“marginally significant”

In a multiple regression including centered and scaled age and working memory score, we found that working memory had a marginally significant effect over and above age (working memory score: β = 0.11, P = 0.058; age: β = −0.03, P = 0.62).

Diabetes mellitus was marginally significant ( p < 0.058) in a study by Chen et al, 1 but was not significant in the present study.

2 ), a marginally significant Age x Group interaction effect was observed ( F (1, 119) = 3.66, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.03).

As shown in speaker-listener rows in Table 2 , the main effect of experimental role was significant on SBP [ F (1,42) = 5.24, p = 0.027] and DBP [ F (1,42) = 15.16, p = 0.001], marginally significant on NA [ F (1,42) = 3.80, p = 0.058], but not significant on HR [ F (1,42) = 1.12, p = 0.296].

It was marginally significant for A. tricoccum , ( P = 0.058; Table 2 ).

For Task 1, all results did not differ when analyzing a subgroup of participants with full-syndrome BED (gaze direction bias: small effect sizes; gaze duration bias: large effect sizes), with the exception of the gaze duration bias test against zero in the BED subgroup in trials including unattractive food stimuli yielding only a marginally significant result ( p = 0.058). 3.3.

In a case-control study, we previously found a marginally significant inverse association with cruciferous vegetable intake among premenopausal women only (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.40, 1.01; P = 0.058) ( 22 ), whereas Gaudet et al.

Moreover, SON also increased the number of open quarter visits as a marginally significant effect of treatments was found (H = 7.493, df = 3, p = 0.058).

Surgical approach for colorectal surgery ( Figure 2 ) resulted marginally significant for OS ( p = 0.058).

The association between experiencing conflicts with parents and traditional bullying perpetration was marginally significant ( b = 0.207, SE = 0.109, p = 0.058, AME = 0.126).

A marginally significant trend was observed for A. platensis ( p = 0.058).

In 2016, differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.058), due to a high variability among samples.

Patients living in Riyadh had lower total scores (130.5±42.1 versus 150.8±57.4), which was marginally significant ( p =0.058).

Follow-up two-tailed t -tests (α = 0.025) revealed a marginally significant effect of PERTURBATION for sentences, t (1,13) = 2.077 , p = 0.058, Cohen’s d = 0.555, and no effect of PERTURBATION for lists, t (1,13) = 0.668 , p = 0.516, Cohen’s d = 0.169.

However, a marginally significant difference in RTs between the two groups for disengaging by conflict [ F (1,56) = 3.734, p = 0.058, ω 2 = 0.044], suggesting that the effects tend to be lower for AVGPs (15.52 ± 51.68) than for NAVGPs (47.49 ± 57.09) 2 , although the effect size was relatively small.

A marginally significant association was detected between ADP and HER2 positivity ( P = 0.058).

Among the variables, a large GTV in SBRT was only significantly associated with late toxicities (p = 0.038), and SBRT fractional dose was also a marginally significant factor (p = 0.058) (Table 4 ).

Decision times The main effect of fairness was marginally significant, F (1, 30) = 3.90, P = .058, η p 2 = 0.12 (see Fig. 2 ), indicating that participants completed decisions more quickly for fair offers (588.85 ± 139.46 ms) than unfair (609.01 ± 135.79 ms).

Relationships of drought-tolerance diversity with community stability were weak: We found a marginally significant positive effect of functional diversity of stomatal control on community stability ( t = 1.92, P = 0.058) but no significant relationship with functional diversity of resistance-acquisition ( t = 1.12, P = 0.27; fig.

In addition, a marginally significant negative trend between cord serum MBP and cord serum TSH (R = 0.25, p = 0.058), and cord serum MBP and cord serum T 4 (R = 0.23, p = 0.092) was observed ( Table 4 ).

There is also a marginally significant association between higher income and receiving more information to satisfaction (mean 3.26 vs mean 3.03, P =.058).

Pairwise comparisons using Tukey’s adjustment confirmed that LS caught significantly more males than CDC ( p = 0.0011), the difference between LS and UT was marginally significant ( p = 0.058), and there was no difference between CDC vs.

Only the difference between frequently and rarely-recombining autosomal genes was marginally significant (chi 2 = 3.595; P = 0.0580) for the number of genes that evolved significantly different expression in the two species.

However, we found a marginally significant crossover interaction between the 2 ( β = −0.61, SE = 0.32, P = 0.058).

Soil porosity A marginally significant third-order interaction between species, compaction and time was observed in relation to soil porosity (measured at a scale of 60 μm) (p = 0.058, n = 56; Fig 9 ).