“marginally significant”

The interaction between quantity and group was marginally significant, F (7, 224) = 2, p = .06, η p 2 = .05.

There was a marginally significant difference between positive and negative language contexts ( p = 0.060).

The Shannon Diversity Index of landcover types within a 500-m buffer had a marginally significant positive effect on the number S. lineatus captured in pitfall traps at field pea sites (χ2 = 3.56, df = 1, P = 0.06, estimate = 1.47 ± 0.78) ( Supplementary Fig.

In this part of the task, 45 , 46 , the Cyfip1 +/− rats continued to respond to the original S + over successive sessions, while the WT began to switch their choices to the new S + (a 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed a main effect of SESSION ( F (3,39) = 3.67, p < 0.05) and a GENOTYPE × SESSION interaction ( F (3,39) = 3.76, p < 0.05), where a main effect of GENOTYPE was marginally significant ( F (1,13) = 4.32, p = 0.06)).

Additionally, Cat activity showed marginally significant 1.3-fold enhancement ( P = 0.06, Fig. 6D ).

Interestingly, the association between the MYLIP genotype and the presence or absence of an LDLR mutation was marginally significant ( P =0.06).

This effect was marginally significant in risk-preferring rats (F(13,66) = 1.79, p=0.06).

4b–e ), while abundance expressed a marginally significant relationship with latitude ( P = 0.060) (Fig. 4a ).

Working Memory There was a statistically significant main effect for time, F (3, 69) = 24.16, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.51, main effect for condition, F (1, 23) = 7.59, p = 0.01, η 2 p = 0.25, and a marginally significant time by condition interaction, F (3, 69) = 2.51, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.10.

Likewise, after controlling for object-level performance (proportion correct), the AQ score × gamma correlation in Experiment 2 was non-significant when using a two-tailed test, rs (17) = − .37, p = .12, but marginally significant when using a one-tailed test, p = .06.

For patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the combination therapy achieved a significant better PFS than the monotherapy (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.90; p = 0.01), and a better OS with the difference marginally significant (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.02; p = 0.06).

In contrast, cumulative protein intake showed no significant association at 12 mo, and only a marginally significant association with infant fat mass at 18 mo (Pearson R = 0.19, P = 0.06, Supplementary Figure 7A, B ).

The association between willingness for future training and membership in the advanced group decreased from significant ( p = 0.048) to marginally significant ( p < 0.06), while its association with the transitional group remained significant ( p < 0.05).

In one phase of their task, the FRN measure showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.06) positive association with extraversion (specifically a measure of agentic extraversion) amongst participants given a placebo.

The study of the relationship between cognitive abilities in different modalities showed that visual selective attention and auditory working memory had a marginally significant correlation ( P =0.06, r=0.43).

The effect of time-varying pubertal status was marginally significant: a one-unit (between person) increase on the pubertal status scale corresponded to an average contemporaneous reduction in %MVPA of about 0.83% (p = 0.06).

A marginally significant Group×Block interaction during acquisition, F (2, 108) = 2.8, p = .06, η 2 = .05, ε = .79, supported a learning effect.

The posterior midline ROI shows a marginally significant interaction Polarity * Truth [F(1, 30) = 3.811, p = 0.06, partial η 2 = 0.113].

Moreover, although marginally significant, the latter were younger (t(166)=-1.90, p=.06) and immigrated at an older age (t(159)=1.87, p=.06) than the diagnosed group.

Moreover, there was a marginally significant interaction effect of personal relevance (p = .06).

At the end of 24 weeks, 29 (67%; 95% CI 53% to 80%) in the Ca+D group and 11 (44%; 95% CI 27% to 63%) in the Ca group achieved the primary combined outcome of radiographic and alkaline phosphatase endpoints, and this difference was marginally significant (p=0.06).

For Theravada meditation, we observed a marginally significant main effect of Condition (Rest, Kasina, Vipassana): F(2,18) = 3.2, p = 0.06.

We tested whether the significant predictors could provide any complimentary information to clinical stage of T4/N3 and the sum of all nodal GTVs at 2 weeks for prediction of DF, and found that neither total TV BV , nor mean and max SUV, nor total TLG of all nodal tumors had a p < 0.3, and only TV BV of primary tumors at 2 weeks showed marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

For the long-term memory outcome ( Figure 2 ), there was a marginally significant main effect for condition, F (2, 38) = 2.89, P = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.13.

Median levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.23), LDL (p = 0.71), and triglyceride (p = 0.41) were not significantly different between baseline and 24 weeks, and HDL showed a marginally significant change (p = 0.06).