“marginally significant”

The AC total score also showed a moderate and marginally significant correlation with the overall external peer feedback score provided in Year 4 [ r =0.38, p =0.06 (one-tailed)].

r = .125 was, however, marginally significant ( p = .06) and in the predicted direction.

Notably, the improvement in the NDI was marginally significant ( P =.06), whereas the improvements in the ISI and PCL-5 were not statistically significant ( P =.26 and P =.37, respectively; Table 3 ).

Results of the analyses on latency showed a significant difference between long-time priming ( M = 744 ms) and short-time priming ( M = 673 ms), F 1 (1,35) = 46.10, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.56, F 2 (1,22) = 30.91, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.58, and a marginally significant, but unreliable 17-ms, difference between long-time concepts ( M = 717 ms) and short-time concepts ( M = 700 ms), F 1 (1,35) = 3.81, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.10, F 2 (1,22) < 1, ns.

4b–e ), while abundance expressed a marginally significant relationship with latitude ( P = 0.060) (Fig. 4a ).

There was a marginally significant contrast for the interaction of task and periods i and ii, F (1,25) = 4.0, P = .06, η 2 p = .14, indicating a steeper decline in mu power from period i to ii during the report-grasp task (from 4.75 μV 2 to 3.01 μV 2 ) than during the report-colour task (from 4.41 μV 2 to 3.12 μV 2 ).

The correlation coefficient for the Dutch elderly population was marginally significant (ρ = -0.40, p-value = 0.06).

23 The provision of CRT alone was associated with a marginally significant (24%) reduction in all-cause mortality (p = 0.06).

Interestingly, the association between the MYLIP genotype and the presence or absence of an LDLR mutation was marginally significant ( P =0.06).

ANOVA also revealed marginally significant interaction between self-referential type and caudality [ F (8,136) = 2.78, p = 0.06].

The effect of the diagnosis group on DO 2 was marginally significant ( p = 0.06; η = 0.37; OP = 0.55) in the AS group (Table 3 ), such that DO 2 was lower in the NDR than in mild NPDR ( p = 0.05).

Of interest was a marginally significant decrease in liver metastases for patients receiving preoperative combined treatment (p = 0.06).

No significant effects were evident for any of the self-report measures of impulsivity, although a marginally significant interaction effect of DRD2TaqI A and DRD4 VNTR was evident on the SSS Total scale ( F (1,177) = 3.52, p = .06, η p 2 = .02).

The parents exhibited more-vigilant behaviour in the nest-box with an enlarged entrance (2.07 ± 0.41%) than in that with a control entrance (0.90 ± 0.41%), but this was marginally significant (mixed model, nest F 1,20.1 = 4.12, P = 0.06; playback F 1,21.3 = 0.28, P = 0.60; nest × playback F 1,20.9 = 2.93, P = 0.10; temperature F 1,36.0 = 2.05, P = 0.16; brood F 1,20.5 = 0.88, P = 0.36; Fig. 2b ).

IL-6 (but not CRP) was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.06) of GFDCAV at 5 years ( Table 3 ).

SES differences were less pronounced upon stratification, with trend tests significant only among females ( p = 0.004), and marginally significant among Hispanic males ( p = 0.06).

During the intervention period, within the control cohort there was a marginally significant increase in the proportion of individuals with increased frailty (compared with the intervention group) (Fisher's test p<0.06; online supplementary figure 10C ).

The kaempferol concentration was almost doubled in EF leaves compared to F leaves; this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant effect of Direction, F (1,11) = 4.2, MSE = 127.3, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, reflecting the slightly larger corrective positioning during rightward drift noted above.

Additionally, there was a marginally significant effect of small bee visitation on pollinator-perceived color (p=0.06; Table 2 ).

Post hoc pairwise comparison performed with Holm’s sequential Bonferroni correction revealed that the ITD threshold increased when the modulation depth in one ear was reduced to 71%, and this reduction was marginally significant (t= -2.37, p= 0.06).

Duration of breastfeeding was no longer significant in country-constrained PERMANOVA after FDR correction; however, it was a marginally significant factor in CAR alone (FDR-adjusted p = 0.06).

Finally, the interaction between Task and Block was also statistically significant in SDNN F (2.88, 69.05) = 3.26, p = .028, η 2 p = .12 and marginally significant in rMSSD F (2.59, 62.28) = 2.67, p = .06, η 2 p = .10.

Addressing folic acid was marginally significant, F (1,229) = 3.56, β = -.012, p = .06.

There was a marginally significant main effect of compatibility [ F (1,132) = 3.51, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.02], indicating more correctly solved items per second for compatible ( M = 1.06, SD = 0.28) as compared to incompatible number pairs ( M = 0.93, SD = 0.27).