“marginally significant”

For valence ratings, we found a significant main effect of stimulus, F (1, 24) = 13.49, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.360, as well as a marginally significant interaction of Phase × Stimulus, F (1, 24) = 3.92, p = 0.059, η 2 p = 0.140.

Also only among men, reflection directly and positively predicted integrative self-knowledge (β = .17, p < .001); the difference between regression coefficients in men and women was marginally significant ( t = 1.89, p = .059).

The correlation coefficient between ξ1 and ξ2 was weak but significant ( r = 0.47, P = 0.05) for the normalized measures and marginally significant ( r = 0.45, P = 0.059) for the original ones.

The Time × Grammar interaction was marginally significant [ F (1, 23) = 3.63, p = .059], as initial blocks showed stronger activation for ABB than for ABC [ p = .002], whereas activations to both grammars were equivalent in the final blocks [ p = .2].

We also found a marginally significant interaction effect between solution type and region, F (2, 48) = 3.410, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.124, and a significant interaction effect between region and laterality, F (2, 48) = 7.785, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.245.

The main effect of Dose was marginally significant [ F (2, 14) = 3.54, p = 0.059].

The time to moulting in LWS females was more than twice that of control and LW females, marginally significant ( H = 5.65, P = 0.059) ( Figure 2 ) even at the low number of observations.

Air quality has a significant negative relationship with QBR ( p = 0.035) and a marginally significant positive relationship with interception percentage ( p = 0.059).

For School 1 which sees a marginally significant inequality effect in the mock exams (−6.889 points, P = 0.059), the inequality effect for Gaokao is also significant and of similar magnitude (−8.440 points, P = 0.015).

The main effect of Group was marginally significant ( F (1, 83) = 3.657, p = 0.059, η 2 = .016).

Interactions The interaction analysis identified a marginally significant differential effect for personnel by presence of CBT ( β = −0.75, p = 0.059).

There is a marginally significant negative correlation between age and BMD z-score ( p = 0.059, r = − 0.30).

It was marginally significant (p = 0.059) that patients in the CNV group were older when OCTA was performed.

A marginally significant reduction was observed in the mRNA expression of CB1 ( p = 0.059).

Statistical evidence supported a marginally significant interaction between site and time on otolith Pb:Ca in our BACI design ( p = 0.059; Table 2 ).

In particular, there were marginally significant reductions from level -3 to level -2, F (1, 44) = 3.75, p = .059, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08, and from level -2 to level -1, F (1, 44) = 3.17, p = .082, η p a r t i a l 2 = .07, and a marginally significant increase from level -1 to level 0, F (1, 44) = 3.90, p = .055, η p a r t i a l 2 = .08.

The interaction was not observed with the SL measure of SVO ( F (1,404) = 0.83, p = .364), but was marginally significant when the participants were categorized to proselfs and prosocials [ 22 ] ( F (1,404) = 3.60, p = .059).

Results confirmed those emerged from the parametric analysis on log‐transformed data, showing a main effect of habituation trial, F (1,42) = 294.93, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant Habituation trial × Habituation order interaction, F (1,42) = 3.77, p = 0.059.

Compared with OVH, EVH was associated with lower secondary SSI rate, which was marginally significant (1.1% vs. 4.0%, p=0.059).

Age exhibited a marginally significant positive association (β = 0.544, P = 0.059), whereas BMI and PMNE showed no significant effects.

The main effect of hemisphere was marginally significant, F (1, 116) = 3.65, p = .059, η p 2 = .031, 95% CI [-.032,.093], with a trend towards faster response times in the right hemisphere ( M = 737, SD = 112) than the left ( M = 748, SD = 117).

Number of offspring was significantly positively related to FGA, but not to all other variables (including social success; here, the relationship turned out to be marginally significant: p = .059).

Our analysis revealed a marginally significant lower number of duplication events in AD+P cases compared with AD−P controls ( P =0.059) using multivariable regression model.

There was a marginally significant correlation between the blood Hg level and the WAZ-BWZ among 109 infants (r = −0.182, p = 0.059; Supplementary Figure S1 ).

Repeated measures ANOVA for Global Cognition revealed a marginally significant main effect of Time (F = 3.719, df = 1,54, p = .059) and a trend-level Treatment Group x Time interaction (F = 2.960, df = 1,54, p = .091) with small effect size ( d = 0.25).