“marginally significant”

6.2 ± 2.7%, p = 0.025) and marginally significant larger decrease in body fat mass (4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 3.9 ± 2.4 kg, p = 0.059).

The results indicated that, compared with the inactive group, individuals engaging in moderate-intensity physical activity weekly had a 0 to 21% lower odds of OSA symptoms, with the difference being marginally significant ( P = .059); while those engaging in high-intensity physical exercise per week had a 10 to 31% reduced probability of developing OSA symptoms ( P < .05).

Statistically marginally significant decrease was also observed for IL-10 concentrations (P < 0.059), for the two blood samples (acute phase and 2 weeks later).

We found a marginally significant interaction between sex and population ( L ratio = 5.65; P = 0.059).

41 The association between fatigue and depression in the present SCD sample was marginally significant ( r = 0.43; p = 0.059).

Our two-way ANOVA analysis detected marginally significant interactions in the core temperature between condition and exposure time ( F (4,83) = 2.367, p = 0.059).

While SC had a marginally significant effect on SCULT (H4: β = 0.111, t = 1.891, p = 0.059), its direct relationships with SK (H5: β = 0.053, t = 0.810, p = 0.418) and SP (H6: β = 0.096, t = 1.468, p = 0.142) were statistically nonsignificant.

However, the sense of presence was marginally significant in Model 2, β = 0.27, t = 1.95, p = 0.059.

Footnotes 1 When included in the same ANOVA, where hand (hand/right) and estimate type (perceived/actual) were within-participants factors and prime group (LHFeelsSmallerObjects/RHFeelsSmallerObjects) was a between-participants factor, there was a marginally significant Grasping Hand × Estimate Type interaction, F (1, 28) = 3.88, p = .059, η p 2 = .12. 2 When included in the same ANOVA, where Grasping Hand (left/right) and estimate type (perceived/actual) were within-participants factors and Tape Group (LHTaped/RHTaped) was a between-participants factor, there was a significant Grasping Hand × Estimate Type × Tape Group interaction, F (1, 28) = 45.80, p < .001, η p 2 = .62.

The majority of participants (8/10) in the SC group showed a decline in total ACE-III score, eliciting a marginally significant median decrease, z = −1.89, p = 0.059.

Brain maintenance The regression model predicting WML volume ( F (3, 35) = 6.70, p = 0.001) revealed a significant effect of age (β = 0.51, p = 0.001; sr 2 = 0.24) and a marginally significant effect of the composite score (β = -0.26, p = 0.059).

A marginally significant reduction was observed in the mRNA expression of CB1 ( p = 0.059).

S1b), and there was a marginally significant negative relationship between soil organic carbon and herbivore nematodes ( R = − 0.67, p = 0.059, Fig.

We found a significant difference between the conditions at 83%, t (22) = 2.319, p < 0.05, and a marginally significant difference at 17%, t (22) = −2.01, p = 0.059 (Figure 2 ), although none of the tests survived Bonferroni correction.

Interactions The interaction analysis identified a marginally significant differential effect for personnel by presence of CBT ( β = −0.75, p = 0.059).

The results showed a significant hemisphere × age interaction effect on global efficiency [ t = 2.99, P = 0.009; false discovery rate (FDR)–corrected] and a marginally significant interaction effect on local efficiency ( t = 2.24, P = 0.059; FDR-corrected) in TD infants, whereas no significant results were observed in infants with congenital SNHL ( E glob : t = −1.13, P = 0.26; E loc : t = −1.44, P = 0.16; FDR-corrected).

The differences in the proportion of the distribution of these behavioral modification stages between the control and intervention groups were significant at 3 months ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant at 6 months ( p = 0.059).

In particular, there were marginally significant reductions from level -3 to level -2, F (1, 44) = 3.75, p = .059, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08, and from level -2 to level -1, F (1, 44) = 3.17, p = .082, η p a r t i a l 2 = .07, and a marginally significant increase from level -1 to level 0, F (1, 44) = 3.90, p = .055, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08.

Only two carnivore species exhibited movements that positioned them in the proximity of GPS‐collared elk post‐parturition more often than did hypothetical movements, cougars (β elk presence = 0.94, p = 0.001; Figure 3b ; Table S3 ) and bears, although for bears the result was marginally significant (β elk presence = 0.30, p = 0.059; Figure 3b ; Table S3 ).

Marginally significant associations were found between Aix and LDL1 (r = 0.29, p = 0.059) ( Figure 1 d), TG (r = 0.27, p = 0.078), total cholesterol (r = 0.30, p = 0.058), and ApoB100 (r = 0.29, p = 0.057) in the patient group.

However, the differences in sex, CGI-s scores and PANSS-General psychopathology scale scores between the two groups were marginally significant ( p = 0.059, p = 0.123 and p = 0.090, respectively) at baseline (Table 1 ).

The difference in neighborhood density is marginally significant [ t (16) = 2.029, p = 0.059].

A marginally significant interaction of measurement time × complexity [ F (1,19) = 4.02, p = 0.059, η 2 = 0.18], a significant interaction of training × complexity [ F (1,19) = 6.64, p = 0.018, η 2 = 0.26], and a marginally significant interaction of measurement time × training × complexity [ F (1,19) = 3.14, p = 0.093, η 2 = 0.14] were also observed.

Mean change of AST over study period was significant in group G3 ( P = 0.01), and marginally significant in group G2 ( P = 0.059).

After adjusting for confounding factors, time × group interaction became significant for total n -6 PUFA (p = 0.026) and marginally significant for C15:0 (p = 0.059) and C16:0 (p = 0.056), and became non-significant for C17:1 (p = 0.162) and C18:3n-3 (p = 0.105).