“marginally significant”

34 had a marginally significant difference between the US and LM group ( p = 0.06).

However, the interaction was now marginally significant, F (2, 73) = 3.78, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05.

The pooled results in testosterone levels [ 20 , 32 , 35 ] showed a marginally significant difference between true acupuncture with medicine and sham acupuncture with medicine (MD −0.10, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.00, P = .06, I 2 = 94%, Table 2 ).

For the participants in the fluent group, the mean rating ( M = 2.52, SD = 1.60) was significantly lower than the neutral 4, t (26) = 4.81, p < .001, d = 1.89; however, the difference between the mean rating ( M = 3.22, SD = 2.08) and the rating of 4 in the nonfluent group was marginally significant, t (26) = 1.94, p = .06, d = 0.38, indicating that in the fluent group, participants tended to believe blocking was more effective.

N400 time window The analysis of mean amplitude in the 411–561 ms (N400) time window revealed a marginally significant effect of event boundary ( F (1, 39) = 3.62, p =.06, η p 2 = 0.10), and a significant interaction between event boundary, AP and memory ( F (1, 34) = 11.26, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.25).

sH1N1 FluoroSpot revealed no significant changes in IFNγ SFCs after either dose of vaccine ( Fig 3C ), but exhibited a marginally significant increase in GrB SFCs post-dose 1 (p = 0.06; Fig 3D ).

There was a marginally significant effect of irradiation × treatment interaction on immobility (F (1,22) = 3.81, P = 0.06).

At the uncorrected level, the detectability difference was also significant in the time window between saccade cue and saccade onset ( p = 0.027), and marginally significant during saccade ( p = 0.060).

Conversely, urinary creatinine (CREA-U) levels increased significantly in the intervention group ( p = 0.018) but not in the control group, with a marginally significant intergroup difference ( p = 0.060).

The effect of prime type was marginally significant for words, F (1.89,39.78) = 3.08, p = 0.060, but significant for pseudowords, F (1.80,37.85) = 7.14, p = 0.003.

There was a marginally significant treatment response observed for the K-10 ( F 1, 26 = 3.86, p = 0.060).

The interaction between ER time windows and groups was marginally significant (F(3,75) = 2.52, p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ).

While initial findings suggested that pet owners were more likely to be durably virally suppressed (OR = 1.82, p < 0.01), this association weakened, though remained marginally significant, after adjusting for covariates (OR = 1.55, p = 0.06).

When each replicate was taken separately, dogs were significantly preferred over chickens in 16 of 18 replicates (binomial test, P ≤0.001 in 13 replicates and P <0.05 in 3 replicates; one trial was marginally significant, P = 0.06, and one not significant).

The overall effect of fuel-treatment was marginally significant ( F 2,30.77 = 3.09, P = 0.060; see Table S5 ).

Planned comparisons revealed significant differences between standards and deviants in the frontal ( p < 0.001) and central parietal montages ( p < 0.001), but only a marginally significant difference in the left temporal montage ( p = 0.06).

Paired comparisons with Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test revealed that there was a significant increase from baseline to day 16 ( P < .01), a marginally significant decrease between day 16 and 69 ( P < .06), and no difference between baseline and 69 days after the second LP ( P = .97).

For athletic performance, we observed an improvement of 0.28 s which was marginally significant (p = 0.06), in the 40 m sprint with HR use ([HR vs.

Further demonstrating the utility of the initial dip as a biomarker for metabolic overdrive, neither group alone (nor as a single aggregated group) had significant correlations between the subsequent PVC positive response (~6 s post stimulus onset) and drift rate improvement ( Figure 5B ; though the correlation of the minority group was marginally significant cc = −0.62, P = 0.06).

A multivariate regression analysis was performed that demonstrated that minor victimization did not have a positive association with depression in women ( β = −0.05, SE = 0.40, p = 0.91), while major victimization on the other hand, had a marginally significant association ( β = 1.00, SE = 0.54, p = 0.06).

When comparing the six constructs across gain and loss frames, regardless of small chance or most common frame, perceived susceptibility is marginally significant ( p = 0.06 ) with those in the loss frame ( M = 4.16, SD = 1.33) reporting higher mean levels of susceptibility than those in the gain frame ( M = 3.98, SD = 1.38).

Additionally in Step 3, academic motivation had a marginally significant effect on PTG (B = 0.16, p = 0.060).

We also found a marginally significant effect of country ( B ± S.E. = 15.424 ± 8.166, 95% CI = [-0.439, 31.535], b = 0.235, t = 1.889, p = .06) and a marginally significant interaction between country and fulfillment on guilt ( B ± S.E. = -3.490 ± 1.958, 95% CI = [-7.357, 0.309], b = -0.201, t = -1.783; p = .075), such that American participants tended to report more guilt and their self-reported guilt was more sensitive to degree of fulfillment.

This finding was marginally significant (p = 0.060, two-tailed, n = 34).

Results: Twenty-three patients (76.5%) and 15 controls (50 %) showed hypoechogenicity of RN, which was marginally significant (P=0.06).