“marginally significant”

Results demonstrate that tangible resources show a marginally significant mean value of the slope factor (slope mean = -0.04, p = 0.059; T1–3 means = 3.47, 3.42, and 3.41, respectively), which suggests that the mean level of tangible resources show a decreasing trend over time.

The neurometric (i.e., mental workload index) showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.059) increase in the Hard condition, coherently with the cognitive psychology literature that demonstrated an inverted relationship between mental workload and performance after exceeding an optimal threshold [ 11 ].

Performance for high-confidence non-noticers was marginally significant by the preferred measure of sensitivity (d′ 2afc = 0.12, p = .059) , but was not significantly above-chance by percent correct measures (51.18%, 95% CI = [47.67%, 54.69%]) — perhaps further validating the choice of unbiased sensitivity estimates in tasks such as these.

However, this correlation was not found for monolinguals ( r = -0.318, p = 0.1) and was marginally significant for bilinguals when tested in their L1 ( r = 0.349, p = 0.059).

The inverted image yielded marginally significant differences in change ratios ( F (2,26) = 3.165, p = .059, η 2 = 0.196)(see Fig. 2 , bottom row).

At the occipital sites, the learning effect was significant on the left hemisphere for the OL group (P = 0.028), and marginally significant on the right hemisphere for both groups (ML: P = 0.059; OL: P = 0.053) (see Figure 9 ).

The difference in life satisfaction in the past between the two groups was marginally significant ( t = 1.90; p = 0.059).

A similar (but marginally significant, p = 0.059) activity relationship occurred for summer but not spring ( Figure 3 c,d).

There was a marginally significant ( P = 0.059) main effect of treatment for HT.

We found a marginally significant interaction between sex and population ( L ratio = 5.65; P = 0.059).

A potential mechanism for these associations is suggested by the marginally significant ( p = 0.059) finding of increased levels of CRP, a marker of systemic chronic inflammation, associated with RT.

A repeated measures ANOVA confirmed these impressions as a significant effect of blood glucose evaluation day was found [ F (2,12) = 73.46, p < 0.000] and a marginally significant group effect [ F (1,6) = 5.40, p < 0.059], but no interaction [ F (2,12) = 2.21, p = 0.15].

On the other hand, participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the instrumental meditation music reported a marginally significant decrease in alertness ( p = .059, Bonferroni-corrected), whereas the opposite was observed for participants who followed the relaxation instructions with the drumming sequence ( p = .054, Bonferroni-corrected).

Additionally, peak amplitude also decreased with age, although this effect was marginally significant ( F (1, 24) = 3.93, p = .059, η p 2 = .14).

Footnotes 1 When included in the same ANOVA, where hand (hand/right) and estimate type (perceived/actual) were within-participants factors and prime group (LHFeelsSmallerObjects/RHFeelsSmallerObjects) was a between-participants factor, there was a marginally significant Grasping Hand × Estimate Type interaction, F (1, 28) = 3.88, p = .059, η p 2 = .12. 2 When included in the same ANOVA, where Grasping Hand (left/right) and estimate type (perceived/actual) were within-participants factors and Tape Group (LHTaped/RHTaped) was a between-participants factor, there was a significant Grasping Hand × Estimate Type × Tape Group interaction, F (1, 28) = 45.80, p < .001, η p 2 = .62.

According to the age group, patients aged above 70 years underwent SLNB during BCS more frequently than those aged below 70 years, with a marginally significant difference (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.993–1.475; p = 0.059).

A marginally significant trend was also observed for TNK (RR 1.10 95% CI 1.0–1.21, p = 0.059) (Fig.

Sex of the host influenced transmission in both cases, but conversely: females were associated with a higher probability of infection in birds (OR: 3.98 [95% CI: 1.48–10.72]), whereas in mice, males were more likely to transmit infection (marginally significant association, p = 0.059, OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.09–1.93]) than females.

In addition, a marginally significant difference was found between the two groups for color mood scores under high brightness ( t (35) = 1.948, p = 0.059, d = 0.435, 95% CI [− 0.016, 0.760]).

The continuous variable NFA showed a marginally significant interaction with warmth, F (1, 179) = 3.62, p = .059, η 2 p = .02: Participants higher in NFA (+1 SD ) tended to have a stronger preference for stereotypically warm groups over stereotypically cold groups, M diff = 15.81, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [12.64, 18.98], F (1, 179) = 96.95, p < .001, η 2 p = .35, than participants lower in NFA (−1 SD ), M diff = 11.45, SE = 1.61, 95% CI [8.28, 14.61], F (1, 179) = 50.80, p < .001, η 2 p = .22.

When age and pre-pregnancy BMI were not controlled for, the association of PSQI grade and GDM became marginally significant (OR = 1.146, 95% CI: 0.995~1.321, P = 0.059).

Further adjustment for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and c-reactive protein (CRP) (Model-1B) attenuated all associations, leaving only KIM-1 marginally significant (p = 0.059).

However, the sense of presence was marginally significant in Model 2, β = 0.27, t = 1.95, p = 0.059.

After adjusting for confounding factors, time × group interaction became significant for total n -6 PUFA (p = 0.026) and marginally significant for C15:0 (p = 0.059) and C16:0 (p = 0.056), and became non-significant for C17:1 (p = 0.162) and C18:3n-3 (p = 0.105).

Feeling incomplete evacuation and time in lavatory per attempt (Completeness and Time variables) may be considered as marginally significant (p= 0.059).