“marginally significant”

However, there was marginally significant differences for IQ (p = 0.057), with subjects from the INST group demonstrating a slightly higher IQ.

Furthermore, patients with PAD show statistically significant differences for HbO 2 before and after treatment (0.022±0.004 before, 0.036±0.006 after, P=0.029), while the change in THb before and after treatment is marginally significant or (0.045±0.006 before, 0.067±0.009 after, P=0.057) and the corresponding change in SO 2 is non-significant (P=0.287).

The plant species × seed volume interaction was marginally significant (Wald χ 2 1 = 3.62, p = 0.057).

We did, however, find a marginally significant relationship between Covid knowledge asymmetry and anxiety, b = .06, SE = .03, 95% CI: [-.002, .12], t (1021) = 1.90, p = .057 (H1D).

Additionally, weak or marginally significant correlations were observed for pain (r = 0.094, p = 0.057), anxiety (r = 0.080, p = 0.089), and vomiting (r = 0.079, p = 0.091).

conducted another meta‐analysis and their results indicated a marginally significant effect of the Met allele on increasing PTSD risk (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.99–1.26; p =.057).

The reduction in mitochondrial complexes I and II was marginally significant ( P =0.057 and P =0.097, respectively).

Older adults had overall smaller volumes compared to younger adults, with the largest age effects in PU ( F (1,35) = 35.5, P < 0.001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.46), and a marginally significant effect in GP ( F (1,35) = 3.85, P = 0.057, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.09).

In addition, a marginally significant decrease was found in BDI-II (Z = −2.525, p = 0.057, corrected, effect size = 0.310) and the BUT_BIC subscale (Z = −2.375, p = 0.068, effect size = 0.292), as well as a significant increase in the scores of BUT_PSDI (Z = −5.012, p < 0.001, effect size = 0.616), SF_PF (Z = −2.245, p = 0.073, effect size = 0.276), and SF_PAIN (Z = −2.597, p = 0.057, effect size = 0.319).

The VTS × Organizational Support interaction was marginally significant ( β = −.068, p = .057).

The negative link between backward scores and the DLQ was marginally significant ( r = –0.19, 95% CI = –0.37; –0.06, p = 0.057), suggesting that this WM measure may also be related to self-reported cognitive difficulties in everyday life.

A marginally significant 3-way interaction was found between time, condition, and group; F (1,19) = 4.09, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.18.

N2 Results of repeated-measures ANOVAs on N2 showed a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (1, 41) = 3.83, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.06, and the post-hoc test on condition found that the N2 amplitude of incongruent trials was significantly greater than that of the congruent trials; Post-hoc test on group found that N2 amplitude in OWs was significantly lower than that in NWs, p = 0.01. 3.3.2.

But the difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).

Moreover, we detected that the group main effect was marginally significant ( F 1,36 = 3.85, P = 0.057).

In the Bonferroni multiple comparison test, the decreased group had significantly lower depressive symptoms compared to the increased group ( P = 0.012) and had marginally significant lower depressive symptoms compared to the stable medium group ( P = 0.057) in the crude model (Model 1).

001, η 2 p = .86, and a marginally significant effect of Action-effect mapping, F (1, 38) = 3.87, p = .057, η 2 p = .092, but the interaction between these two factors was not significant, F (4, 152) = 1.39, p = .24, η 2 p = .035.

Dirty egg production showed a numerical reduction over time, with a marginally significant period effect ( p = 0.057), but no significant difference was observed between the groups ( p = 0.183).

On the other hand, in low-selected lines, the female response decreased over generations and the heritability was marginally significant (0.595, P = 0.057).

In the June 2016 sampling, the biomass was on average higher in the upper than lower soil layer, but the marginally significant soil layer × plot treatment interaction effect (P = 0.057) suggests that this difference occurred in W plots only (Fig. 1 , Table 1 ).

The focal interaction remained significant for skepticism of alternative medicine, b = 0.10, SE = 0.04, p = 0.004, and marginally significant for science beliefs, b = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.057.

Results Behavioral data The repeated-measures ANOVA for the mean RTs showed significant main effects of concept level ( F (1, 17) = 39.642, P < 0.001, η 2 P = 0.7), self-relevance ( F (1, 17) = 11.338, P = 0.004, η 2 P = 0.4) and a marginally significant interaction between concept level and self-relevance ( F (1, 17) = 4.158, P = 0.057, η 2 P = 0.197).

The multivariate analysis revealed that sex (P = 0.017), tumor location (P = 0.015), tumor multiplicity (P = 0.002) and KPNA2 expression (P = 0.018) were significantly associated with bladder recurrence (Table 2 ) and were independent risk factors for bladder recurrence.However, tumor side was marginally significant (P = 0.057) in the multivariate analysis.

This difference was marginally significant, t (41) = −1.962, p = 0.057, d = −0.350.

This analysis revealed that there was only a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 38) = 3.85, p = .057, η p 2 = .092, 95% CI [.000, .282], p(H 1 /D) = .522, a significant main effect of schedule, F (2, 76) = 18.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .330, [.155, .461], p(H 1 /D) = .987, and a significant interaction between the two factors, F (2, 76) = 7.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .169, [.034, .308], p(H 1 /D) = .502.