“marginally significant”

An interaction between Group and Site was marginally significant [ χ ( 1 ) 2 = 3.57, p = 0.059].

The odds of using antipsychotic during a self-harm act increased marginally significant when females used no alcohol during the self-harm act (OR = 0.823, p = .059) and when there was a history of self-harm episodes (OR = 2.409, p < .001).

A three‐way interaction between target type, target modality, and group was also marginally significant ( F (1, 97) = 0.344, p = .059), so we further separately conducted a subsequent ANOVA analysis for both non‐SCD and SCD older adults.

Our findings presented in Table 4 revealed that increase in theta activity alongside a decrease in delta activity during treatment was associated with changes in PANSS total scores across all 5 topographical areas, with the exception of the theta-activity in the frontal area where the association was marginally significant ( P = .059).

The difference between the DLD and HFA-LI groups was marginally significant in Structure B (adjusted p = 0.059), but not significant in Structure C (adjusted p = 1.000).

The temperature effect was largely as predicted, with each 5°C increase creating a significant increase in Cmin (apart from 15°C and 20°C which was only a marginally significant difference; p = 0.059).

The differences in the proportion of the distribution of these behavioral modification stages between the control and intervention groups were significant at 3 months ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.059).

The main effect of hemisphere was marginally significant, F (1, 116) = 3.65, p = .059, η p 2 = .031, 95% CI [-.032,.093], with a trend towards faster response times in the right hemisphere ( M = 737, SD = 112) than the left ( M = 748, SD = 117).

It was observed that in the comparison between groups, children in the IG showed a statistically significant reduction in UPF consumption when compared to the CG at visit 4 (β −1.27 [95% CI: −2.28; −0.27]) and at visit 3 (β −1.11 [95% CI: −2.24; −0.27]) and marginally significant at visit 5 (β −0.99 [95% CI: −2.01; 0.04], p = 0.059).

There was a marginally significant relation of hippocampal volume with both nigral (−0.52 cm 3 , P = 0.059) and limbic (−0.38 cm 3 , P = 0.051) Lewy bodies.

Overall, a statistically significant increase was observed for the comparison of 10 seconds to 30 seconds of curing, meanwhile marginally significant (p=0.059) and no significant changes (p=0.681) were found for 10 to 20 seconds and 20 to 30 seconds comparisons, respectively.

41 The association between fatigue and depression in the present SCD sample was marginally significant ( r = 0.43; p = 0.059).

Nevertheless, there was a marginally significant difference (p = .059) between groups in the mean value of hyper-fair offers (>50% of the money offered to the other player).

Using the Spt ROIs to examine activation as a function of lag (see Figure 5 , bottom left) during recognition memory reveals a marginally significant lag effect for the AR condition [ F (2,54) = 2.97, p = 0.059; ANOVA with lag parameterized with linear and quadratic trends] but not for the VR condition ( p > 0.08); while the lag by modality interaction failed to reach significance [ F (2,54) = 2.17, p = 0.12].

At one year more SCS patients were in CCS class 1 or 2 (Table 2 ) and the difference was marginally significant at the traditional level (p = 0.059).

Comparing the two groups with linear regression analysis we found a marginally significant IPC activity by Group interaction (17 sighted controls & 19 early blind individuals, t -value = −1.95, p = 0.059, r 2 = 0.29 two-tailed, 95% CI = [−0.02, 0.0005], Fig. 6E ).

The interaction of change type and cue type was marginally significant [ F (1, 12) = 4.33, p = .059].

The results of analysing the accuracy rates showed that: (1) the main effect of cognitive effort-avoidance was significant, F (1,16) = 5.758, P = 0.029, η 2 = 0.265; and (2) the interaction effect between patient condition and cognitive effort-avoidance was marginally significant, F (1,16) = 4.120, P = 0.059, η 2 = 0.205.

Comparison of the two groups yielded marginally significant group difference in the MMN amplitude at the left mastoid electrode site (t(39)=1.94, p=0.059) but not at the right mastoid electrode site (t(39)=1.31, p=0.19).

Further adjustment for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and c-reactive protein (CRP) (Model-1B) attenuated all associations, leaving only KIM-1 marginally significant (p = 0.059).

However, based on the classification after the follow-up period, a marginally significant statistical difference could be observed between the ASD-NSIP and NSIP-Ab- groups (Figure 2 , p = 0.059).

The associations between D-ribose and MMSE became marginally significant (MMSE, β = -0.003, p = 0.059).

When we assessed the interaction between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and being a healthcare professional, we found only a marginally significant p for interaction ( p = 0.059) for test-diagnosed COVID-19 infection.

A higher chronicity index in patients with relapsed LN was marginally significant (p=0.059), as shown in Supplementary Table 2 .

Nonetheless, the Mann–Whitney test revealed a marginally significant effect of age group ( Z = -1.89, p = 0.059), which showed that a decreased tendency of selecting egocentric representation among adult participants.