Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp < 0.0571.1× alphagold
For the outcome binge drinking four or more times we found marginally significant interaction between intervention x baseline lifetime binge drinking (OR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.12–1.03, p < 0.057) and with stating it would be ok if I drank more (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.16–1.12, p < 0.084,).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
After adjusting, Hispanics had 8.29 (95% CI = 1.51, 15.08; p = 0.017) more PTA days compared to whites; furthermore, Blacks had an average of 7.7 more PTA days, but this association was marginally significant (95% CI = −0.22, 15.61; p = 0.057).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
As can be seen in Table 3 , for the OQ-45 total score, a marginally significant moderating effect of type of therapy was found ( B = 0.68, t = 1.96, 95% CI: −0.02;1.39, p = 0.057), where changes in entrapment were more predictive of changes in total distress scores in the crisis intervention psychotherapy group ( B = 1.30, p < 0.001) as compared to the short-term psychotherapy outpatient group ( B = 0.62, p = 0.054).
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Physical aggression was predicted by higher observer and provocation sensitivity (marginally significant results for lower victim and perpetrator sensitivity, p = 0.057 and 0.063, respectively) in men and by higher observer, rejection, and provocation as well as by lower perpetrator and moral disgust sensitivity in women.
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
There was a marginally significant difference in all-cause mortality between BEN and non-BEN patients (35.0 vs. 45.1%, HR 0.63 [0.39, 1.02], log-rank p = 0.057) which became significant after adjustment for multiple risk factors and probable confounders (listed in Model 3 of linear regression) (aHR 0.36 [0.17, 0.79]) (Figure 1 ).
marginally significantp = .0571.1× alphagold
There was also a positive association between subjective inequality and status anxiety in Canada, r = .48, p < .001, 95% CI = [.32, .61]; England, r = .36, p < .001, 95% CI = [.19, .51]; Sweden, r = .30, p = .001, 95% CI = [.12, .46]; Japan, r = .46, p < .001, 95% CI = [.31, .59], and in South Africa, the association was marginally significant, r = .18, p = .057, 95% CI = [−.002, .35].
The Construct of Subjective Economic Inequality.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci · 2022 · PMC8652364