Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Moreover, the education level had a marginally significant positive effect on WPH ( β = 0.052, p = 0.059), indicating that residents with a higher education level might also have had a higher WPH during the outbreak period. 4.2.
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
The interaction between the two factors, Group × Testing point, was marginally significant, F (1, 82) = 3.66, η p 2 = .04, p = .059, showing that the increase in finger use between pre‐ and post‐test tended to be higher for the experimental group (from 60.0% at pre‐test to 81.1% at immediate post‐test, +21.1%) than for the active control group (from 44.1% at pre‐test to 47.2% at immediate post‐test, +3.1%).
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
The corresponding descriptive statistics are given in Table 3 . Since the analysis for the variable “magnitude” turned out to be at least marginally significant in the overall sample, F (1, 49) = 3.731, p = .059, we checked whether this variable is relevant for the subset of trials in the SR condition which is designated for the logistic regression analysis.
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
For correct rejections, there was a marginally significant effect of Applicant Age [F (2,70) = 2.95, p = .059, η p 2 = .078], with planned comparisons confirming that participants made fewer correct rejections for adolescent compared to child [t (35) = 3.25, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.39] and adult applicants [t (35) = 3.96, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.37] but no difference between for child and adult applicants [t (35) = 0.71, p > 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.06].
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
The association between hospitalization time and brain reduction remained significant (unstandardized beta = − 0.103, t = − 2.40, p = 0.023) in the left thalamic border cluster; the association in the right thalamic border cluster was marginally significant (unstandardized beta = − 0.093, t = − 1.97, p = 0.059). 3.3.3.
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
A main effect for Group was marginally significant ( F (1, 10 = 4.54, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.312), suggesting that parent scores were greater ( M = 3.43; SD = 1.038) than those of teachers ( M = 2.68; SD = 0.836) and had a more positive perception about readers ease for selecting books.
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
CNV type had a significantly overdispersed phylogenetic signal for a sequence similarity tree of the LRR codons of RPP8 (Bloomberg’s K = 0.504, p = 0.038, Figure S4 ), and a marginally significant phylogenetic signal for overdispersion on a tree of the non-LRR codons of RPP8 (Bloomberg’s K = 0.389, p = 0.059).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
marginal significancep = 0.0861.7× alphagold
In the predining state ( Figures 10A – C ), for the item “I am extremely hungry right now” ( Figure 10A ), an ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of music type ( F (2, 845) = 2.85, p = 0.059), and a marginal significance of the Time × Music interaction ( F (4, 1,690) = 2.04, p = 0.086).