However, in the condition where the object which was out in the open was named Betsy retrieved the target object in 11 out of 14 trials, which was marginally significant (binomial test, P = 0.057, 2-tailed).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
This analysis revealed that there was only a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 38) = 3.85, p = .057, η p 2 = .092, 95% CI [.000, .282], p(H 1 /D) = .522, a significant main effect of schedule, F (2, 76) = 18.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .330, [.155, .461], p(H 1 /D) = .987, and a significant interaction between the two factors, F (2, 76) = 7.71, p < .001, η p 2 = .169, [.034, .308], p(H 1 /D) = .502.
All proxies decline to insignificance during extreme deficits, except for NDVI, which remains marginally significant as a measure of green biomass (t = 1.983, p = 0.057).
The use of wasta increases with education but only becomes marginally significant among respondents with master’s education or above who are more likely to use wasta compared to those with no education (OR = 1.83, p = 0.057).
The difference between public and faith-based facilities is marginally significant ( p = 0.057), and no longer so when adjusted.
Partner identity interacted with gender to produce a marginally significant trend ( F 2,19 = 3.35, P = 0.057, Fig. 2 ) in the proportion of handling attempts that ended in successful consumption of food.
Parasomnia, speech disorders, and cardiovascular disorders had higher RORs in women, while insomnia-related disorders, cognitive disorders, and movement disorders (marginally significant, p = 0.057) had higher RORs in men.
On the average grasp-point variance JA showed marginally significant differences on the memory associated condition ( M = 20.69 cm) compared to healthy controls ( M = 12.78 cm, p = 0.057, t = 1.691; an estimated 94.26% falling below JA’s score) and non-apraxic controls ( M = 12.92 cm, p = 0.055, t = 1.798; an estimated 94.50% falling below JA’s score) controls.
After controlling for education, the effect was marginally significant ( p = .057).
Additionally, we observed a trend for smokers to be more susceptible to MACE compared with nonsmokers, with a marginally significant association ( P = 0.057).
There was a marginally significant effect of age on mechanism level responses, F(2,121) = 2.936, p = .057, η p 2 = .046.
3 b), we only detected a marginally significant ( P = 0.057) direct and negative effect of hatching date on reproductive status, i.e., females born earlier in the season were more likely to become a breeder as 1-year-olds.
However, there was marginally significant differences for IQ (p = 0.057), with subjects from the INST group demonstrating a slightly higher IQ.
The plasma S100B levels for the three AMS sufferers changed from 0.100 μg/l (95 % CI −0.029 to 0.229) at baseline to 0.127 μg/l (95 % CI −0.031 to 0.284) at high altitude which was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) compared to the non-AMS sufferers who showed a non-significant ( p = 0.35) change from 0.187 μg/l (95 % CI 0.102–0.272) at baseline to 0.143 μg/l (95 % CI 0.108–0.179) at altitude.
For the outcome binge drinking four or more times we found marginally significant interaction between intervention x baseline lifetime binge drinking (OR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.12–1.03, p < 0.057) and with stating it would be ok if I drank more (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.16–1.12, p < 0.084,).
In addition, a marginally significant difference in age was found among the three groups [ F (2, 56) = 3.023, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.097], and the lCI group had higher age than the eCI group [ p = 0.094].
The plant species × seed volume interaction was marginally significant (Wald χ 2 1 = 3.62, p = 0.057).
Marginally significant differences between the presence of ehx A and the consumption of antibiotics was also observed (higher in those taking antibiotics, p = 0.057).
The main effect of Gender was marginally significant for accuracy (F(1, 58) = 3.8, p = 0.057 [p = 0.062]).
Physical aggression was predicted by higher observer and provocation sensitivity (marginally significant results for lower victim and perpetrator sensitivity, p = 0.057 and 0.063, respectively) in men and by higher observer, rejection, and provocation as well as by lower perpetrator and moral disgust sensitivity in women.
In addition, the interaction of stimulus type × emotion type × time interval × hemisphere was marginally significant, F ( 4 , 76 ) = 2.66 , p = 0.057 , η p 2 = 0.123 , indicating that the hemisphere effect of emotional vMMN varied by time interval.
The PLS analysis for the matched sample ( Figure 3 ) revealed that, the first LV explained 66.55% of the covariance and was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).
2C ), a significant decrease of cyclining_G2/M state ( p = 0.001), and a marginally significant decrease of TNF-NFκB signaling ( p = 0.057) in the NAT group.
We further tested the same effects on phenolic PSM subgroups only, as this represented most of our dataset, where we found a marginally significant increase in response to herbivory (estimate: 0.362, CI: −0.010 to 0.733, p = .057, Table S6 ) and no change in response to autumn seasonality (estimate: −0.048, CI: −0.421 to 0.324, p = .799, Table S6 ). 3.3.
For belief in the paranormal, we found significant rationality × sample (β = .35, p = .003) and experientiality × sample interactions (β = −.24, p = .036), as well as a marginally significant CRT × sample interaction (β = .21, p = .057).