“marginally significant”

Organizational justice was a marginally significant predictor, β= 0.09, p = 0.057, whereas Quality of leadership, Horizontal trust and Sense of community at work did not significantly predict sustainable employability. 4.

A Wilcoxon test verified significant increases in neutrophil percentages in mice exposed to PD2021 dust ( P = 0.029) and WI2020 dust ( P = 0.029) and a marginally significant increase in neutrophil recruitment in animals exposed to WI2021 dust ( P = 0.057) as compared to their contemporaneous controls.

The interaction between group and condition was marginally significant, F (2, 46) = 3.07, p = .057, ƞ 2 p = .12, BF = 4.

There were found marginally significant differences among regions for both morphological axes (PhylANOVA; PC1: F = 5.34, p = .057; PC2: F = 4.36, p = .071). 4 DISCUSSION The Acanthizidae form a morphologically cohesive group and in contrast to our predictions, we did not find greater morphological variability in thornbills and scrubwrens (sympatric groups) in comparison with gerygones, a clade comprising fundamentally allopatric species.

The correlation between FSH and body mass index or antihypertensive drug usage was marginally significant ( P = 0.057; P = 0.066, respectively).

However, we only observed marginally significant enrichment of H3K4me3 around 4C sites in LNCaP (p = 5.7e-2; Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fig. 5A ) and C4-2B (p = 4.24e-2; Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fig. 5A ) cells.

For Total Spectrum Frequency (ms 2 ), there was a marginally significant effect of Long run (F (1, 12) = 4.43, p = 0.057, η 2 p = 0.270).

The main effect of epoch was marginally significant, F (2.601, 36.410) = 2.865, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.170, BF 10 = 133.666, with 19 ms faster in Epoch 10 compared with Epoch 1 (651 and 670 ms of Epochs 10 and 1, respectively).

lowest AIC), BCI was only a marginally significant single predictor of the estuarine residency period of seaward migrating kelts ( P = 0.057, Table 2 ).

In the log-transformed model, the odds of not attending surgery were significantly predicted by loge(ED visits within 1 year) (β = 1.06, SE = 0.31, z = 3.43, p < 0.001), while logMAR showed marginally significant prediction of odds of missing surgery (β = 0.77, SE = 0.41, z = 1.91, p = 0.057).

“Restricting work-related social gatherings and entertainment” had a marginally significant lower RR for COVID-19 infection compared to not restricting the same (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35–1.02, p = 0.057).

In the TD group, there was a marginally significant relationship between accuracy scores and FIQ ( r (52) = .26, p = .057), such that participants with higher intelligence also had higher expression recognition scores.

Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant effects on food consumption knowledge, food consumption behavior, and QoL domains, including physical, kidney disease-specific, and total QoL scores (p < 0.05), with a marginally significant effect observed for mental health (p = 0.057).

There was a marginally significant effect of age on mechanism level responses, F(2,121) = 2.936, p = .057, η p 2 = .046.

There was a marginally significant trend between IL-1β levels and worse motor outcomes (r = -0.17, p = 0.057).

However, there was a marginally significant increase between the mean variations of IP-10 (p = 0.057) and IL-8 (p = 0.058) in the siliconized one.

001, η 2 p = .86, and a marginally significant effect of Action-effect mapping, F (1, 38) = 3.87, p = .057, η 2 p = .092, but the interaction between these two factors was not significant, F (4, 152) = 1.39, p = .24, η 2 p = .035.

Model (session x treatment) yielded that in PR, the mean number of lever presses differed across sessions ( χ 2 = 50.295, df = 6, p < 0.0001), and marginal effects indicated a significant reduction on the 4 th session (p = 0.001) and marginally significant reduction on 2 nd session (p = 0.057), as compared to the first test.

However, R was not a significant predictor of distance at high speeds ( p = 0.499; Table 5 ) and was marginally significant at moderate speeds ( p = 0.057; Table 6 ).

The linear regression for educational toys was marginally significant, F (1,159) = 3.67, p = 0.057, because again, the higher the AQ, the less likely the selection of an educational toy, see Figure 4B .

Only the responses to octenol at ZT 5–7 and 10–12 were either significantly different from chance or marginally significant (n = 20 and n = 21; 70% and 71.4% attraction; Binomial Exact test: p = 0.057 and p = 0.039, respectively).

However, in the condition where the object which was out in the open was named Betsy retrieved the target object in 11 out of 14 trials, which was marginally significant (binomial test, P = 0.057, 2-tailed).

Notably, the differential proportions of subjects with a ZBI score ≥ 41 (moderate-to-severe burden) between baseline (59.2%) and post-intervention (50.0%) was marginally significant (p=0.057).

Dunnett’s post hoc analysis detected that groups pretreated with DqTx1 ( p = 0.008), DqTx4 ( p = 0.044), and DqTx6 ( p = 0.002) showed an increase in the mean latency for the onset of seizures, and for the effect of DqTx3 was marginally significant ( p = 0.057) ( Table 2 ).

A repeated measures ANOVA on the mean amplitude values in the 800–1100 ms latency interval over the same 11 posterior electrodes for SI items with the factors Congruity, Sex and Half revealed a marginally significant three-way interaction between the factors Congruity, Half and Sex [ F (1, 34) = 3.88, P = 0.057], in the presence of a significant main effect of Congruity [ F (1, 34) = 4.51, P = 0.041].