“marginally significant”

The regression model explained 14.0% of the variance in this criterion variable, which was marginally significant [ F (3, 49) = 2.668, p = 0.058].

3 (A)), while the main effect of the right putamen volume was marginally significant (F (2, 96) = 3.332, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.065, Fig. 3 (A)).

Relationships of drought-tolerance diversity with community stability were weak: We found a marginally significant positive effect of functional diversity of stomatal control on community stability ( t = 1.92, P = 0.058) but no significant relationship with functional diversity of resistance-acquisition ( t = 1.12, P = 0.27; fig.

Differences between profiles 2 and 4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

Patients living in Riyadh had lower total scores (130.5±42.1 versus 150.8±57.4), which was marginally significant ( p =0.058).

Additionally, the extent of surgery was marginally significant (p=0.058).

Thus, the marginally significant chi-square ( p = 0.058) for a different male–female distribution of age of seizure onset may be due to the relatively small number of females with seizures in the cohort.

The multivariate test of the multivariate analysis of variance with number of correct answers, number of words per correct answer, and seconds per correct answer was marginally significant, F (3, 47) = 2.68, p = .058, η 2 = .15.

Marginally significant association was found with social support ( β = −0.059, p = 0.058).

For the 1:2 task, left limb STS peak force differences between Earth and microgravity conditions are marginally significant ( p = 0.058, noted as # in Figure 6 ).

It yielded a significant main effect of time point [ F (1,19) = 6.87; p = 0.017] and a marginally significant main effect of synchronicity [ F (1,19) = 4.08; p = 0.058], indicating that the proprioceptive drift toward the RH tended to be larger in the condition with synchronous stroking.

In addition, statistically significant differences were found among the three treatment conditions in CBCL-Internalizing ( p < .001), CBCL-Externalizing ( p < .001), FAS-mother ( p < .001), and FAS-father ( p < .001), being marginally significant in CGAS ( p = .058).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction between male gender and secondary educational level, [209.78 (−6.94–426.51), p = 0.058].

The main effect of region was marginally significant, F (4, 80) = 3.69, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.16.

The Friedman test revealed marginally significant differences among conditions for “Anger–Hostility” ( p = 0.058) and “Confusion–Bewilderment” ( p = 0.079).

There was a significant decrease in infection prevalence from early March to late March in the sedentary population ( P = 0.024) and a marginally significant decrease in infection prevalence from early March to late March in the migrant population ( P = 0.058) ( Fig 2A ).

Present) × BMI remained marginally significant, b = −0.19, t (132) = 0.16, p = 0.058, 95% CI (−0.436, −0.008), suggesting that impulsivity does not mediate its influence on Malteser intake. 4.

ΔHbO changes At the ROI level, there was no significant interaction or main effects of “task” and “group” on the ΔHbO of both sides’ DLPFC, M1, or PMC/SMA ( p > 0.05, Table 2 ); although the I PMC/SMA showed a marginally significant interaction effect [ F (1,28) = 3.923, p = 0.058, ηp2 = 0.123].

In a multiple regression including centered and scaled age and working memory score, we found that working memory had a marginally significant effect over and above age (working memory score: β = 0.11, P = 0.058; age: β = −0.03, P = 0.62).

In a similar vein, two-sample t -tests between 6-year-old TD and 8-year-old ASD children showed a marginally significant effect for saccades between the target and the relational location, t (43.74) = 1.95, p = 0.058, but no effects for saccades between the target and the non-relational location, t (44) = 0.82, p = 0.419.

When analyses were repeated for persons with four-digit HLA typing available, HLA-A*0101 (RR=1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3, p=0.013) and HLA-C*1502 (RR=2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.9, p=0.049) were significantly associated with lesion rate, and a few others were marginally significant as well: HLA-C*0102 (RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.1, 1.0, p=0.058), HLA-C*1203 (RR =0.4, 95% CI 0.2-1.1, p=0.064) and HLA-DRB1*1104 (RR=0.2, 95% CI 0.0-1.2, p=0.070).

Interrupted or diminished physical activity during the pandemic was a marginally significant predictor of HADS Anxiety scores (β = −0.09, p = 0.058), and a trend was observed for the age variable in predicting HADS Anxiety scores (β = −0.09, p = 0.066, younger individuals with higher scores than older ones).

Changes in GIP AUC did not differ among groups ( P = 0.76); however, there was a marginally significant 7% decrease ( P = 0.058) with all groups combined.

Lastly, marital status was not significantly related to EE (F = 0.215, p = .807), but had a marginally significant effect on PA (F = 2.860, p = .058) and a significant effect on DP (F = 4.535, p = .011), suggesting that marital status may influence depersonalization ( Table 3 ).

A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Sex×Kissing) revealed only a significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power at the individual maximum, F(1,28) = 4.6, P<0.05, η 2 = 0.14, and a marginally significant main effect of Sex for average spectral power across 60 Hz, F(1,28) = 3.9, P = 0.058, η 2 = 0.12, indicating a higher spectral lip EMG power in women than in men.