“marginally significant”

After further adjusting our models for the covariates, only the association between the eating window and leg power remained marginally significant (0.05 ± 0.03 W/kg, p = 0.058).

A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Sex×Kissing) revealed only a significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power at the individual maximum, F(1,28) = 4.6, P<0.05, η 2 = 0.14, and a marginally significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power across 60 Hz, F(1,28) = 3.9, P = 0.058, η 2 = 0.12, indicating a higher spectral lip EMG power in women than in men.

Attention had a marginally significant effect on intercepts [ F (1, 20) = 4.0, p = .058], due to faster responses to non-rotated stimuli in the single-attention condition.

Results Training phase In the training phase, the main effect of image type on go RTs was marginally significant ( p = .058); planned comparisons revealed marginally significant differences between the stop-associated images (428 ms) and the go-associated images (422 ms), t (30) = −1.99, p = .055, g av = 0.234, and between the stop-associated images and the control images (422 ms), t (30) = −1.92, p = .064, g av = 0.242.

In a multiple regression including centered and scaled age and working memory score, we found that working memory had a marginally significant effect over and above age (working memory score: β = 0.11, P = 0.058; age: β = −0.03, P = 0.62).

A marginally significant effect of measurement ( F (1,31) = 3.864, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.111) was detected that might be the result of continued task practice. 3-Back Task Further, a 3-back task was administered to assess the persistence of WM modulations from before to after stimulation (Figure 4B ).

Total cholesterol level was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.058).

This association was marginally significant in Model_3b ( β = −0.13, p = 0.058).

The interaction between guilt communication mode and violation degree was marginally significant for investment repair, F = 2.90, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.037.

Association Between FEV 1 Trajectory and Survival Time Assessing the longitudinal impact of change of FEV 1 trajectory and survival, according to a joint model based on LMM and Cox regression analysis, demonstrated a marginally significant association between% change in FEV 1 from maximum and survival (p=0.058) ( Figure 3 ).

The restriction digest controls form high leverage points when modelling this as a function of the number of PCR cycles, leading to significant or marginally significant models ( S25A–S25C Fig ) (30xCA: p = 0.058, 20xATCT: p<0.001, 10xATCT: p<0.001; GAM).

Surgical approach for colorectal surgery ( Figure 2 ) resulted marginally significant for OS ( p = 0.058).

The association between experiencing conflicts with parents and traditional bullying perpetration was marginally significant ( b = 0.207, SE = 0.109, p = 0.058, AME = 0.126).

OA showed marginally significant lower use of rEV information [mean SD rEV r 2 values YA: 0.40 0.13, OA: 0.35 0.13, between group difference t (97) = 1.92, p = 0.058, d = 0.40], without alteration in the use of pWIN information [mean SD pWIN r 2 values YA: 0.03 0.04, OA: 0.04 0.04, between group difference t (96) = 1.27, p = 0.21, d = 0.27].

The interaction effect of POLARITY_MAIN × POLARITY_SUB was marginally significant [see Figure 2 ; F (1,16) = 4.16, p = 0.058].

Religiosity was a marginally significant predictor during the earlier time period, β = −0.38, p =.058, but a significant predictor during the later time period, β = -0.61, p =.004.

ERP Results N1 The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Emotion ( F (2,29) = 2.991, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.091).

Soil porosity A marginally significant third-order interaction between species, compaction and time was observed in relation to soil porosity (measured at a scale of 60 μm) (p = 0.058, n = 56; Fig 9 ).

The data were analysed by the Mann-Whitney U test and showed that FGF10 gene expression had a marginally significant correlation with the patient’s sex (P<0.058).

A marginally significant linear association (Fig. 2k and Supplementary Fig. 3e ; R 2 = 0.12; P = 0.058, n = 30) was observed between patient prevalence and total length of the involved gene pairs, and no significance was observed in brain and solid tumors (Supplementary Fig. 3f, g ).

This model also showed a marginally significant association between food insecurity and time (β = 0.010 [0.000, 0.020], p = 0.058), suggesting that greater food insecurity is associated with increasingly higher physical functioning scores (more decline) over time.

The results showed that removing a single connection from a hub region had a larger effect than removing a single connection from a nonhub region (hub region: 2.33 ± 0.63%; nonhub region: 1.45 ± 0.30%), although differences were marginally significant (hub region versus nonhub region: p = 0.058, t -test).

The association with severe obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ) was marginally significant (aOR 2.247, 95% CI: 0.971–5.197, p =0.058) ( Table 2 ).

In this regard, there was a marginally significant sex difference ( P= 0.058; two-tailed Fisher’s exact test), with men being more opposed than women to the community setting separate from where a community-based support group is held.

Furthermore, more frequent interpersonal communication was marginally significant in predicting value-expressive attitudes (β = 0.08, p = .058).