Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Follow-up simple main effect for group analysis revealed that there were no differences between the intervention group and waitlist control group at T1 (baseline), but a marginally significant difference at T2 (immediate intervention/s baseline assessment), F (1,194) = 3.66, p = 0.06, ⴄ p 2 = 0.019.
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
The results from ANOVA comparing the three types of phylogenetic endemism centers for individual climate variables showed that of the six current climatic variables, mean annual temperature and precipitation during the driest month showed a significant difference among the types of endemism centers ( P < 0.05) and annual precipitation showed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.06; Table S1 ).
marginally significantp < 0.061.2× alphagold
Results of correlation analysis were then subject to unsupervised clustering (using the Ward’s method) in order to identify clusters of parameters with similar correlational behavior, which were presented in the form of a correlation matrix (i.e., heatmap). For the sake of increased readability, the heatmap shows only statistically and marginally significant ( p < 0.06) correlations.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Using Pillai’s trace, the multivariate statistics revealed a main effect of WTC on cognitive functioning, F (3,31) = 3.32, p = 0.03, η 2 = 0.24, as well as a marginally significant interaction between WTC and leisure time activity, F (3,31) = 2.79, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.21, but no main effect of leisure-time activity, F (3,31) = 1.48, p = 0.24, η 2 = 0.13, and voluntariness in WTC, F (3,31) = 2.03, p = 0.13, η 2 = 0.16.
marginally significantp ≤ 0.061.2× alphagold
With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.