4 D ) did not show any changes across conditions, but ripples showed marginally significant higher coupling with PPC than PFC spindles (rmANOVA brain area P = 0.058, F 1,2 = 15.7).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
In the subgroup analysis including more invasive surgical procedure (laminectomies involving more than three levels of instrumentation and laminectomies with tumor removal), the results remain robust, except for the postoperative bowel ileus that GDT provided promising result with marginally significant effect ( p =0.058) ( Supplement 1 ).
Effects of Stress and Housing Conditions on Locomotor Activity As shown in Figure 3 , there were marginally significant main effects of housing conditions ( F (1, 37) = 3.86, p = 0.058), but not of stress ( F (2, 37) = 1.08, p = 0.35) or of stress × housing condition interaction ( F (2, 37) = 2.56, p = 0.091).
Furthermore, 77.1% of the nurses correctly described the features of delirium with a high significance ( p < 0.001); 73.7% properly answered the feedback of hypoactive delirium with a marginally significant level ( p = 0.058) when compared with the pre-test scores (47.4%).
The correlation between SD and RA was marginally significant ( r = 0.09, p = 0.058). 3.2.
Furthermore, as expected, the males we studied showed higher mean social ADI-R score (20.1 ± 5.9) than females ([17.4 ± 5.6; although the two-sample t -test showed only a marginally significant difference between sexes ( p -value = 0.058)].
Interestingly, we found a marginally significant positive correlation between intratumor difference of T‐cell clonality and clonal TMB in LP ( P = 0.058, r = 0.94; Fig. 4D ), implying the association of clonal mutational burden and immune microenvironment.
Interestingly, 1 memory B cell subcluster (C2) with relative upregulation of MALAT1 , which was reported to be associated with viability of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell, 39 and TXNIP , which is required for expansion of germinal center B cell, 40 showed marginally significant depletion in IST non-responders ( P = 0.058; Figure 6 C–E).
Present) × BMI remained marginally significant, b = −0.19, t (132) = 0.16, p = 0.058, 95% CI (−0.436, −0.008), suggesting that impulsivity does not mediate its influence on Malteser intake. 4.
A similar trend was noted during SCWT, however this effect was marginally significant (F (1,12) = 4.39; p = 0.058). nHbT values were found to remain stable across both time points ( i.e. , Fall and Spring) across all the tests in the neurocognitive test battery (all p > 0.114; Figure 3 ).
We found there were increasing trends in the BMI mean values for most age groups in men except that the test for trend was marginally significant for men aged 50–59 ( p = 0.058).
The simple effects analysis indicated that the amplitude of P200 at Fz was greater (marginally significant) than the delayed selection ( p = 0.058) in the group with negative body image at fatness subscale, but not in the control group.
After adjusting for sociodemographic variables (sex, age, race and ethnicity, educational level, and marital status), physical activity, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, hypertension, CKD, BMI, and HbA1c in model 3, the association between Klotho and KS was marginally significant (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–1.01; p = 0.058).
Although no differences in the MMSE scores were observed, differences appeared in the comprehensive cognitive domain screen, exhibiting better performance in the Symbol Digit Test ( p = 0.032), the Digit Span Test (total) ( p = 0.058, marginally significant), and Backward digit span ( p = 0.035) in PD caregiver compared to non-caregiver.
A marginally significant treatment-by-group interaction ( F 1,26 = 3.54, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.116 ) emerged.
Diabetes mellitus was marginally significant ( p < 0.058) in a study by Chen et al, 1 but was not significant in the present study.
A marginally significant effect ( p < 0.058) of herbicide application was found for D. cinerea ( Table 2 ). 4.
Although an increase was observed in Zn group, it became marginally significant with a slight difference compared to the reference ( p =.058).
An association between prenatal low level of 25(OH) D3 and the incidence of PPD was marginally significant (β = −0.209, P = 0.058).
A marginally significant result was observed between II1 and II2 (MD = −33.69%, p = 0.058).
An ANOVA indicated that there was only a marginally significant influence of depletion on composite, overall coherence shifting, F (2,103) = 2.927, p = .058, η 2 = .053.
Moreover, linear regression analysis indicates that the decrease in CD63 intensity is marginally significant for both systems ( p = 0.058 for ON-Chip and p = 0.10 for OFF-Chip).
Age was marginally significant (OR=2.172, CI, 0.975–4.839, p =0.058).
There was a marginally significant interaction between habitat type and year on non‐native richness ( p = 0.058) in the direction of non‐native species increasing more rapidly in anthropogenic parks, but otherwise habitat type did not have a significant impact on richness, abundance, or proportion of native individuals ( p > 0.09).
These analyses revealed a marginally significant emotion effect (i.e., aversive vs. neutral) for low-vividness encoded associations in Study 1 (t (29) = 1.97, p = 0.058), which was not replicated by Study 2 (t (27) = 0.27, p = 0.787) nor Study 3 (t (27) = -1.74, p = 0.094).