“marginally significant”

Psychological distress on the BSI global severity index was marginally significant (B = -10.7, p < 0.06).

Specifically, 32% of people reporting a positive test were hypertensive compared with only 11% of those with negative tests (p=0.03) and, marginally significant, 32% of those with a positive test result also reported either type 1 or type 2 diabetes compared with only 12% of those with a negative test (p=0.06).

The interaction of pressure to have a son and number of living children was marginally significant (OR = 4.75, p < 0.06; 95% CI = 0.98, 25.99).

Finally, planned comparisons between grasping and pointing conditions for size and luminance tasks separately (target present trials) revealed that the difference between those two conditions was significant in the luminance task, t (13) = 2.1, p < 0.05 (one-tailed) and marginally significant in the size task, t (13) = 2.1, p = 0.06 (one-tailed).

Height had a marginally significant negative effect on the frequency of fights ( χ 2 1 = 3.50; p = 0.06), whereas weight had a significant positive effect ( χ 2 1 = 3.93; p = 0.048).

A two-way ANOVA for RTs showed that the main effect of neighborhood size was not significant in participant analysis [F 1 (1,105) = 0.65, p = .42], and marginally significant in item analysis [F 2 (1,96) = 3.54, p = .06]; the main effect of grade was significant in both participant and item analysis [F 1 (2,105) = 3.56, p <.05; F 2 (2,96) = 4.92, p <.01], post hoc analysis showed that the 3 rd graders responded significantly slower than the other two groups ( ps <.05), and there was no remarkable difference between the 5 th and 7 th graders ( p >.1); the two-way interaction was significant in participant analysis [F 1 (2,105) = 8.08, p <.01], but non-significant in item analysis [F 2 (2,96) = 0.45, p = .64].

Pairwise post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons [ 36 ] revealed significantly reduced trabecular bone mineral density in ovariectomized (0.11±0.0088 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 9.0, p<0.001) and AP-treated groups (0.15±1.85 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 7.0, p<0.001) relative to sham (0.26±0.028 g/cm 3 ) but only a marginally significant difference between sham and the ALEN -treated ovariectomized rat values (0.19±0.0058 g/cm 3 ; mean rank difference 3.5, p=0.06).

The marginally significant reduction in %EBWL was seen in the patients with BMI ranging from 30 to 35 and 36 to 40 with a p-value = 0.06.

( 2006 ) showed that, in the privileged block, the difference between salient (5.4%) and non-salient (0.5%) trials was marginally significant by speakers ( F 1 , p < .06) and significant by items ( F 2 , p < .05).

Furthermore, the ANCOVA showed that there is a marginally significant relation between trust in news via Facebook and critical evaluation (F 1,299 =3.62, P =.06) and a significant relation between following the news daily and critical evaluation (F 1,299 =15.14, P <.001).

In this model, citizenship of the parents was marginally significant (β = −0.108, p = 0.06, 95% CI: −0.226–0.009).

However, a significant effect on mortality resulted from combining thiacloprid at one tenth MRD with tebuconazole at one tenth MRD (p = 0.03), one half MRD (p = 0.02) and MRD (p<0.01), as well as a marginally significant effect when combined with tebuconazole at one twentieth MRD (p = 0.06).

A χ 2 -homogeneity test revealed just a marginally significant difference between the interleaved and the blocked group at T1 with a small effect size, χ 2 (5, N = 2288) = 10.55, p = 0.06, C corr = 0.10.

A repeated measure analysis (ANOVA) with amount of coins (two levels: 10/0 versus 8/0) as a within-subjects factor and age group (five levels) as a between-subjects factor yielded the expected main effect of amount of coins [ F (1, 88) = 80.09, p < 0.001] and a marginally significant main effect of age [ F (4, 88) = 2.35, p = 0.06].

In the upper alpha band, there were no significant effects of Training or Task, apart from a marginally significant interaction between Task and Hemisphere [ F (1,19) = 4.07, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.18], which revealed a larger hemispheric ERD difference (in favor of the right hemisphere) in the figural-spatial compared to the multiplication problems.

Emergency room visits were marginally significant (emergency room visits 0.18 versus 0.07, P = 0.06).

Results: There was a marginally significant correlation between the redness and the fleshiness of pterygium ( P = 0.06).

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant ( P =.06) difference in Mediterranean diet adherence between baseline (mean 5.9, SD 2.3) and at 12 weeks (mean 6.2, SD 2.7).

The main effect of outcome frequency (50% and 80% error rate conditions) was marginally significant ( F 1, 23 = 3.91, p = 0.06), showing that slower RT in the 50% (840 ± 20 ms) than in the 80% (833 ± 20 ms) error rate condition.

The W -score by sex interaction was marginally significant for visuospatial memory in the right hOc1 ( β = 4.57, p = 0.06).

The latency time until manifestation for pediatric was shorter and marginally significant ( P = 0.06). 3.4.

Concern about infections and awareness of bacterial accumulation did not differ significantly among education groups, despite a marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.060) between cleaning frequency and education levels.

Closer inspection by the Mann–Whitney-U test for the comparison of only two independent groups indicated that the difference in the compatibility effect was significant between neglect patients and healthy controls ( p < .05, Z = 2.33) and marginally significant between neglect patients and patient controls ( p = .06, Z = 1.9), whereas, it did not differ between the two control groups ( p = .87, Z = 0.4).

Tumor diameter (cutoff value, 2.8 cm) showed as marginally significant (p = 0.06).

However, after modifying the experimental procedure so that more dissonance was thought to be induced (i.e., making choice more important and meaningful), they found a marginally significant difference between preference change in the Rate-Choose-Rate condition and that in the Rate-Rate-Choose condition ( p = 0.06; Chen and Risen, 2010 ), suggesting that the mere act of making a choice seems to have an effect on preference over and above the artifact.