earlier and later sampling times ( F 1,11 = 1.222, P = 0.293) but did differ in a marginally significant way by necromass type ( F 1,11 = 4.608, P = 0.055), with greater but also more variable amounts of 13 C detected in soils under low melanin necromass.

There was a marginally significant difference in depression scores ( p = 0.055), with females having slightly higher scores (mean = 10.11 ± 4.06) than males (mean = 8.80 ± 3.18).

After adjusting for pre-treatment TTP < 216 hours, either a TDA value > 2-log killing at 4 weeks (OR = 16.84, 95% CI: 1.46–194.58, exact p = 0.02) or an increase in TDA from week 2 to week 4 (OR = 19.33, 95% CI: 1.55–241.51, exact p = 0.023) remained statistical significant, and the total TDA value at 4 weeks was marginally significant (exact p = 0.055).

Total annual precipitation was a marginally significant predictor ( β = 2590.7661, t = 2.490, p = 0.055), while average annual temperature showed a significant relationship ( β = 814,100, t = 3.522, p < 0.05).

When only data from the schizophrenic group were used, the Chlorpromazine Index showed marginally significant correlations with both performance indexes in the Standard Time Bisection task (bias: r = −0.57, p = 0.055; precision: r = −0.54, p = 0.067).

Vectorial Capacity models Assuming an equal survivorship of 0.85 for adult females from both high and low-density treatments, there was a marginally significant effect of larval competition on vectorial capacity at the 6-day IP (F = 5.65, df = 1,6; P = 0.055) but not at the 9 (F = 0.94, df = 1,6; P = 0.37) or 12-day IP (F = 0.36, df = 1,6; P = 0.56) or cVC (F = 0.20, df = 1,7; P = 0.66) (Fig 4A and 4B ).

The moderation effect was marginally significant ( t = 1.92, SE = 0.09, Bca CI (-0.004, 0.36), p = .055].

Leaf size had a marginally significant influence ( F = 6.68 , p = 0.055 ) for T. serratus R., but extraction duration had no significant effect ( p = 0.494 ).

The experimental group exhibited significant improvement in PFS ( p = 0.016) but marginally significant improvements in DCR ( p = 0.055).

VEGF-C was predictive for benefit from adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel (E-T-CMF arm) for OS (test for interaction, Wald's P = 0.038), and marginally significant for DFS (test for interaction, Wald's P = 0.055).

PERMDISP indicated that differences in dispersion among the different stand age classes were marginally significant for ground-dwelling beetles ( P = 0.055; Fig 2B ) and significant for flying beetles ( P = 0.015; Fig 2C ).

Results: Significant differences were found in the raw cognitive scores between patients and HC [semantic fluency ( t = 6.07; p < 0.001), verbal memory ( t = 6.63; p < 0.001), and executive functions ( t = 2.57; p = 0.013), and in visual memory ( t = 1.97; p = 0.055 marginally significant)].

Results for the incidence of amnestic MCI, however, showed a marginally significant higher rate for males ( p =.055).

AMH levels exhibited a marginally significant positive trend (OR 1.124; 95% CI 0.997–1.286; p = 0.055).

However, controlling for panic disorder, the score difference on PSS-10 was significant only between group C and A (i.e., C > A; p =.012), and the difference between group B and A persisted at a marginally significant level (i.e., B > A; p =.055).

A marginally significant parameter suggested that reports of more calmness were associated with activity increases ( b = 1.031, p = 0.055).

However, psychological richness showed a marginally significant relationships (β = –0.014, p = .055).

The Type-II-MANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect for Group ( F (1,17) = 2.38, p = .055).

Only GPX5 showed marginally significant differential expression with FC = 1.6 (uncorrected p = 0.055).

The difference in residual corneal thickness between the two groups was not statistically significant, but was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

The interaction between female and male age was marginally significant ( F 4,63 = 2.46, p = 0.055), suggesting a trend where the negative impact of delayed mating on fecundity was most pronounced when both partners were older.