Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp=0.0551.1× alphagold
In the model which accounted for the time-to-first event, single use of expedited programmes correlated inversely to the chance of safety events (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; p=0.009), while triple or more use had marginally significant higher risk (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.53; p=0.055).
marginally significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Paired sample t tests revealed a marginally significant decrease in AD in the multi-domain CogTr group (student’s t (16) = 2.066, two-tailed P = 0.055); conversely, no significant alteration was seen in the controls (student’s t (13) = −0.401, two-tailed P = 0.695).
marginally significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
The interaction between groups and recorded side of the tongue resulted marginally significant ( t 22 = 2.023, P = 0.055), suggesting a greater difference in DS (with respect to fluent speakers) in the spontaneous and sustained pre-TMS EMG activity, when comparing the tongue right side versus the left one ( Z = 2.845, P = 0.004; r = 0.858 - d = 0.429-).
marginally significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Subsequently, ground composition (PC1 ground) showed a positive relationship to overall prey biomass (P = 0.027, R 2 = 0.54) and a positive relationship with Hymenoptera biomass on the ground (P = 0.007, R 2 = 0.72), underlain by a marginally significant, positive, association between Hymenoptera and prey biomass from ground sampling (P = 0.055, R 2 = 0.48) ( Fig 5F ).
marginally significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Within-subjects simple contrasts (alcohol exposure was used as reference) indicated that the interaction was marginally significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline alcohol ( F [1, 38] = 3.91, p = 0.055) and significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline water ( F [1, 38] = 5.75, p < 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Also note that the degree of FP contacts (M8) exhibited significant positive associations with children’s ATL scores ( p = 0.050), and a similar result was found for the quality of FP contacts (M9), though its coefficient was considered marginally significant at the 10% level ( p = 0.055).