“marginally significant”

GERD was the only predictor of IPF, while ulcers and biomass exposure were the marginally significant factors (p=0.06) shown in Table-III .

However, among the 20 subjects who did use condoms there was also a marginally significant trend towards more vaginal E. coli (p = 0.06) and a highly significant increase in other enteric gram-negative rods (p = 0.001) after protected intercourse [ 106 ].

For the participants in the fluent group, the mean rating ( M = 2.52, SD = 1.60) was significantly lower than the neutral 4, t (26) = 4.81, p < .001, d = 1.89; however, the difference between the mean rating ( M = 3.22, SD = 2.08) and the rating of 4 in the nonfluent group was marginally significant, t (26) = 1.94, p = .06, d = 0.38, indicating that in the fluent group, participants tended to believe blocking was more effective.

We showed a significant difference in the probability distribution between iTBS-L DLPFC and cTBS-L DLPFC (Wald–Wolfowitz test, P = 0.03) with a marginally significant difference between cTBS-L DLPFC and cTBS-R DLPFC ( P = 0.06).

Notably, the improvement in the NDI was marginally significant ( P =.06), whereas the improvements in the ISI and PCL-5 were not statistically significant ( P =.26 and P =.37, respectively; Table 3 ).

We found a marginally significant prediction power of improvement in attention ASCS ( t (17) = − 1.99, p = .06) and a significant effect of improvement in memory ASCS ( t (17) = − 2.35, p < .05) to predict the patient’s change in HAM-D from baseline to follow-up.

ANOVA revealed a significant effect of pharmacological treatment (F (1,23) = 4.18, p < 0.05) and a marginally significant effect of stress (F (1,23) = 3.77, p = 0.06) at the 24 h time point.

Control populations did not show a significant change over time, although there was a marginally significant decrease in survival over time (F = 3.84; df = 1,45; P = 0.06) ( Fig. 4 A ).

In particular, the SNP pair of rs11892646 and rs56219526 was marginally significant after multiple testing adjustments ( p ‐value = .06).

Furthermore, after controlling for total number of depressive episodes and comorbid diagnoses, bipolar patients trended towards greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with unipolar patients while the interaction effect is marginally significant (F=2.86, p=0.06, partial eta square=0.04, Figure 2 ).

Salamander Group had a marginally significant effect on salamander T b ( P = 0.06), possibly because the minimum gradient temperature tended to be slightly colder through the season ( Fig.

The result was also marginally significant (p=0.06).

At the uncorrected level, the detectability difference was also significant in the time window between saccade cue and saccade onset ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant during saccade ( p = 0.060).

This three‐way interaction was marginally significant for externalizing symptoms (β = .62 (−0.02 to 1.25); p = .06) (Table 2 ).

There was a marginally significant, positive correlation between MHI and dock abundance in 2000 (Table 5 , χ2(1) = 3.54, p = 0.06).

There are marginally significant differences in the number of female flowers between the distal half (1.2 ± 1.1; mean ± SD) and the proximal half (3.3 ± 3.4; P = 0.06) of the inflorescence.

The marginally significant reduction in %EBWL was seen in the patients with BMI ranging from 30 to 35 and 36 to 40 with a p-value = 0.06.

Overall scores showed no significant differences between the VOR and VBR groups ( P =.20), but both exceeded the mean score of 71.4, indicating that the participants in both groups considered the app as being “good” to “excellent.” In terms of learnability scores, the two groups showed a marginally significant difference ( P =.06), suggesting that users found the VBR app slightly more difficult to learn to use.

Psychological distress on the BSI global severity index was marginally significant (B = -10.7, p < 0.06).

From the stratified analysis, females had a marginally significant negative parameter estimate for the value (B = -0.11, p = 0.06) in contrast to other genders possessing no statistically significant coefficient.

Significant association was found in CMT, EZ disruption, DRIL, and ELM disruption ( Table 2 ). Marginally significant association was found in deep parafoveal VD ( p = 0.06).

Here, NGSD are the only significant contribution to the dingo group in the two-lineage models, but this signal is mostly lost when three lineages are used, although there was a marginally significant contribution from NGSD ( p = 0.06).

The HE-RFI group showed marginally significant higher values for NDF and NFC digestibility (g/kg), ( P = 0.06 and 0.08, respectively).

The interactive effect of valence and electrode zone was significant, [ F (4, 140) = 4.43, p = 0.03, η 2 p = 0.11], indicating that the difference between TiN and TiP is significant in the central-parietal and parietal areas ( p = 0.003, p = 0.002), marginally significant in the central area ( p = 0.06), but not in the frontal and frontal-central areas.

Age and positive affect scores were not significantly associated at baseline ( r = −.098, p = .557), or change from baseline ( r = .285, p = .083), though were marginally significant post-intervention ( r = −.308, p = .060), suggesting older ages were associated with lower positive affect at the end of the study, regardless of intervention type.