However, we note that it was marginally significant in univariate analyses ( p = .055), and there might have been an effect that was too small to detect with our sample size.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
MANOVA using the first nine PC scores indicated marginally significant sex differences were detected in the historical group (Pillai's trace = 0.29, F = 2.04, p = 0.055).
Whereas in the right S1 we observed marginally significant activity in the CS+ compared to the CS− (M CS+ (SEM) = 0.18(0.04), M CS− (SEM) = 0.10(0.04), p = 0.055, two-tailed), in left S1 we observed significantly greater activity in the CS− compared to the CS+ condition (M CS+ (SEM) = 0.29(0.06), M CS− (SEM) = 0.39(0.05), p < 0.05, two-tailed).
There was no difference in the total relative abundance of OTUs (Supplementary Information 1 , 2 and 3 ), but there was an indication that the microbiome diversity may have been increased in the group of T1D mothers suggested by marginally significant Simpson diversity index (Fig. 1 , F (1,14) = 4.36 , P = 0.055).
However, the overall regression model for perceived effectiveness of the default nudge was marginally significant ( p = .055).
The infants exhibited greater reactivity to the AG secretion during its presentation than to any of the other odorants, as indicated by the marginally significant Stimulus by Test Period interaction [ F (7, 119) = 2.04; p = .055; Figure 1 and Table 1 ].
For deterrence, there was solely a marginally significant interaction effect, F (1, 506) = 3.70, p = .055, η 2 = 0.01.
For general presence, the ANOVA test showed a marginally significant group difference ( F (2,27) = 3.16, p = 0.055).
Supratidal invertebrates Taxa richness in the fallout traps had a trend towards being lowest at Restore Low, but there were no significant differences, although the pairwise difference between Protect Low and Restore Low was marginally significant ( p = 0.055) ( S1 Fig , Tables 1 , 2 , S3 Table ).
The interaction term age ∗ sex was marginally significant ( F 2,39 = 3.13, p = 0.055); mRC3 expression was higher in adult females compared to adult males ( p = 0.0099; Figure 4C ). mRC4 expression did not vary with age ( p = 0.68), sex ( p = 0.77), or their interaction ( p = 0.088; Figure 4D ).
Results In our study, we addressed the following questions: a) Does fungal biomass, diversity, or community composition, differ between units with visible mold, units with no visible mold, and the outdoors? b) What taxa dominate units with visible mold? C) Do fungi forming visible colonies on surfaces become airborne and contribute to the indoor air microbiome? Fungal biomass We found that mean fungal biomass was marginally significant (ANOVA; p = 0.055) across indoor units with visible mold, indoor units with no visible mold, and the outdoors ( Fig 2 ).
A marginally significant interaction revealed that the same pattern emerged for face’s BS as well (Wald = 2.902, df = 2, p = .055).
Moreover, the ANOVA test revealed a marginally significant interaction between the reflexive and antecedent factors ( F (2, 68) = 3.022, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.011).
These factors were included in a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 39) = 3.83, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.09.
The difference in the Stroop facilitation effect between positive and negative groups was marginally significant ( F (1, 26) = 4.05, p = .055).
In the regression model with initial hsCRP as independent and initial BMI, body fat and pre-study alcohol consumption as independent variables, BMI and alcohol consumption were marginally significant ( p = 0.055 and 0.056 resp.; adjusted R 2 = 0.19, p < 0.0001; data not shown).
The interaction between female and male age was marginally significant ( F 4,63 = 2.46, p = 0.055), suggesting a trend where the negative impact of delayed mating on fecundity was most pronounced when both partners were older.
The prevalence of CP class B/C showed a marginally significant difference between these two groups ( P = 0.055).
In terms of the COPM_P, the improvement was marginally significant ( p = 0.055), with a medium effect size ( r = 0.48).
Women earning less than 500 OMR per month showed a marginally significant increase in physical health QOL (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR] = 2.614; P = 0.055; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.792; P = 0.051).
However, the priming effect in the Speech-Only condition was marginally significant, M = 11.65, SD = 54.02, F (1, 173) = 2.58, p = 0.055, Cohen's d = 1.61.
Regarding DMI, 22.2% of women with low empowerment, 11.8% with medium empowerment, and 66.0% with high empowerment experienced delayed parenthood, with a marginally significant relationship ( p = 0.055).
While the trends are similar across segments, linkers, and loops; the enrichment of mild variants in termini contributed to a marginally significant difference in the cumulative distribution as measured by the Anderson-Darling test (p = 0.055) ( S3 Fig ).
The difference was marginally significant (87.0% vs 61.9% p= 0.055).
Pairwise comparison, with sequential SIDAK correction, indicated a significant dog × male difference ( p = 0.003) and a marginally significant difference dog × female ( p = 0.055).