“marginally significant”

The interaction of sample size with baseline severity was marginally significant, p = 0.0586, and the pattern indicated that baseline severity was somewhat more predictive for smaller than for larger studies.

The association of ACEI/ARB with log [Calc/BSA] was marginally significant ( p = 0.0586) (Fig. 3 ) Moreover, the association of diuretics with log [Calc/BSA] was significant ( p = 0.0020).

For individual group baseline to post-intervention comparisons, green tea showed a marginally significant change ( p = 0.0587), suggesting a potential trend, but the evidence was not strong enough to draw firm conclusions.

(i) MTHFR rs1801133: There was a marginally significant genotype distribution between all PsA patients and healthy controls (CC, CT, TT: 36%, 57%, and 7% versus 49%, 49%, and 2%; p = 0.0589), and PsA patients had a significantly higher frequency of the variant T-allele versus healthy controls (36% versus 26.5%; OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.01 - 2.31, p = 0.0477).

Monkeys with OFC lesions failed to show differential pupil responses during the CS and trace periods (main effect of CS, F (1,3) = 2.46; p > 0.05 for the CS period; F (1,3) = 4.65; p > 0.05 for the trace period), although they showed marginally significant pupil responses during the reward period ( F (1,3) = 8.83; p ≈ 0.0589).

The effect of arousal was marginally significant, F (1,19) = 4.04, p = .059 and the effect size was medium, r = 0.42 There was no significant interaction between valence and arousal, F (1,19) = 0.01, p = .94.

This interaction was marginally significant in ANG with respect to associative retrieval (χ 2 (1) = 3.57, p = 0.059), but not decision RT (χ 2 (1) = 0.16, p = 0.685).

However, this correlation was not found for monolinguals ( r = -0.318, p = 0.1) and was marginally significant for bilinguals when tested in their L1 ( r = 0.349, p = 0.059).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between devaluation X group X context (F 1,22 = 3.97, p = 0.059).

After adjusting for confounding factors, time × group interaction became significant for total n -6 PUFA (p = 0.026) and marginally significant for C15:0 (p = 0.059) and C16:0 (p = 0.056), and became non-significant for C17:1 (p = 0.162) and C18:3n-3 (p = 0.105).

After adjustment for percutaneous coronary intervention, previous stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction and aspartate transaminase, MPV was significantly and independently associated with HPR (OR = 2.105, 95% CI:1.175–3.771, P = 0.012), and the results of MPV tertile 3 were marginally significant (OR = 5.446, 95% CI:0.936–31.690, P = 0.059).

There was also a marginally significant effect on empathy [ t (14) = 1.89, p = 0.059, ES = 0.145], but object-related absorption did not reach a significant level [ t (14) = 0.84, p = 0.403, ES = 0.061].

Brain maintenance The regression model predicting WML volume ( F (3, 35) = 6.70, p = 0.001) revealed a significant effect of age (β = 0.51, p = 0.001; sr 2 = 0.24) and a marginally significant effect of the composite score (β = -0.26, p = 0.059).

A marginally significant correlation was observed between the first principal coordinate of functional SNVs and microbiome PC1 ( Figure 2(c ), R = 0.37, P = .059).

There was a 5%, albeit marginally significant, decrease at 0 h (4.6%, 95 CI -9.39 to 0.069, p=0.059, Fig. 5 B) that continued to decrease at 1 h relative to baseline (8.4%, 95% CI -13.19 to −3.59, p=0.001).

As shown in Figure 4 , there was a marginally significant difference between women and men in mean PSS scores, with women reporting higher scores ( t = 2, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.2).

NSAC: Comparing NSAC and LTAA DAO, the multivariate test was marginally significant (Wilks' λ 7,111 = 0.887, p = .059), with smaller volumes in LTAA DAO for the accumbens (F 1,117 = 4.17. p = .043, es = 3.4), hippocampus (F 1,117 = 6.41, p = .013, es = 5.2), pallidum (F 1,117 = 5.08, p = .026, es = 4.2), putamen (F 1,117 = 4.92, p = .028, es = 4.0),and thalamus(F 1,117 = 4.90, p = .029, es = 4.06).

Also only among men, reflection directly and positively predicted integrative self-knowledge (β = .17, p < .001); the difference between regression coefficients in men and women was marginally significant ( t = 1.89, p = .059).

A higher chronicity index in patients with relapsed LN was marginally significant (p=0.059), as shown in Supplementary Table 2 .

Mean accuracy was 0.97 ( SD = 0.04), and the effect of Condition was marginally significant, F (2, 48) = 3.01, p = .059, η p 2 = .11.

The odds of using antipsychotic during a self-harm act increased marginally significant when females used no alcohol during the self-harm act (OR = 0.823, p = .059) and when there was a history of self-harm episodes (OR = 2.409, p < .001).

A marginally significant association between cultivar resistance and response to metalaxyl was found (χ 2 = 9.10, df = 4, p = 0.059), whereas the frequency (27.4%) of metalaxyl-sensitivity among isolates collected from moderately P. infestans -resistant cultivars tended to be lower compared to susceptible (47.3%) and resistant cultivars (42.1%).

Statistically, the GABBR1 gene showed a marginally significant association between the NPC tumor and non-tumor tissue specimens (P = 0.059).

The results indicated significant main effects of the group [ F (2, 25) = 14.058, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.529, large effect size] and the discrimination location [ F (1, 25) = 47.783, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.551, large effect size], while the duration effect was marginally significant [ F (1, 25) = 3.904, p = 0.059].

However, marginally significant difference was observed between CP and AP cases ( p = 0.059).